Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100024715
Original file (20100024715.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  13 April 2011

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20100024715 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests:

a.  Item 22c (Foreign and/or Sea Service) of his DD Form 214 (Report of Transfer of Discharge) be corrected by adding the entry "USARVTD" [U.S. Army Vietnam Transfer Detachment]; 

b.  Item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of his DD Form 214 be corrected by adding the National Defense Service Medal, Vietnam Service Medal, Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960), Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation, Good Conduct Medal, Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar (M-16), Sharpshooter Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar (M-14), and a Certificate of Achievement; and

c.  Items 31 (Foreign Service) and 38 (Record of Assignments) of his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) be amended  

2.  The applicant states when he processed out of the Army he knew his DD Form 214 was wrong because he had been authorized to wear several ribbons on his green uniform by his commander.  When the personnel clerk handed him the discharge papers he had over 400 people behind him still waiting to be processed.  The clerk then instructed him to remain cool during transport because of the war protesters.  He contends in the 1970s no one would hire you if you put military service on your application.  When he recently applied for several administrative clerk positions his applications were rejected because he requested the 5-point military service award.  Without his DD Form 214 being corrected in item 24 he will not receive the 5-point award.      

3.  He also states:

* He did attach (signed into) but did not join the USARVTD and received combat pay of $42.87 per day prior to shipment to Thailand
* A brigadier general issued him a Certificate of Achievement which would constitute a commendation
* With regard to amending item 31 of his DA Form 20, he was not aware of the location of the operation but he participated in an operation in Laos, Cambodia, Thailand, or Vietnam  
* With regard to amending item 38 of his DA Form 20, the entry "(Vietnam)" was crossed out but without an initial and should not have been

4.  The applicant provides:

* DD Form 214
* DA Form 20

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  He was inducted into the Army of the United States on 10 September 1968.  He served as a personnel accounting specialist in Thailand and was released from active duty on 29 July 1970 and transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve Control Group (Annual Training) to complete his remaining service obligation.

3.  Item 22c of his DD Form 214 shows the entry "USARPAC [U.S. Army Pacific] 0 11 0" (11 months).  Item 24 of his DD Form 214 shows the National Defense Service Medal and Good Conduct Medal.  Since these medals are shown on his DD Form 214, this portion of his request will not be discussed further in these proceedings.   

4.  Orders, dated 25 October 1968, show he received the Sharpshooter Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar (M-14).

5.  There are no orders for the Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar (M-16) in the available records.

6.  Item 38 of his DA Form 20 shows on 8 July 1969 he was enroute to USARPAC and the entry "(Vietnam)" is crossed out.      

7.  Item 31 of his DA Form 20 shows he served in USARPAC-Thailand from 
30 August 1969 through 29 August 1970 but this end date is incorrect since he was released from active duty on 29 July 1970.  Item 38 of this form shows he departed Thailand on 28 July 1970 for the United States.  

8.  There is no evidence of record which shows the applicant served in Vietnam.

9.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Personnel Separations/Separation Forms) governed the preparation of the DD Form 214.  The regulation, in effect at the time, provided that the total active duty outside the continental limits of the United States for the period covered by the DD Form 214 and the last oversea theater in which the service was performed would be entered in item 22c.  

10.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the Vietnam Service Medal is awarded to all members of the Armed Forces of the United States for qualifying service in Vietnam after 3 July 1965 through 28 March 1973.  Qualifying service included attachment to or assignment for 1 or more days with an organization participating in or directly supporting military operations. Qualifying service also included temporary duty for 30 consecutive days or 60 nonconsecutive days in Vietnam or contiguous areas, except that the time limit may be waived for personnel participating in actual combat operations.  

11.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 states the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal was awarded by the Government of Vietnam to all members of the Armed Forces of the United States for qualifying service in Vietnam during the period 1 March 1961 through 28 March 1973.  Qualifying service included assignment in Vietnam for 6 months or more.  Qualifying service outside the geographical limits of the Republic of Vietnam required the individual to provide direct combat support to the Republic of Vietnam and Armed Forces.

12.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 states the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Unit Citation is awarded by the Vietnamese government for valorous combat achievement.

13.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 sets forth requirements for award of basic marksmanship qualification badges.  The qualification badge is awarded to indicate the degree – Expert, Sharpshooter, and Marksman -- in which an individual has qualified in a prescribed record course.  An appropriate bar is furnished to denote each weapon with which the individual has qualified.  

14.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 states only decorations, medals, and ribbons are listed.  Certificates of achievement, letters of appreciation, and similar documents are not listed.

