BOARD DATE: 19 May 2011
DOCKET NUMBER: AR20100025313
THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:
1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).
2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant, the widow of a deceased former service member (FSM), requests correction of the FSM's records to show he elected full Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) spouse coverage.
2. The applicant states the FSM was not properly briefed when he made his SBP election and did not know about the requirement to apply for SBP within
1 year of marriage.
a. The FSM received his 20-year letter of retirement on 6 October 2000. At that time they were cohabitating but were not married. They had two children prior to marriage on 10 January 2003.
b. In January 2003, the FSM was mobilized and he served at Walter Reed Army Medical Center 1 year. He provided a copy of his marriage certificate and birth certificates prior to deployment, but he was not properly briefed regarding the inconsistencies with his SBP election.
c. On 1 December 2008, the FSM was diagnosed with Glioblastoma Metimorphe (brain cancer).
d. In November 2009, they were reviewing the FSM's retirement documents and discovered his DD Form 1883 (Survivor Benefit Plan Election Certificate) showed election of children only.
e. On 9 December 2009, they mailed a DD Form 2656-6 (Survivor Benefit Plan Election Change Certificate) to the U.S. Army Human Resources Command, St. Louis, Missouri. A certified postal card dated 19 January 2010 indicated that the DD Form 2656-6 was received.
f. On 25 December 2009, the FSM passed away. The applicant received a letter of ineligibility for an SBP annuity. The two children are currently receiving the SBP annuity.
g. the FSM gave 31 years of his life to the U.S. Army and she is sure he would want her, his widow, to be the recipient of his SBP annuity.
3. The applicant provides copies of her marriage certificate, death certificate,
DD Form 2656-7 (Verification for Survivor Annuity) dated 8 December 2010, and a letter from the National Personnel Records Center with the following enclosures:
* Letter of Retirement, dated 1 May 2006
* Letter from The Adjutant General, Virginia Army National Guard, dated
12 May 2010
* DD Form 93 (Record of Emergency Data), dated 19 June 2006
* Servicemembers' Group Life Insurance Election and Certificate, dated
19 June 2006
* DD Form 2656-6, dated 9 December 2009
* Personnel Qualification Record - Enlisted, dated in 2006
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. The available records show that the FSM initially entered the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) on 16 February 1978. His service included 3 years in the Regular Army and approximately 17 years in the USAR and Army National Guard.
2. The FSM's DD Form 1883 is not available for review.
3. The marriage certificate provided by the applicant shows she was married to the FSM on 10 January 2003.
4. On 2 September 2006, the applicant was transferred to the Retired Reserve. He had attained the rank of sergeant first class, pay grade E-7, and had completed 20 years and 6 days of qualifying service for retirement.
5. The DD Form 2656-6 provided by the applicant indicates the FSM requested a change of his SBP election from children only to spouse and children. The form appears to have the applicant's signature, two children listed with dates of birth of 6 May 1992 and 25 April 2000; and the FSM's signature. The dates were entered incorrectly, but it appears to indicate the document was completed on
9 December 2009.
6. The death certificate provided by the applicant shows the FSM died on
25 December 2009, at age 51.
7. SBP references:
a. Public Law 95-397, enacted 30 September 1978, provided a way for those who had qualified for reserve retirement but were not yet age 60 to provide an annuity for their survivors should they die before reaching age 60. Three options are available: (A) elect to decline enrollment and choose at age 60 whether to start SBP participation; (B) elect that a beneficiary receive an annuity if they die before age 60 but delay payment of it until the date of the members 60th birthday; (C) elect that a beneficiary receive an annuity immediately upon their death if before age 60. If death occurs before age 60, the RCSBP costs for options B and C are deducted from the annuity.
b. Title 10, U. S. Code, section 1448(a)(5) provides that a person who is not married and has no dependent child upon becoming eligible to participate in the SBP, but who later marries or acquires a dependent child, may elect to participate in the SBP. Such an election must be written, signed by the person making the election, and received by the Secretary concerned within one year after the date on which that person marries or acquires that dependent child.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. The applicant contends the FSM's records should be corrected to show he elected full SBP spouse coverage. The applicant also contends it was not
explained to the FSM that he needed to enroll his spouse in the SBP within
1 year of their marriage.
2. The available evidence clearly shows the applicant and the FSM had two children prior to marriage in 2003. There is no evidence showing he ever sought advice or information regarding benefits as a result of his change of marital status. Accordingly, there is no evidence available to show he was not properly counseled with regard to the 1-year requirement to enroll his spouse in the SBP.
