Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100027933
Original file (20100027933.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  26 May 2011

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20100027933 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests award of the Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM).

2.  The applicant states he never received the award of the AGCM after having served 4 years of active duty service with no time lost or disciplinary actions.  He further states he was never advised of any disqualification of the award by his unit commander.

3.  The applicant provides:

* His DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty)
* His award of the Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM) 
* His award of the Army Achievement Medal (AAM)
* Three Certificates of Achievement
* A Letter of Commendation
* Orders awarding him the Driver Badge (Track Badges) and Driver Badge (Wheel Badges) [properly known as the Driver and Mechanic Badge with Driver-T (for tracked vehicles) and Driver-W (for wheeled vehicles) Bar]

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of 


Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army in Lansing, MI on 30 October 1991 for a period of 4 years, training as a multiple launch rocket system (MLRS) crewman, and a cash enlistment bonus.

3.  He served honorably until he was released from active duty (REFRAD) on
29 October 1995 due to completion of required service.  He had served 4 years of active service.  Item 13 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of his DD Form 214 issued at the time of his REFRAD shows the:

* AAM
* National Defense Service Medal
* Army Service Ribbon
* Overseas Service Ribbon

4.  A review of his official records failed to show any derogatory information or a commander's disqualification that would serve to disqualify him for award of the AGCM.

5.  The documents provided by the applicant show he was awarded the ARCOM and the Driver and Mechanics Badge with Driver-T and Driver-W Bars that were not included on his DD Form 214.

6.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the Army Good Conduct Medal is awarded to individuals who distinguish themselves by their conduct, efficiency, and fidelity during a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service.  This period is 3 years except in those cases when the period for the first award ends with the termination of a period of Federal military service.  Although there is no automatic entitlement to the Army Good Conduct Medal, disqualification must be justified.  


DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service, it appears that the applicant should have received the first award of the AGCM for his service from 30 October 1991 through 29 October 1994.  This conclusion is based on the fact that the record is void of any derogatory information which would preclude the applicant from being awarded the AGCM, and the lack of any specific action by the applicant’s unit commander to disqualify him from receiving this award.

2.  The evidence suggests that the applicant not receiving the AGCM was likely the result of an administrative error as opposed to it being the result of a conscious disqualification by any of his unit commanders.  Therefore, in the interest of justice, this error should be corrected and the applicant should be awarded the AGCM at this time.

3.  Additionally, the applicant was awarded the ARCOM and the Driver and Mechanic Badge with Driver-T and Driver-W Bars.  Therefore, these awards should be added to his DD Form 214 at this time. 

BOARD VOTE:

____X___  ___X____  ____X___  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1. The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by:

	a.  awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for the period
30 October 1991 through 29 October 1994; and

	b.  adding to item 13 of his DD Form 214 the:

* Army Commendation Medal
* Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award)
* Driver and Mechanic Badge with Driver-T and Driver-W Bars
2.  The Board wants the applicant and all others to know that the sacrifices he made in service to the United States are deeply appreciated.  The applicant and all Americans should be justifiably proud of his service in arms.



      ____________X____________
                 CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100027933



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100027933



4


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090015866

    Original file (20090015866.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his records be corrected to reflect awards of the Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM), the Army Achievement Medal (AAM), the Combat Action Badge (CAB), the Driver's Badge with wheel and track bars, and the Mechanic's Badge. After carefully examining the applicant's record of service, it appears that the applicant should have received the AGCM for his service from 31 October 2001 through 30 October 2004. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003086875C070212

    Original file (2003086875C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence of record and independent evidence provided by the applicant do not provide any information that confirms that the applicant was ever recommended for or awarded the Tab W with his Driver and Mechanic Badge or the Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge during his active duty tenure. As a result, the Board finds there is insufficient evidence to support adding these awards to the record. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case for the individual...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100011452

    Original file (20100011452.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Army Regulation 600-8-22 states the Army Good Conduct Medal is awarded to individuals who distinguish themselves by their conduct, efficiency, and fidelity during a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal (first award) for the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140010483

    Original file (20140010483.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show his complete record of service, including the period of his honorable service and all of his authorized awards. The applicant provides copies of his – * DD Form 4 (Enlistment/Reenlistment Document – Armed Forces of the United States), dated 29 March 2005 (page 1) * two DA Forms 638 (Recommendations for Award), dated 28 August 2004 and 31 May 2005 * three permanent...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110011706

    Original file (20110011706.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 30 July 1993 to show: * he participated in the Liberation and Defense of Kuwait campaigns * in item 11 (Primary Specialty) 11B2OC2 Infantry Anti-armor Specialist * in item 12f (Foreign Service) 4 years, 8 months, 12 days * in item 13 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized (All periods of service)) the: * Army...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090017332

    Original file (20090017332.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's military personnel records show he enlisted in the Regular Army on 22 August 1989. Item 9 (Awards, Decoration & Campaigns) of the applicant's DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record) does not show he was awarded the Army Commendation Medal or the Driver and Mechanic Badge. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by amending item 13 of his DD Forms 214 with separation dates of 18 September 1999...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040004574C070208

    Original file (20040004574C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 31 March 2005 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20040004574 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant requests, in effect, that the Driver’s Badge (Operator/Special) and Mechanics Badge be added to the list of authorized awards on his separation document (DD Form 214). The applicant provides orders...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080009774

    Original file (20080009774.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Section 4 (Chronological Record of Military Service) of the applicant’s DA Form 24 (Service Record) shows the applicant received “Excellent” efficiency and conduct ratings throughout his military assignments. Lacking any derogatory information on file that would have disqualified him, it would be appropriate to award the applicant the first award of the Good Conduct Medal based on completion of qualifying service ending with the termination of a period of Federal military service and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120008409

    Original file (20120008409.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His record contains four DD Forms 214. a. In light of his overall record of service, it would be appropriate to award him the AGCM (3rd Award) for this period and to correct his final DD Form 214 to show this award. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. amending Headquarters, 83d Ordnance Battalion (Ammunition), General Orders Number 3, dated 7 March 1963, to show the period for the AGCM (2nd Award) as "28...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130002510

    Original file (20130002510.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states: a. he received numerous letters of appreciation and achievement, and a V Corps medallion; b. his awards include the National Defense Service Medal (NDSM), Sharpshooter Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar, and the Driver and Mechanic Badge with Wheeled Vehicle Bar; c. other veterans have questioned why he has not received the AGCM for his service to the country; and d. his record should be reviewed for consideration of all awards for which he qualified. ...