Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100025086
Original file (20100025086.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  4 May 2011

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20100025086 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his military records as follows:

* Add any unit awards pertaining to the 34th Signal Battalion
* Authorize him Government insurance

2.  The applicant states he has a service-connected disability for his eyes.  This condition happened while he was in the Army.  He needs to get Government insurance and also wants to add any unit citations pertaining to the 34th Signal Battalion.

3.  The applicant provides a name change court order and a letter from the Social Security Administration.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  With respect to the insurance issue, the ABCMR corrects records.  The Board considers individual applications that are properly brought before it.  In appropriate cases, it directs or recommends correction of military records to remove an error or injustice.  The issuance of Government insurance is not within the purview of this Board.  Therefore, this issue will not be discussed further in the Record of Proceedings.

3.  The applicant's records show he enlisted in the Regular Army on 20 May 1960 and held military occupational specialty (MOS) 723.10 (Teletype Operator).  Subsequent to completing MOS training, he was assigned to Company D, 34th Signal Battalion, Germany, from on or about 14 January 1961 to on or about 26 January 1962. 

4.  He was honorably released from active duty on 17 May 1963 and he was transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve Control Group (Reinforcement) to complete his remaining Reserve obligation.  His DD Form 214 shows he completed 2 years, 11 months, and 28 days of creditable active service, of which 1 year and 13 days was foreign service.

5.  Item 26 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of his DD Form 214 does not show any awards.

6.  Department of the Army Pamphlets 672-1 and 672-3 (Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register) do not list the 34th Signal Battalion as the recipient of any unit awards during the applicant's assignment to this unit.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends his records should be corrected to show any unit awards pertaining to the 34th Signal Battalion. 

2.  The applicant served with the 32nd Signal Battalion in Germany from on or about 14 January 1961 to on or about 26 January 1962.  However, during this period of service, his unit was not cited for any unit awards.  Therefore, there is insufficient evidence to award him the requested relief.




BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X___  ___X____  ____X___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      ____________X____________
                 CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100025086



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100025086



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100000516

    Original file (20100000516.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show his one year of service in the Republic of Vietnam and the receipt of any Vietnam service medals to which he is entitled as a result of this foreign service. Therefore, he is entitled to have his DD Form 214 corrected to show these unit awards. Records show he was awarded the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal for his service in the Republic of Vietnam.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100027841

    Original file (20100027841.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provided copies of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge), correspondence to and from the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR), four commendatory letters, a Marksmanship Award Ceremony handout, and a certificate of training. Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Awards), in effect at the time, stated the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded for each 3 years of continuous enlisted active Federal military service completed on or...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130009193

    Original file (20130009193.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    b. the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960) was awarded by the Government of Vietnam to all members of the Armed Forces of the United States for qualifying service in Vietnam during the period 1 March 1961 through 28 March 1973. c. the National Defense Service Medal is awarded for honorable active service for any period between 27 July 1950 and 27 July 1954, 1 January 1961 and 14 August 1974, 2 August 1990 and 30 November 1995, and 11 September 2001 and a date to be...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080016579

    Original file (20080016579.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his records be corrected to show his award of the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal (AFEM), Army Service Ribbon, and his small arms expert badge. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides, in pertinent part, that the AFEM is authorized for participants in military operations within a specific geographic area during a specified time period. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080006942

    Original file (20080006942.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 21 February 1963, the applicant’s company commander recommended the applicant’s separation from that military service under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-208. On 18 April 1963, the lieutenant colonel serving as Commander, 38th Transportation Battalion (Germany), recommended approval of the applicant’s discharge under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-208 and that the applicant be given an undesirable discharge. The applicant’s DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | AR20080006942

    Original file (AR20080006942.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 21 February 1963, the applicant’s company commander recommended the applicant’s separation from that military service under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-208. On 18 April 1963, the lieutenant colonel serving as Commander, 38th Transportation Battalion (Germany), recommended approval of the applicant’s discharge under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-208 and that the applicant be given an undesirable discharge. The applicant’s DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002077953C070215

    Original file (2002077953C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his WD AGO Form 53 (Enlisted Record and Report of Separation) to show award of the Army of Occupation Medal with Germany Clasp. The available records contain a DD Form 214 which covers the applicant's period of service from 15 October 1951 through 14 January 1952. However, evidence of record shows the applicant initially served on active duty from 15 October 1951 through 14 January 1952 and was issued a DD Form 214 for this period of service.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130011723

    Original file (20130011723.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides his: * DD Form 214 * DD Form 4 (Enlistment Record, Armed Forces of the United States) * DA Form 24 (Service Record) * DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) * Service medical and dental records CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. The records show this was for his service in Vietnam. Adding the following awards to his DD Form 214: * Army Good Conduct Medal (First Award) * Meritorious Unit Commendation (Army) * National Defense Service Medal * Armed Forces Expeditionary...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080015019

    Original file (20080015019.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 672-5-1, in effect at the time, provides that the Good Conduct Medal is awarded to individuals who have completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service. Therefore, the preponderance of evidence shows the applicant is entitled to the first award of the Army Good Conduct Medal based on completion of qualifying service from 26 October 1962 to 14 October 1965 ending with the termination of a period of Federal military service. As a result, the Board recommends that...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110009697

    Original file (20110009697.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant served a qualifying period of service for awards of the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960) and National Defense Service Medal, neither of which is shown on his DD Form 214. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by adding to item 26 of his DD Form 214 the: * Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960) * National Defense Service Medal * Meritorious Unit Commendation *...