Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100025871
Original file (20100025871.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  12 May 2011

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20100025871 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests all medals, awards, ribbons, and citations he is entitled to receive for his military service.

2.  The applicant states his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) does not show any medals for his service in Vietnam.

3.  The applicant provides his DD Form 214.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant's military records show that he was inducted into the Army of the United States on 8 December 1970, was awarded the military occupational specialty of pay distribution specialist, served in Vietnam from 17 July 1971 to 24 June 1972, and was promoted to pay grade E-4.

3.  He was honorably released from active duty on 8 September 1972.  The DD Form 214 he was issued shows he was awarded the National Defense Service Medal and Sharpshooter Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar.  The applicant's DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows his conduct and efficiency was always rated as "excellent."  There is no evidence of any disciplinary action being taken against the applicant.

4.  Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-3 (Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register) shows the pertinent identified campaign periods for which a bronze service star is authorized for wear on the Vietnam Service Medal which coincide with the applicant's service in Vietnam.  Those periods are:  Consolidation I (1 July 1971 to 30 November 1971), Consolidation II (1 December 1971 to 29 March 1972), and Vietnam Cease-Fire (30 March 1972 to 28 January 1973).

5.  Department of the Army General Order Number 8, dated 1974, awarded all personnel assigned to the U.S. Army Vietnam from 8 February 1962 through 28 March 1973 the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation.

6.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides for award of the Vietnam Service Medal.  This medal is awarded to all members of the Armed Forces of the United States for qualifying service in Vietnam after 3 July 1965 through 28 March 1973.  Qualifying service included attachment to or assignment for 1 or more days with an organization participating in or directly supporting military operations.

7.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 also provides that the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960) was awarded to individuals who served in Vietnam for at least 6 months during the period 1 March 1961 to 28 March 1973, inclusive.

8.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 provides that the Army Good Conduct Medal is awarded to individuals who distinguish themselves by their conduct, efficiency, and fidelity during a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service.  This period is 3 years except in those cases when the period for the first award ends with the termination of a period of Federal military service.  A record of punishment is not automatically disqualifying.  However, at that time, a single efficiency rating of less than "excellent" was disqualifying.  Although there is no automatic entitlement to the Army Good Conduct Medal, disqualification must be justified.  Current practice requires that the commander provide written notice of nonfavorable consideration and permits the individual to respond.  At that time, nonfavorable consideration was normally noted on the DA Form 20.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  Since the applicant served in Vietnam, he is entitled to the Vietnam Service Medal with three bronze service stars, Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960), and Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation.

2.  Since the applicant's conduct and efficiency were always rated as "excellent" and there is no record of any disciplinary action being taken against him, it would appear that his not being awarded the Army Good Conduct Medal was an administrative oversight.  It would be appropriate to now award him the Army Good Conduct Medal and to add that award to his DD Form 214.

BOARD VOTE:

___X_____  ___X_____  ___X_____  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined the evidence presented is sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by:

	a.  awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for the period 8 December 1970 to 8 September 1972 and

	b.  amending his DD Form 214 to add the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award), Vietnam Service Medal with three bronze service stars, Republic of 

Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960), and Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation.



      ___________X____________
                 CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100025871



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100025871



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090008934

    Original file (20090008934.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). This document shows that while the applicant was assigned to both regiments in Vietnam they were both cited for award of the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation in accordance with Department of the Army, General Order 6, 1974. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding the applicant the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090010278

    Original file (20090010278.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides his DD Form 214; a letter dated 16 April 1972, Subject: Promotion Merit Roster to Grade E-5 and E-6; a Bronze Star Medal (BSM) with "V" Device Citation which states the decoration was awarded "For distinguishing himself by exceptionally meritorious achievement in connection with ground operations against a hostile force in the Republic of Vietnam during the period 6 February 1972; a BSM Certificate which states that the BSM with "V" Device was awarded to the applicant...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150000047

    Original file (20150000047.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Additionally, item 38 (Record of Assignments) of his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows he received all "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings throughout his military service. Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards), in effect at the time, provided that the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded to individuals who completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130001510

    Original file (20130001510.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Records show that the applicant participated in two campaign periods during his service in the RVN. Accordingly, he should be awarded this medal. Therefore, the Board determined that the records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st award) for the period 15 October 1971 to 13 October 1974; b. deleting from his DD Form 214 the Vietnam Service Medal; and c. showing, in addition to the awards already shown on his DD Form 214, that his...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090019627

    Original file (20090019627.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show the medals and ribbons he earned during his service in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN), to include the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM) and the Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM). Evidence of record shows that the applicant was awarded the RVN Campaign Medal with Device "1960," which is not shown on his DD Form 214. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140008436

    Original file (20140008436.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Therefore, it would be appropriate at this time to award him this medal for the period 3 September 1970 through 24 March 1972 and to correct his DD Form 214 to show this medal. Evidence shows the applicant served a period of qualifying service for award of the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960). As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100011416

    Original file (20100011416.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Bronze Star Medal, Good Conduct Medal [now known as the Army Good Conduct Medal], and the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with 1960 Device. The applicant contends that his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show award of the Bronze Star Medal, Army Good Conduct Medal, and Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with 1960 Device and that he held MOS 16P....

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080003616

    Original file (20080003616.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards), in effect at the time, provides that the Good Conduct Medal is awarded to individuals who have completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service. The evidence of record shows the applicant was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding the applicant the Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for exemplary behavior,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120014011

    Original file (20120014011.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Awards) provided that the AGCM was awarded to individuals who completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service. Therefore, his records should be corrected to show this unit award. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for the period 7 May 1970 to 21 December 1971; b. deleting from his DD Form 214 the Vietnam Service...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100020652

    Original file (20100020652.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show the Reconnaissance Sergeant School, Republic of Vietnam Medal [interpreted to mean the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960)], Air Medal, Bronze Star Medal, and the Presidential Unit Citation. There are no orders or other evidence in the applicant's military personnel records that shows he was awarded the Bronze Star Medal. As a result, the Board...