IN THE CASE OF:
BOARD DATE: 10 May 2011
DOCKET NUMBER: AR20100026835
THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:
1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).
2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests the Purple Heart be added to his DD Form 214 (Report of Transfer or Discharge).
2. The applicant states:
* The Purple Heart that was earned was not recorded on his DD Form 214
* He was wounded in the chest in April 1967 while patrolling in Vietnam
* Hostiles were in full force and several people were wounded
3. The applicant provides:
* Two radiology reports
* DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record)
* Two service medical records
* Two photographs
* DD Forms 214 for the periods ending 17 October 1968 and 17 October 1972
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicants failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicants failure to timely file. In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.
2. He enlisted in the Regular Army on 21 March 1966 for a period of 3 years. He served as a parachute rigger in Vietnam from 19 September 1966 to
18 September 1967. On 17 October 1968, he was honorably discharged for immediate reenlistment.
3. Item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of his DD Form 214 for the period ending 17 October 1968 does not show the Purple Heart as an authorized award.
4. He reenlisted on 18 October 1968 for a period of 4 years. He served as a parachute rigger in Vietnam from 2 January 1969 to 1 January 1970. On
17 October 1972, he was honorably discharged.
5. Item 24 of his DD Form 214 for the period ending 17 October 1972 does not show the Purple Heart as an authorized award.
6. There are no orders for the Purple Heart in his service personnel records.
7. Item 41 (Awards and Decorations) of the applicant's DA Form 20 does not show the Purple Heart and item 40 (Wounds) of his DA Form 20 is blank. His name does not appear on the Vietnam casualty roster.
8. A review of the Awards and Decorations Computer-Assisted Retrieval System (ADCARS), an index of general orders issued during the Vietnam era between 1965 and 1973 maintained by the Military Awards Branch of the United States Army Human Resources Command, failed to reveal any orders for the Purple Heart pertaining to the applicant.
9. In support of his claim for the Purple Heart, he provided service medical records which show he was wounded on 2 April 1967 and he was treated for a superficial fragment wound to the left side of his chest. However, no evidence shows this wound was the result of hostile action in Vietnam.
10. He also provided a radiology report, dated 12 March 1987, which states "a metallic density is seen projecting over the left costophrenic angle on one view and behind the sternum on another view." The other radiology report provided by the applicant, dated 1 October 2010, states "curvilinear metallic density over left anterior thoracic wall again noted. May relate with a prior gunshot or shrapnel injury or possibly prior surgery." However, there is no evidence this metallic density is the result of hostile action.
11. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides, in pertinent part, that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of hostile action. Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify that the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have required treatment by medical personnel, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. Although the service medical records provided by the applicant show he was treated for a fragment wound to the left side of his chest, there is insufficient evidence to show he was injured as a result of enemy action.
2. There is no evidence of record which shows that the applicant was wounded as a result of hostile action in Vietnam. In the absence of orders or other evidence of record showing that the applicant was injured and treated for wounds as a result of hostile action in Vietnam, the radiology reports provided by the applicant are not sufficient as a basis for award of the Purple Heart. Regrettably, there is insufficient evidence on which to amend his DD Form 214 to show award of the Purple Heart in this case.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT FULL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
____X____ ___X_____ ____X____ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case
are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.
_______ _ X_______ ___
CHAIRPERSON
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20100026835
3
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20100026835
2
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140017178
Specifically, he requests: * award of the Purple Heart for wounds received during his service in the Republic of Vietnam * correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show he was awarded the Purple Heart * correction of his DD Form 214 to show he was separated in the rank/grade of sergeant (SGT)/E-5, vice specialist four (SP4)/E-4 2. The applicant states: * in March 1970, he was setting up Landing Zone (LZ) Caroline when the unit came...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110014006
His truck was hit and glass flew in his face. He served in Vietnam from on or about 3 November 1966 to on or about 6 August 1967. Notwithstanding the applicant's contention and sincerity, in the absence of documentation that shows he was wounded or injured as a result of enemy action and treated for those wounds, there is insufficient evidence upon which to base award of the Purple Heart in this case.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080006932
The applicant provides: a. The applicant's records contain no evidence upon which an award of the Purple Heart may be made. In order to award a Purple Heart, evidence must show that a wound occurred and was the result of hostile action; that the wound required medical treatment; and that the medical treatment was made a matter of official record.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004103761C070208
The applicant’s military records show that he was inducted into the Army of the United States on 7 October 1966. Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-3 (Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register) lists the unit awards received by units serving in Vietnam. Evidence shows that the applicant’s records contain administrative error which does not require action by the Board.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090021210
There are no orders for the Purple Heart in the applicants service personnel records. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: There is no evidence of record which shows that the applicant was wounded as a result of hostile action in Vietnam. In the absence of orders or other evidence of record showing that the applicant was injured or treated for wounds as a result of hostile action in Vietnam, the radiology reports provided by the applicant are not sufficient as a basis for award of the Purple Heart.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003088738C070403
The applicant submitted two DD Forms 149 (Application for Correction of Military Records), one is dated 19 March 2003, and the other is dated 17 April 2003. His DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) does not show any entry in item 40 (Wounds) or list the Purple Heart in item 41 (Awards and Decorations). Evidence shows that the applicant’s records contain administrative error which does not require action by the Board.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120021132
The applicant, the son of a former service member (FSM), requests his father be awarded the Purple Heart for wounds received on or about 8 November 1968 in Vietnam. There is no evidence in the available records which show the FSM was awarded the Purple Heart or that he was wounded as a result of hostile action in Vietnam. There is insufficient evidence in the available record that shows the FSM was wounded as a result of hostile action in Vietnam.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080005385
The applicant requests that his Purple Heart be added to his separation document (DD Form 214). The applicants military records do not contain orders for the Purple Heart. There is no evidence of record to support the applicants contention that he was wounded by shrapnel while in Vietnam.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080019021
The evidence provided by the applicant was carefully considered; however, in order to justify correction of a military record, the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. Regrettably, absent evidence which conclusively shows that the applicant was wounded or injured as a result of hostile action, that he was treated by medical personnel at the time for wounds or injuries sustained as a result of...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120020471
A statement by a SGT (medical advisor) states he received a fragment wound on 26 July 1972, the wound was cleansed and dressed, and he was then evacuated to the 67th Evacuation Hospital where an X-ray of the wound revealed a small fragment. Therefore, there is insufficient evidence to support awarding him the Purple Heart and correcting his DD Form 214 to show this award. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected...