Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100026893
Original file (20100026893.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	    5 May 2011

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20100026893 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be corrected to reflect his total years of service and the date he entered active duty.

2.  The applicant states his DD Form 214 does not reflect his correct years of service or the date he entered active duty.  He goes on to state he entered active duty on 13 July 1965 and served until 27 July 1969.  He further states he reentered active duty on 13 July 1970 and served until he retired on 1 September 1989.

3.  The applicant provides his DD Form 214, dated 31 August 1989.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army in Atlanta, Georgia, on 13 July 1965 for a period of 3 years.  He was honorably discharged on 12 July 1966 for the purpose of immediate reenlistment.  He was issued a DD Form 214 covering the period 13 July 1965 to 12 July 1966. 

3.  He reenlisted on 13 July 1966 for a period of 3 years and assignment to Vietnam.  He was honorably discharged on 23 July 1969 due to the expiration of his term of service.  He was issued a DD Form 214 covering his service from 13 July 1966 to 23 July 1969.

4.  On 13 July 1970, he again enlisted in the Regular Army for a period of 3 years.  He was honorably discharged on 12 April 1973 for the purpose of immediate reenlistment.  He was issued a DD Form 214 covering the period 13 July 1970 to 12 April 1973.

5.  On 13 April 1973, he reenlisted for a period of 5 years and he was honorably discharged on 15 March 1978 for the purpose of immediate reenlistment.  He was issued a DD Form 214 covering the period 13 April 1973 to 15 March 1978.

6.  On 16 March 1978, he reenlisted for a period of 3 years.  He again reenlisted on 18 December 1980 for a period of 6 years and on 19 September 1986 for a period of 3 years.

7.  On 31 August 1989, he was honorably retired in pay grade E-7 due to length of service.  He completed 23 years, 1 month, and 18 days of active service and had 24 years, 1 month, and 7 days of total service for pay purposes.

8.  His DD Form 214 issued at the time of his retirement reflects that he entered this period of active duty on 16 March 1978, which is the date following his last DD Form 214 issued on 15 March 1978.  It shows he completed 11 years, 5 months, and 15 days of active service during this period and 11 years, 8 months, and 3 days of prior active service.

9.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) serves as the authority for the preparation of the DD Form 214.  It provides that the DD Form 214 will reflect active service that is performed during the period covered by the DD Form 214 and will reflect prior active service as well.  However, effective 1 October 1979 the regulation was changed to eliminate the issuance of a DD Form 214 for immediate reenlistments.  A break in service in excess of 24 hours required that a DD Form 214 be issued from that point and continues to present day.  A DD Form 214 may not be issued to cover a period of service already documented by a previously-issued DD Form 214.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's contentions have been noted and were found to lack merit.  The applicant was issued DD Forms 214 up to 15 March 1978 in accordance with the regulation in effect at the time.  Copies of these DD Forms 214 will be provided to him.

2.  Following the period his last DD Form 214 was issued the regulation changed and provided that the DD Form 214 would no longer be issued for immediate reenlistments.  Accordingly, his service began (for the purpose of issuing DD Forms 214) the day following the issuance of his last DD Form 214.

3.  His DD Form 214 was properly prepared in accordance with the applicable regulation and properly reflects that he entered this period of active duty on 16 March 1978.

4.  Additionally, it appears that all of the applicant's service is accounted for on his last DD Form 214.

5.  In order to justify correction of a military record, the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear that the record is in error or unjust.  The applicant failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__X_____  ___X___  ___X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.

2.  The Board wants the applicant and all others to know the sacrifices he made in service to the United States during the Vietnam War are deeply appreciated.  The applicant and all Americans should be justifiably proud of his service in arms.



