Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100027753
Original file (20100027753.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  24 May 2011

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20100027753 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that he be awarded the Purple Heart.

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that he was wounded in Vietnam on 16 July 1969 and was not awarded the Purple Heart.  He goes on to state that he never got treatment and took care of the wound himself.

3.  The applicant provides:

* A one-page letter explaining the circumstances of his wound
* An unsigned statement from his squad leader
* A copy of orders awarding him the Army Commendation Medal with “V” Device for heroism on 16 July 1969
* A copy of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge)

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant was inducted into the Army of the United States in Spokane, Washington on 17 July 1968.  He completed his basic training and advanced individual training as an infantry indirect fire crewman at Fort Lewis, Washington and was transferred to Vietnam on 26 January 1969.  He was assigned to Company E, 2d Battalion, 501st Infantry Regiment, 101st Airborne Division (Airmobile) for duty as an ammunition bearer.

3.  On 27 October 1969, he was awarded the Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM) with “V” Device (First Oak Leaf Cluster) for heroism on 16 July 1969.  The citation for this award makes no mention of the applicant being wounded.

4.  The applicant departed Vietnam on 24 January 1970 for assignment to Fort Lewis, Washington where he remained until he was honorably released from active duty (REFRAD) on 10 September 1970.  He had served 2 years and 
3 days of total active service and he was awarded the National Defense Service Medal, Vietnam Service Medal, Combat Infantryman Badge, Air Medal, the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal and ARCOM with “V” Device and 1 Oak Leaf Cluster.

5.  A review of his records failed to show any evidence he was wounded in Vietnam as a result of enemy action or that he was treated for such wounds.  Additionally, his name is not contained in the Vietnam casualty listing.

6.  A review of the Awards and Decorations Computer-Assisted Retrieval System, an index of general orders issued during the Vietnam era between 1965 and 1973 maintained by the Military Awards Branch of the U.S. Army Human Resources Command, failed to reveal any orders awarding him the Purple Heart.

7.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides that the PH is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of hostile action.  Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have required treatment by a medical officer, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record.






DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  While the sincerity of the applicant's claim that he was wounded in Vietnam is not in doubt, he has failed to show through the evidence of record and the evidence submitted with his application that he was wounded as a result of enemy action and that the treatment for his wounds was made a matter of official record.

2.  In the absence of such evidence, there appears to be no basis to award him the Purple Heart at this time.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X___  ___X____  ___X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1. The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.

2.  The Board wants the applicant and all others concerned to know this action in no way diminishes the sacrifices made by him in service to the United States during the Vietnam War.  The applicant and all Americans should be justifiably proud of his service in arms.



      _______ _   __X_____   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100027753



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100027753



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090013987

    Original file (20090013987.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    There are no orders or other evidence authorizing award of these decorations to the applicant. Item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations, and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) shows that the applicant was awarded the National Defense Service Medal, ARCOM with first oak leaf cluster, Combat Infantryman Badge, Purple Heart, Air Medal, Vietnam Service Medal (VSM) with one bronze service star, and the RVN Campaign Medal with Device (1960). As a result, the Board...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070009577

    Original file (20070009577.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) be corrected to show a second award of the Purple Heart (in effect, a Purple Heart with Oak Leaf Cluster), Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM), and the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB). The applicant's records show that he was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130020292

    Original file (20130020292.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    There is no evidence the applicant was awarded the first award of the Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM). The entry in item 40 of the applicant's DA Form 20 that shows he was wounded in action on 15 May 1969 and the DA Form 8-275-3 that shows he was awarded the Purple Heart on 17 May 1969 are accepted as sufficient evidence on which to base adding award of the Purple Heart to his DD Form 214. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080014675

    Original file (20080014675.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant's records show that he was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal. His commander states that the only explanation for the applicant not receiving the Purple Heart was because within 10 days of the action the applicant rotated back to the United States.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100019648

    Original file (20100019648.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). There is no evidence in the applicant's military personnel records that shows he was wounded or treated for wounds as a result of hostile action. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding the applicant the Purple Heart for wounds received in action in the Republic of Vietnam on 10 July 1968; b. deleting from...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080016567.

    Original file (20080016567..txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states, in effect, that he received the Purple Heart for wounds received in action on 12 June 1969; however, he was wounded a second time on 2 August 1969 but was never issued the Purple Heart. The entry on the applicant’s citation for the Bronze Star Medal with “V” Device with First Oak Leaf Cluster for heroism on 2 August 1969 in Vietnam which states that he was wounded by an impacting grenade is accepted as sufficient evidence on which to base a second award of the Purple...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090004174

    Original file (20090004174.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Paragraph 2-13 of the awards regulation contains guidance on award of the VSM and states, in pertinent part, that a bronze service star is authorized with this award for each campaign a member is credited with participating in while serving in the RVN. As a result, it would be appropriate to award the applicant the PH 1st Oak Leaf Cluster (2nd Award) for being wounded in action in the RVN on 28 March 1968 and to add the entry PH 1st Oak Leaf Cluster (2nd Award) to item 24 of his DD Form...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060011421

    Original file (20060011421.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show three awards of the Bronze Star Medal (one award for service and two awards for valor) (correctly known as the Bronze Star Medal with “V” Device with Second Oak Leaf Cluster), the Air Medal, the Purple Heart, four awards of the Army Commendation Medal with “V” Device (correctly known as the Army Commendation Medal with “V” Device with Third Oak Leaf Cluster), the Silver Star, the Combat...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090017135

    Original file (20090017135.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that the Purple Heart (PH), Bronze Star Medal (BSM) 2nd Oak Leaf Cluster (3rd Award), and Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM) 1st Oak Leaf Cluster (2nd Award) be added to his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge). Item 38 of the applicant’s DA Form 20 also shows he received "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings at all of his active duty assignments, and his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF) is void of any...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120007211

    Original file (20120007211.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    There are no orders in the applicant’s service personnel records nor did he provide a copy of orders awarding him the Bronze Star Medal. The applicant was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by adding the following awards to his DD Form 214: * Purple Heart (2nd Award) * Four bronze service stars to be affixed to his already-awarded Vietnam Service Medal * Republic of Vietnam...