3. It is apparent that the FSM intended to change his SBP election from child only to spouse and children. However, he submitted his election more than
6 years after their marriage, making it untimely and properly rejected.
4. Based on the above, the applicant's request should be denied.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT FULL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
__x______ ___x_____ ___x__ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.
_______ _x _______ ___
CHAIRPERSON
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20100025313
3
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20100025313
4
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090017757
The applicant submits a DD Form 1883 completed by the FSM dated 13 January 1992: * showing his status as married * listing the applicant's name as his spouse * indicating he had two dependent children * electing SBP coverage for spouse and children * electing Option C based on full amount of retired pay 11. The applicant also submits a DD Form 2656 completed by the FSM on 24 April 2006: * showing his status as married * listing the applicant's name as his spouse * electing SBP coverage for...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100013584
The applicant requests correction of the record of her deceased husband, a former service member (FSM), to show he elected spouse coverage based on full retired pay under the Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP). The applicant states the FSM elected children-only RCSBP coverage when he retired from the U.S. Army Reserve in 1987 and did not have a spouse at that time. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100006903
The applicant requests that his military records be changed to show he elected spouse and children coverage under the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP). On 27 February 2009, the applicant completed a DD Form 2656-6 and indicated that he was married and elected spouse and children SBP coverage based on the full gross pay without supplemental SBP. A DD Form 2656-5 shows that 14 September 2006 the applicant elected children only SBP coverage under Option C. He did not have a spouse at the time.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090002452
The applicant's records contain a DD Form 93 (Record of Emergency Data) which shows he had dependent children at the time he received his twenty-year letter and made no election on their behalf. The applicant provided the first two pages of a DD Form 2656-5, indicating the FSM's intentions would have been to elect to participate in the RCSBP with spouse and child coverage based on full retired pay and immediate annuity coverage at his death. The date stamp also shows that the DD Form...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140019212
The applicant states: * Army regulations in effect at the time the FSM submitted his retired pay application required the submission of a DD Form 2656 (Data For Payment of Retired Personnel) * After an exhaustive search with the U.S. Army Human Resources Command (HRC), the Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) advised her that they could not find this document * She was never counseled or provided any documentation to sign for or notarize to relinquish of the SBP * She was married to...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140010677
A Notification of Eligibility for Retired Pay at Age 60 letter, prepared on 9 July 1996, wherein the FSM was notified of completion of the required years of service and eligibility for retired pay upon application. There is no evidence of record that the FSM elected to change his SBP coverage by adding spouse coverage within 1 year of the date of his marriage to the applicant (7 December 1999). Public Law 95-397, the RCSBP, enacted 30 September 1978, provided a way for those who had...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100016746
She states she and her deceased husband, a former service member (FSM), married on 19 May 2006 and did not realize she had to be enrolled in the Reserve Component SBP (RCSBP) within 1 year of marriage until 20 November 2008 when they completed the FSM's application for retired pay. On 19 May 2006, the FSM married the applicant. Based on the FSM's election, his application for spouse SBP and/or RCSBP was denied.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120003512
BOARD DATE: 21 August 2012 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20120003512 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. Public Law 95-397, enacted 30 September 1978, provided a way for Reserve Component members who qualified for Reserve retirement, but were not yet age 60 and eligible to participate in the SBP, to provide an annuity for their survivors should they die before reaching age 60. Three options were available: * elect to decline enrollment and choose at age 60 whether to start SBP...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120010361
The DA Form 2656-6, Section III (Conditions that Trigger Eligibility to Change Coverage), Number 8 (I Am Requesting a Change in Coverage Based On:), shows the FSM marked the "Marriage" block which stated, "A member, who does not have a spouse at the time of initial eligibility, may provide SBP for the first spouse acquired after retirement by elective coverage before the first anniversary of that marriage. He and the applicant were married on 7 August 2009. The evidence of record shows her...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100022811
A DD Form 2656 (Data for Payment of Retired Personnel) provided by DFAS shows the following: * retirement date 1 October 2004 * spouse F____ * child S____ with a date of birth of 23 July 1991 * SBP election 26b, coverage for spouse and child(ren) * date signed 7 July 2004 4. DFAS stated in an email to this Board, dated 9 May 2011, the FSM's DD Form 2656 was submitted by Fort Carson on 3 November 2004 and shows he elected spouse and child(ren) coverage. The applicant and the FSM...