Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100027392
Original file (20100027392.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  14 June 2011

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20100027392 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests reconsideration of his previous request to correct his narrative reason for separation.

2.  The applicant states, in effect, the Board's denial of his previous application has pained him.  He has a side in this matter and feels he did not get an opportunity to defend himself.  He further contends, in effect, that:

	a.  the Board's assessment that his service was "undistinguished service" was rude and inaccurate.

	b.  becoming a distinguished Soldier is a journey, as is building any career, undertaken one step at a time with setbacks;

	c.  he was selected supernumerary when he was chosen for guard duty and received a letter from the colonel; he worked hard and achieved all first-time goes on his Soldier's skills assessment;

	d.  he won Soldier of the Month at the Field Artillery Board, but missed out on competing for Soldier of the Quarter or Year because he was transferred to another unit that did not offer these opportunities;

	e.  being written up for being "too cool" was unfounded, degrading, and excessive, and bleeds with petty jealousy;

	f.  he, like anyone, made his own mistakes and maybe a lack of discretion was one of them;

	g.  his roommates blew pot smoke in his face while he slept.  He failed a fake "UA" [interpreted to mean a unit urinalysis];

	h.  he had no opportunity for rehabilitation;

	i.  he was continuously denied advanced training and when he went to his battery commander the nightmare really began; he wanted to Soldier and take advantage of what the Army had to offer;

	j.  he requested to appear before the Board to defend himself, but he was denied the opportunity; he is not asking for a handout, he just wanted to be heard;

	k.  he does not understand why he cannot file some form to have the statute of limitations waived; and

	l.  he believes he has given 100 percent and then some.

3.  The applicant provides no additional documentation.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Incorporated herein by reference are military records which were summarized in the previous consideration of the applicant's case by the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) in Docket Number AR20100000704, on 15 July 2010.

2.  The applicant has presented new argument concerning the positive aspects of his military service which is new evidence that must now be considered by the Board.

3.  The previous Record of Proceedings (ROP) noted:

	a.  the 3-year statute of limitations was waived allowing the Board to fully consider the applicant's request.




	b.  the applicant successfully completed training as a fire support specialist and advancement to private first class, pay grade E-3.

	c.  the applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 25 June 1986.  He underwent his one-station unit training (OSUT) at Fort Sill, OK and remained assigned there for his first and only permanent duty assignment.

	d.  that on 13 November 1987, the applicant’s commander notified him he was initiating action to separate him from the service under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations - Enlisted Personnel), paragraph14-12c, for commission of a serious offense - abuse of illegal drugs.  He cited the basis for his recommendation was the applicant tested positive marijuana, he had an AWOL offense, poor performance, lack of discipline, and he failed to respond to numerous counseling sessions.  The applicant had also
13 negative counseling sessions by his chain of command.  His commander advised him that he was recommending that his service be characterized as general under honorable conditions.

	e.  that after consulting with defense counsel, the applicant elected not to submit a statement in his own behalf and he declined a separation medical examination.

	f.  that the appropriate authority approved the recommendation for discharge on 1 December 1987 and directed that he be furnished a General Discharge Certificate.

	g.  accordingly, he was discharged under honorable conditions on 
7 December 1987, under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 14-12c by reason of misconduct - abuse of illegal drugs.

4.  The previous ROP failed to discuss the applicant's request to appear before the Board.

5.  A review of the applicant's military records failed to produce evidence indicating that he received any decorations, certificates or letters of commendation, or appreciation, or service medals.  He did receive the Army Service Ribbon, Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Grenade Bar, and the Marksman Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar.



6.  Army Regulation 15-185 (Army Board for Correction of Military Records) provides that applicants do not have a right to a hearing before the ABCMR.  The Director of the ABCMR may grant a formal hearing whenever justice requires.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends his previous request to correct his narrative reason for separation should be reconsidered because he was not afforded the opportunity to defend himself before the Board.  He also believes the Board only looked at the negative side of his service and ignored his positive accomplishments.

2.  The applicant requested a personal appearance before the Board; however, there is sufficient evidence in the available record to fully consider this case, a formal hearing is not warranted.  Unfortunately, the initial ROP failed to mention this issue or to explain to the applicant that his appearance before the Board was not necessary for the Board to make a fair and balanced determination.

3.  The ROP cited the statute regarding the 3-year limitation placed on the Board for the review of applications.  It also stated that in the interest of justice, it had elected to conduct a substantive review of the applicant's case.  This, in effect, waived the 3-year statute of limitations.