      __________X_________
       	   CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100026893



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100026893



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003086179C070212

    Original file (2003086179C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) with an ending date of 31 March 1989 to show: Therefore, there is insufficient evidence upon which to correct his records to show he held MOS 11C for 23 years and 7 months. That so much of the application as it relates to correction of his DD Form 214, with an ending date of 31 March 1989, to show he held PMOS 67V for 16 years; MOS 67Y for 6 years and 3 months; MOS 67N for 17 years...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100014467

    Original file (20100014467.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests, in effect, correction to item 12a (Date Entered AD [Active Duty] This Period) and item 12c (Net Active Service This Period) on his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 31 July 1994. Prior to September 1979, a separate DD Form 214 was issued for each period of reenlistment.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090003839

    Original file (20090003839.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides the following documents in support of his application: * Two letters of response, dated 20 February 2009 and 19 December 2008, from the Chief, Transition and Separations Branch, U.S. Army Human Resources Command, St. Louis, MO (HRC-STL); * Letter, dated 11 February 2009, addressed to the Transition and Separations Branch, HRC-STL; * NGB Form 22 (National Guard Bureau Report of Separation and Record of Service); * DD Form 214 for the period ending 8 January 1978; * NGB...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120007345

    Original file (20120007345.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record) shows he was honorably discharged on 9 October 1972 and he reenlisted in the Army on 10 October 1972. The applicant was issued a DD Form 214, dated 25 October 1962, which shows he was initially inducted into the Army on 21 August 1962. Item 12f on his DD Form 214, dated 31 August 1989, shows he had 1 year, 11 months, and 20 days of foreign service during the period covered by the DD Form 214.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001054349C070420

    Original file (2001054349C070420.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Records available to the Board indicate the applicant served on active duty between 17 August 1966 and 14 February 1972. There is no evidence the applicant was ever awarded a Meritorious Service Medal or the Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal as an individual decoration and as such there is no basis to correct his record to show those two awards. There is no evidence that he was ever awarded the Good Conduct Medal for his initial period of qualifying service (17 August 1966-16...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110021743

    Original file (20110021743.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Chapter 2 contains guidance on the preparation of the DD Form 214 and states that: a. a DD Form 214 will be issued when an enlisted Soldier is discharged to continue on active duty as a commissioned or warrant officer; b. for the entries at item 11 (Primary Specialty), the titles of all MOS's or areas of concentration (AOC), served in for at least 1 year during the period covered by the DD Form 214, are to be entered with the number of years and months shown. For time determination, 16 days...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050002076C070206

    Original file (20050002076C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show his correct date of discharge. He states there are no discharge documents which show his periods of service from 14 August 1966 through 11 July 1967 and 2 January 1975 through 29 June 1979 and his service in Germany, Vietnam and Korea. The evidence of record shows the applicant reenlisted on 30 September 1976 and was discharged on 29 June 1979.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100018097

    Original file (20100018097.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states that he entered the Army June 1971 and served for 12 years and 5 months; however, his DD Form 214 incorrectly reflects that he entered active duty on 27 July 1978 and while it reflects his two tours in Germany it does not reflect is tour in Korea. His DD Form 214 issued at the time of his discharge shows that he entered active duty this period (block 12a) on 27 July 1978 and that he had served 5 years, 9 months, and 13 days of service that period. Therefore, it appears...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090011754

    Original file (20090011754 .txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant reenlisted in the Regular Army for a period of 3 years on 24 July 1970. The DD Form 214 he was issued shows the following entries in year(s), month(s), and day(s) format: a. item 12a (Date Entered [Active Duty] This Period), "1976 12 08"; b. item 12b (Separation Date This Period), "1989 06 30"; c. item 12c (Net Active Service This Period), "12 06 23"; and d. item 12d (Total Prior Active Service), "07 05 27." It provides a brief, clear-cut record of active duty service at the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090020826

    Original file (20090020826.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant also requests his total active Army service on his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) with a separation date of 18 May 1992 be corrected to show he completed 17 years of active service instead of 13 years. The applicant provides copies of: * his DD Form 214 with a separation date of 18 May 1992 * his DD Form 214 with an effective date of 29 October 1978 * eight pages from his military personnel record CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. He was issued...