Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100025546
Original file (20100025546.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	    28 April 2011

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20100025546 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show his total time spent in Vietnam.  

2.  He states that his DD Form 214 should reflect his total time spent in Vietnam.  His DD Form 214 incorrectly reflects 1 year and 4 days and it should also reflect his second tour from 17 December 1970 through 23 September 1971.  He states his first tour was from 12 March 1969 through 6 March 1970.

3.  He provides pages 3 and 4 of his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record), his DD Form 214, and his DD Form 215 (Correction to DD Form 214).

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.
2.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 2 October 1968.  

3.  His DA Form 20 shows in:

	a.  Item 31 (Foreign Service) he served in the U.S. Army Pacific (USARPAC), Vietnam from 12 March 1969 through 6 March 1970 (11 months and 25 days) and 17 December 1970 through 23 September 1971 (9 months and 7 days).  This is a total of 1 year, 9 months, and 2 days of foreign service.  

	b.  Item 38 (Record of Assignments) he was assigned to the following units in Vietnam:

   (1)  Company D, 168th Engineer Battalion from 18 March through 5 May 
1969;

   (2)  Company D, 31st Engineer Battalion from 6 May through 
14 December 1969;

   (3)  Headquarters and Headquarters Company, 31st Engineer Battalion 
from 15 December 1969 through 5 March 1970; and

   (4)  Company B, 36th Engineer Battalion from 23 December 1970 through 
10 June 1971 (the departure date is not indicated).

4.  He was honorably released from active duty on 25 September 1971.  Item 22c (Foreign Service) of his DD Form 214 shows he completed 1 year and 4 days of foreign service in the USARPAC.  

5.  Item 30 (Remarks) on his DD Form 214 shows he served in Vietnam from 12 March 1969 through 25 September 1971.  This is a period of 2 years, 6 months, and 14 days of foreign service.  

6.  He was issued a DD Form 215, dated 11 October 1990, which amended item 22c to reflect 1 year, 9 months, and 2 days of foreign service.  

7.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Personnel Separations - Separation Documents), in effect at the time, prescribed the separation documents prepared for Soldiers upon retirement, discharge, or release from active military service or control of the Army.  It established standardized policy for the preparation of the DD Form 214.  It stated that for enlisted personnel, enter the total active duty outside the continental limits of the United States for the period covered by the DD Form 214 and the last overseas theater in which service was performed.  

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's DA Form 20 shows he served in Vietnam from 12 March 1969 through 6 March 1970 and 17 December 1970 through 23 September 1971, which is a total of 1 year, 9 months, and 2 years of foreign service.  

2.  He was issued a DD Form 214 which shows 1 year and 4 days of foreign service in item 22c and his service in Vietnam from 12 March 1969 through 25 September 1971 in item 30.  

3.  His DD Form 214 was corrected on 11 October 1990 to properly reflect 1 year, 9 months, and 2 days of foreign service in item 22c.  However, his Vietnam service in item 30 was not corrected.  

4.  Based on the evidence of record, it would be appropriate to amend item 30 of his DD Form 214 to reflect his periods of service in Vietnam from 12 March 1969 through 6 March 1970 and 17 December 1970 through 23 September 1971.

BOARD VOTE:

__X_____  __X____  ___X____  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by:

   a.  deleting the entry “RVN:  12MAR69-25SEP71” from item 30 of his DD Form 214; and



   b.  amending item 30 of his DD Form 214 by adding the entry “RVN:  12 MARCH 1969 to 6 MARCH 1970 and 17 DECEMBER 1970 to 23 SEPTEMBER 1971.”




      __________X____________
                 CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100025546





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100025546



4


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120021325

    Original file (20120021325.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    There is no evidence of record he was issued a DD Form 214 for his period of service from 6 May 1969 through 6 February 1971. Therefore, it would be appropriate to correct his DD Form 214 to show this unit award. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: * deleting the Vietnam Service Medal from his DD Form 214 * adding the following awards to his DD Form 214 * National Defense Service Medal * Vietnam Service...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120021568

    Original file (20120021568.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides: * Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Form 21-4138 (Statement in Support of Claim), dated 22 October 2012 * Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) decision memorandum, dated 20 July 2012, and Record of Proceedings, dated 12 July 2012 * Special Orders Number 25, issued by Headquarters, U.S. Army Training Center, Infantry, Fort Ord, CA, dated 25 January 1969 * Special Orders Number 69, issued by Headquarters, 9th Infantry Division, dated 10 March 1969 *...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110011881

    Original file (20110011881.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The evidence of record shows the applicant's third tour in the Republic of Vietnam is not properly documented on his separation DD Form 214 for the period ending 14 December 1971; therefore, it would be appropriate to correct his DD Form 214 to show this foreign service. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a....

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090014320

    Original file (20090014320.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    This form also shows: a. With respect to his unit of assignment, the evidence of record shows he was assigned to the 630th Engineer Company in Vietnam within USARV. Although at the time of separation he was assigned to USAMEDDAC, Fort Gordon, GA, his DD Form 214 erroneously listed his last unit of assignment as USAREUR with the 137th Engineer Company.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110013351

    Original file (20110013351.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Item 22c of the DD Form 214 issued on 24 November 1971 shows 2 years, 4 months, and 19 days of foreign service and shows he served with U.S. Army Vietnam (USARV). The evidence of record shows the applicant was issued two DD Forms 214. The applicant is advised that he must present both of his DD Forms 214 and any associated DD Forms 215 (Correction to DD Form 214) when he is required to provide documentation of his RA service.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120006357

    Original file (20120006357.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His DD Form 214 shows in: a. item 22c (Foreign and/or Sea Service) - he completed 2 years, 2 months, and 14 days of foreign service, with an entry to see item 30 (Remarks) b. item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations, and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized): * Army Commendation Medal * National Defense Service Medal * Vietnam Service Medal * Vietnam Campaign Medal * 3 overseas service bars * Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar (M-14 and M-16) c....

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100016235

    Original file (20100016235.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) dated 4 June 1971 to show: * He had 2 years, 6 months, and 6 days of Foreign and/or Sea Service * The Army Commendation Medal * Four bronze service stars affixed to his already-awarded Vietnam Service Medal * His service in Vietnam from 14 March 1968 through 24 March 1969 2. Item 30 (Remarks) of his last DD Form 214 shows 14 March 1969 through 24 March 1969 and 26...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120012201

    Original file (20120012201.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards), in effect at the time, provided that the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded to individuals who completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service. The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 to show his service in Vietnam and his correct DOB. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal for the period 18 March...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130017381

    Original file (20130017381.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests an upgrade of his bad conduct discharge to honorable and correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Combat Infantryman Badge. The evidence of record shows the applicant was convicted by a general court-martial which sentenced him to a bad conduct discharge. His records show his service in Vietnam met the time requirements for award of the Vietnam Service Medal.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001063663C070421

    Original file (2001063663C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant’s DD Form 214 for this period of service is not present in his records. The applicant’s DD Form 214 covering his service from 12 September 1970 to 18 January 1973 is present in his records. The Board also noted that the dates of the applicant’s foreign service in Vietnam were shown on the DD Form 215 (Correction to DD Form 214), dated 3 November 2000.