4.  The applicant's contention that he was  selected supernumerary of the guard; received a letter from the colonel; achieved all first time goes on his Soldier's skills assessment, won Soldier of the Month at the Field Artillery Board, and received a letter of merit, have been noted.  These accomplishments are not normally filed in a Soldier's Official Military Personnel File.  Accordingly, they were not available for review by the previous Board, and were not provided for review at this time.  However, it is unlikely that these accomplishments would have been sufficient to change the outcome of the previous Board.

5.  The applicant has not provided any new documentation or convincing argument concerning his desire to have his narrative reason for separation changed.  Accordingly, the previous Board's findings and determination should stand.

6.  In view of the above, the applicant's request for reconsideration to change the narrative reason for his discharge should be denied.





BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X____  ____X___  ____X___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis to amend the decision of the ABCMR set forth in Docket Number AR20100000704, dated 15 July 2010.




      _______ _   __X_____   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100027392



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100027392



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120017559

    Original file (20120017559.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states: * his AER was marked "marginally achieved course standards" because he was charged with a driving under the influence (DUI) for which a General Officer Memorandum of Reprimand (GOMOR) was issued * the Department of Army Suitability Evaluation Board (DASEB) transferred the GOMOR to the restricted portion of his AMHRR after his second appeal * he was never convicted of DUI and he met all of his academic requirements as the comments clearly state * when the AER was...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140012154

    Original file (20140012154.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    f. The ROP stated that his medical records were not available for the time he was in Vietnam and that his personnel records were void of nearly all documentation related to Vietnam. He has the Army Commendation Medal, shrapnel still in his arm, and the Board states he needs more proof. There is no available evidence of record and the applicant did not provide sufficient evidence provided showing he show he sustained a wound/injury as a result of enemy action, received treatment, and that...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140018381

    Original file (20140018381.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. d. Part Va (Performance and Potential Evaluation (Rater) - Evaluate the Rated Officer's Performance During the Rating Period and His/Her Potential for Promotion), the rater placed an "X" in the "Other," block and entered the following comments: While [Applicant's] duty performance was satisfactory during the rated period, his off-duty conduct was unbecoming of an officer and of a nature to bring discredit upon the Armed Forces. His...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150003497

    Original file (20150003497.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states: * the documents are false and they disgrace the United States because some of the actions of which he was accused never happened * he was never drunk and disorderly * he was only given a urinalysis on two occasions and they were three weeks apart * his unit never offered him entry into the Army Drug and Alcohol Prevention and Control Program (ADAPCP) * he tried on his own to enter ADAPCP and this was during and within the three-week timeframe between the urinalysis...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001051961C070420

    Original file (2001051961C070420.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Accordingly, that report should also be removed from his records. The applicant did so and the report was removed from his records. After reviewing the evidence submitted by the applicant and the evidence of record, the Board is convinced that the applicant was counseled and was aware of the expectations of his rating chain, but failed to meet them.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110010668

    Original file (20110010668.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 1 December 2011 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20110010668 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant contends that his UOTHC discharge should be upgraded to general, under honorable conditions, because there were a lot of errors in the court-martial and that the charges were going to be dropped and everything reinstated. The evidence clearly shows that after the applicant's court-martial was remanded, he admitted his guilt and requested to be discharged in...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001065032C070421

    Original file (2001065032C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    He requested that the OSRB change the senior rater profile block from the third to the second block on both reports and submit his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF) for reconsideration for promotion to major. • He stated that the 1994 Board decision which resulted in the senior rater potential evaluation being removed from the OERs did not result in his promotion to lieutenant colonel, that he was passed over for promotion by the March 1998 board, that 73 percent of his peers were...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130001639

    Original file (20130001639.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests an upgrade of his discharge under other than honorable conditions to general under honorable conditions. On 5 October 1987, the applicant's immediate commander initiated a recommendation to eliminate him from the Army by reason of misconduct. _______ _ X _______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130013405

    Original file (20130013405.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    In a memorandum/self-authored statement, dated 11 April 2012, to the ABCMR, she requested the following relief that was not previously addressed in ABCMR ROP 2, dated 11 July 2013: * the transcript [she purchased from an unaccredited school] and all associated documents relating to this [her appeal for the NCOER for the period 1 July 2008 through 30 June 2009 in ROP 2] and any previous appeals be removed from her AMHRR * the transcript [she purchased from an unaccredited school] be reviewed...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140011246

    Original file (20140011246.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    * the GOMOR and AER record the misconduct which occurred as well as the command actions taken to address that misconduct * the GOMOR is an administrative measure with its own due process; comparisons to civilian legal practices might instruct but would lack relevance * by placing it in the applicant's permanent OMPF the imposing officer clearly felt the applicant's misconduct warranted the ability of future reviewers, evaluating him for possible favorable personnel actions, to know what...