Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100026428
Original file (20100026428.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  7 June 2011

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20100026428 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that his bad conduct discharge (BCD) be upgraded.

2.  The applicant states that he was not given a fair chance.

3.  The applicant provides a DD Form 293 (Application for Review of Discharge) that states, "I would like to change it, because I desire more than a bad conduct discharge." 

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.



2.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 12 May 1983.  He completed training in military occupational specialty (MOS) 63W as a wheeled vehicle repairer and was stationed in Germany where he served for approximately 41 months and then in Alaska where he was promoted to staff sergeant.   He had been awarded the Army Commendation Medal, Army Achievement Medal (3rd Award), Army Good Conduct Medal (3rd Award), National Defense Service Medal, Noncommissioned Officer Professional Development Ribbon (Primary Level), Noncommissioned Officer Professional Development Ribbon (Basic Level), Army Service Ribbon, Overseas Service Ribbon (2nd Award), and the Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle, Pistol and Grenade Bars.  

3.  On 10 March 1995 a special court-martial found the applicant guilty contrary to his pleas of eight specifications of maltreatment of a subordinate and one specification of striking a noncommissioned officer.

4.  The adjudged sentence of reduction to pay grade E-1, forfeiture of $564 per month for 6 months, and a BCD was approved and, except for the BCD, ordered executed. 

5.  On 5 June 1995 the applicant was placed on involuntary excess leave. 

6.  Headquarters, XVIII Airborne Corps and Fort Bragg Special Court-Martial Order Number 19, dated 12 September 1990, confirmed that in the special court-martial case of the applicant, the sentence was affirmed.  The provisions of Article 71(c) having been complied with, the bad conduct discharge was ordered executed.

7.  On 9 May 1997 the applicant was separated with a BCD.  He had completed 13 years, 11 months, and 28 days of creditable active duty.

8.  Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.  Paragraph 3-7a provides that an honorable discharge is a separation with honor and entitles the recipient to benefits provided by law.  The honorable characterization is appropriate when the quality of the member’s service generally has met the standards of acceptable conduct and performance of duty for Army personnel, or is otherwise so meritorious that any other characterization would be clearly inappropriate.

9.  Paragraph 3-7b of the regulation provides that a general discharge is a separation from the Army under honorable conditions.  When authorized, it is issued to a Soldier whose military record is satisfactory but not sufficiently meritorious to warrant an honorable discharge.  

10.  Court-martial convictions stand as adjudged or modified by appeal through the judicial process.  In accordance with Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552, the authority under which this Board acts, the ABCMR is not empowered to set aside a conviction.  Rather it is only empowered to change the severity of the sentence imposed in the court-martial process and then only if clemency is determined to be appropriate.  Clemency is an act of mercy or instance of leniency to moderate the severity of the punishment imposed.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's trial by court-martial was warranted by the gravity of the offenses charged.  His conviction and discharge were effected in accordance with applicable law and regulations and the discharge appropriately characterizes the misconduct for which the applicant was convicted.

2.  In the absence of evidence to the contrary, it is presumed that the court-martial proceedings were conducted in accordance with law and regulations applicable at the time.  The character of the discharge is commensurate with the offenses.

3.  The applicant offered no evidence or argument in support of his request for an upgrade.

4.  In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's requested relief.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__X_____  __X_____  ___X____  DENY APPLICATION



BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _______ _  x _______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100026428





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100026428



4


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090011278

    Original file (20090011278.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's record shows that he initially enlisted in the Regular Army and entered active duty on 14 July 1989, and was trained in and awarded military occupational specialty (MOS) 91G (Food Service Operations). On 27 June 2008, the applicant was discharged accordingly. The applicant's BCD was appropriate given the gravity of the offenses for which he was convicted.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140016136

    Original file (20140016136.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    When authorized, it is issued to a Soldier whose military record is satisfactory but not sufficiently meritorious to warrant an honorable discharge. His conviction and discharge were effected in accordance with applicable laws and regulations and the discharge appropriately characterizes the misconduct for which he was convicted. Therefore, the applicant's service is insufficiently meritorious to warrant an honorable or a general discharge.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120021112

    Original file (20120021112.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests upgrade of his bad conduct discharge (BCD) to a general discharge (GD), under honorable conditions discharge. When authorized, it is issued to a Soldier whose military record is satisfactory but not sufficiently meritorious to warrant an honorable discharge. It also establishes standardized policy for preparing and distributing the DD Form 214. a. Paragraph 2-4(12f) states to enter the total amount of foreign service completed during the period covered by the DD Form...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080014349

    Original file (20080014349.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    In his self-authored letter, dated 1 July 2008, the applicant requests his discharge be upgraded. When authorized, it is issued to a Soldier whose military record is satisfactory but not sufficiently meritorious to warrant an honorable discharge. Conviction and discharge were effected in accordance with applicable laws and regulations, and the discharge appropriately characterizes the misconduct for which the applicant was convicted.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100023915

    Original file (20100023915.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 24 May 2011 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20100023915 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. His contention that his BCD should be upgraded because it does not properly reflect his service or duty to the U.S. Army and had no bearing on his job performance was carefully considered; however, there is no evidence that shows his GCM was in error or unjust. Trial by a GCM was warranted by the serious nature of the offenses for which he was charged and convicted and the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110002178

    Original file (20110002178.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Item 14 (Military Education) of his DD Form 214 shows he completed the 4-week Primary NCO Course in 1981. Therefore, the applicant's record of service is insufficiently meritorious to warrant an honorable or a general discharge. Conviction and discharge were effected in accordance with applicable law and regulations, and the discharge appropriately characterizes the misconduct for which the applicant was convicted.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110014684

    Original file (20110014684.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He provides: * A DD Form 457 (Investigating Officer's Report), dated 21 February 2002 * An Honorable Discharge Certificate, dated 3 June 1999 * The reverse of a DA Form 638 (Recommendation for Award), dated 22 September 1999 and accompanying Army Commendation Medal Certificate, dated 27 September 1999 * An Honorable Discharge Certificate, dated 31 October 2001 * A Certificate of Promotion to Sergeant (SGT), dated 4 October 2001 * His DD Form 214 * His résumé COUNSEL'S REQUEST, STATEMENT AND...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110023635

    Original file (20110023635.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests his bad conduct discharge be upgraded to a general discharge. After a review of the applicant's record of service, it is clear his service did not meet the criteria for an honorable or a general discharge, or any other characterization of service other than the one he received. _______ _ X_______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100030208

    Original file (20100030208.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He also requests correction to his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show award of the Expert Field Medical Badge. The applicant's military records show he enlisted in the Regular Army (RA), in pay grade E-1, on 13 May 1983, for 4 years. He was discharged from active duty in pay grade E-1 on 27 December 1992, under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations - Enlisted Personnel), chapter 3, section IV, as a result of a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120018427

    Original file (20120018427.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests upgrade of his dishonorable discharge to general under honorable conditions. The conviction and discharge were effected in accordance with applicable laws and regulations and the discharge appropriately characterizes the misconduct for which he was convicted.