Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100024896
Original file (20100024896.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  14 April 2011

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20100024896 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be corrected to show a more favorable reentry (RE) code. 

2.  The applicant states he "was wrongfully accused of a matter for which he did not commit."

3.  The applicant provides no additional documentation.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 3 March 2009.  The highest rank/grade he attained during his enlistment was private/pay grade E-1.  

2.  The applicant’s record is void of a separation packet containing the specific facts and circumstances surrounding his discharge processing.  The record contains a DD Form 214 showing he was discharged on 27 May 2009 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations - Enlisted Personnel), paragraph 14-12b, with an uncharacterized discharge.  

3.  His DD Form 214 shows at the time of his discharge he had completed 
2 months and 25 days of creditable active military service and he had accrued 18 days of lost time due to being AWOL.

4.  Item 26 (Separation Code) shows "JKA" and Item 27 (Reentry Code) shows "3."

5.  Army Regulation 635-200, in effect at the time, set forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.  Chapter 14 established policy and prescribed procedures for separating members for misconduct.  Specific categories include minor disciplinary infractions, a pattern of misconduct, commission of a serious offense, and convictions by civil authorities.  Action would be taken to separate a member for misconduct when it was clearly established that rehabilitation was impracticable or was unlikely to succeed.  A discharge under other than honorable conditions was normally appropriate for a Soldier discharged under this chapter.  However, the separation authority may direct a general discharge if such is merited by the Soldier’s overall record.  Only a general court-martial convening authority may approve an honorable discharge or delegate approval authority for an honorable discharge under this provision of the regulation.

6.  Army Regulation 635-200 states that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes based on their service records or the reason for discharge.  Army Regulation 601-210 (Regular Army and Army Reserve Enlistment Program) establishes eligibility criteria, policies, and procedures for enlistment and processing into the Regular Army and the U.S. Army Reserve.  Table 3-6 includes a list of the Regular Army RE codes:

	a.  RE-1 applies to Soldiers completing their term of active service who are considered qualified to reenter the U.S. Army.  They are qualified for enlistment if all other criteria are met.

	b.  RE-3 applies to Soldiers who are not considered fully qualified for reentry or continuous service at the time of separation, but the disqualification is waiverable.  They are ineligible unless a waiver is granted. 

7.  The Separation Program Designator (SPD) Code/RE Code Cross-Reference Table, dated October 2000, shows an RE code of "3" is the appropriate code to assign for the SPD code of "JKA."

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1.  The applicant requests his DD Form 214 be corrected to show a more favorable RE code. 

2.  Although the applicant's separation packet was not available, it is presumed that the Army's administrative processing of the applicant for discharge was correct. 
3.  The evidence of record shows the applicant was separated under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 due to misconduct.  An RE code 
of 3 is the appropriate code to assign individuals who are assigned an SPD code of "JKA" due to misconduct.

4.  In view of the above, his request should be denied.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X____  ___X_____  ___X_____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      _______ _   _X______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100024896



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100024896



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130012891

    Original file (AR20130012891.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 8 May 2013, the applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, voluntarily waived consideration of his case by an administrative separation board contingent upon receiving a characterization of service no less favorable than general, under honorable conditions and did not submit a statement on his behalf. However, after examining the applicant’s record of service, his military records, and the documents and issues submitted with the...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130005493

    Original file (AR20130005493.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 18 January 2000, the applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, voluntarily waived consideration of his case by an administrative separation board contingent upon receiving a characterization of service no less favorable than general, under honorable conditions and did not submit a statement on his behalf. On 7 February 2000, the separation authority approved the conditional waiver request, waived further rehabilitation and directed the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060010144C071029

    Original file (20060010144C071029.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    He cited the applicant’s NJP record for larceny and FTR, and his record of negative counseling as the basis for taking the action. On 22 October 2003, the separation authority approved the applicant's separation action and directed that he be separated under the provisions of Paragraph 14-12b, Army Regulation 635-200, by reason of a pattern of misconduct, and that he receive a general, under honorable conditions discharge (GD). The evidence of record confirms the applicant was separated...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130010976

    Original file (AR20130010976.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Prior Board Review: No SUMMARY OF SERVICE: The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 29 August 2011, for a period of 6 years and 16 weeks; however, the record reflects date entered active duty was adjusted to 17 November 2011, due to an AWOL period (120725-121011). Army Regulation 635-5-1 (Separation Program Designator (SPD) Codes) provides the specific authorities (regulatory or directive), reasons for separating Soldiers from active duty, and the SPD codes to be entered on the DD Form...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130007214

    Original file (AR20130007214.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He was discharged as a PVT/E-1. Army Regulation 635-5-1 (Separation Program Designator (SPD) Codes) provides the specific authorities (regulatory or directive), reasons for separating Soldiers from active duty, and the SPD codes to be entered on the DD Form 214. The applicant’s request for an upgrade of the characterization of his discharge, change to his SPD, RE code, and narrative reason was carefully considered.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090018974

    Original file (20090018974.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that the narrative reason and authority for discharge and its corresponding reentry eligibility (RE) code be corrected to a more favorable reason, authority and code. Army Regulation 635-200 states, in pertinent part, that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes based on their service records or the reason for discharge. Army Regulation 15-185 (Army Board for Correction of Military Records) prescribes the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120002144

    Original file (20120002144.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show item 27 (Reentry (RE) Code) as something other than "4." The "JKA" SPD code is the code for Soldiers separating under Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 14-12b, by reason of a pattern of misconduct. The evidence of record shows the applicant was approved for discharge under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 14-12b, by reason of a pattern of misconduct.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120022009

    Original file (20120022009.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Army Regulation 635-200 further states that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes based on their service records or the reason for discharge. The applicant was separated under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 14-12b; therefore, he was properly assigned the SPD code of JKA and corresponding RE code of "3" in accordance with the applicable regulations. The applicant has failed to show through the evidence submitted or the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090001249

    Original file (20090001249.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant's military records also contained a separation packet which shows that the applicant's discharge under the provisions of Paragraph 14-12b (Pattern of Misconduct), Army Regulation 635-200 (Active Duty Enlisted Administration Separations) was approved by the proper separation authority. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110013583

    Original file (20110013583.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    She applied for and received an upgrade through the Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB). At the time of the applicant's separation, the SPD code of "JKA" had a corresponding RE code of "3." Her discharge for misconduct under chapter 14-12b of Army Regulation 635-200 was correct.