15.  At the time, Army Regulation 600-200, chapter 9, prescribed instructions for preparing and maintaining the DA Form 20.  In pertinent part, it stated that the chapter was applicable to all enlisted personnel on active duty and all Army Reserve enlisted personnel assigned to U.S. Army Reserve troop program units.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  Evidence shows the applicant served in Thailand, in the USARPAC theater, for 11 months which is properly shown in item 22c of his DD Form 214.

2.  Although he contends he was in Vietnam, there is no evidence of record and the applicant provided no evidence (such as orders, morning reports, or pay records) which shows he served in Vietnam.  Therefore, there is insufficient evidence on which to amend his DD Form 214 to show he served in Vietnam or was entitled to any awards and decorations for service in Vietnam.

3.  There are no orders for the Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar (M-16) in the available records.  Therefore, there is insufficient evidence on which to add this marksmanship badge to his DD Form 214.  

4.  Orders show he received the Sharpshooter Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar (M-14).  His DD Form 214 should be corrected to show this badge. 

5.  The governing regulation states that certificates of achievement, letters of appreciation, and similar documents are not recorded on the DD Form 214.  Therefore, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request to show a Certificate of Achievement on his DD Form 214.

6.  The DA Form 20 was prepared and maintained for Active Army and U.S. Army Reserve enlisted personnel.  As the applicant no longer has a military status, there is no basis for making any changes to his DA Form 20.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

___X____  ____X___  ____X___  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for partial relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by adding the Sharpshooter Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar 
(M-14) to item 24 of his DD Form 214.

2.  The Board further determined that the evidence presented is insufficient to warrant a portion of the requested relief.  As a result, the Board recommends denial of so much of the application that pertains to amending item 22c of his DD Form 214; amending item 24 of his DD Form 214 to show the Vietnam Service Medal, Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960), Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation, Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar (M-16), or a Certificate of Achievement; or amending his DA Form 20.



      __________X____________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100024715





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100024715



5


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100017320

    Original file (20100017320.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    General Orders Number 21, issued by Headquarters, 40th Military Police Battalion, dated 23 October 1967, awarded him the Army Good Conduct Medal (First Award); therefore, he is entitled to correction of his DD Form 214 to show this award. Absent such evidence, he is not entitled to correction of his DD Form 214 to show award of the Vietnam Service Medal or the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960). As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140020837

    Original file (20140020837.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides copies of the following: * military records * DD Form 214 * VA Rating Decision CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. Item 30 of this DD Form 214 should also be corrected to show his Vietnam service dates. Therefore, his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show these unit awards.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090009856

    Original file (20090009856.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Item 31 (Foreign Service) he served in Thailand from 22 August 1968 through 9 August 1969, and in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN) from 1 October 1969 through 18 September 1970; c. Item 38 (Record of Assignments) that he was assigned to the: (1) U.S. Army Strategic Communications Command (USASTRATCOM) Facility, Korat [Thailand] from 26 August through 9 September 1968; (2) USASTRATCOM Facility, Korat [Thailand] and attached to the Command Communications Control Center (CCCC) [Thailand] from 10...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130018284

    Original file (20130018284.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His DD Form 214 shows in: a. item 22c (Foreign and/or Sea Service), he completed 1 year and 22 days of foreign service but does not contain the name of the major overseas theater or command, in his case, U.S. Army Pacific (USARPAC); b. item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations, and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized), the: * National Defense Service Medal * Vietnam Service Medal * Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960) c. item 30 (Remarks), no entry...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140004861

    Original file (20140004861.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) the: * Air Medal * Army Commendation Medal 2 with "V" Device (3rd Award) * National Defense Service Medal * Vietnam Service Medal with four bronze service stars * Vietnam Campaign Medal * Army Good Conduct Medal * Combat Infantryman Badge c. Item 25 (Education and Training Completed) the: *...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090004399

    Original file (20090004399.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The evidence of record shows the applicant served in Vietnam for 11 months and 22 days but the theater where he performed his foreign service is not identified on his DD Form 214. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. amending item 22c of his DD Form 214 to add "USARPAC"; and b. adding the Vietnam Service Medal with...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130019315

    Original file (20130019315.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file. The evidence of record shows he received one bronze service star. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110013894

    Original file (20110013894.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant’s qualifying period of service in Thailand is not in question; however, there is insufficient evidence that shows his service in Thailand was in direct support of operations in Vietnam. Therefore, absent any evidence indicating he or his unit served in direct support of operations in the Republic of Vietnam, the regulatory criteria necessary to support award of the Vietnam Service...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100016229

    Original file (20100016229.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Item 30 (Remarks) of his DD Form 214 does not show any service in Vietnam. Paragraph 1-31c(11) states an award for previous marksmanship weapons qualification is revoked automatically whenever an individual, upon completion of firing a record course for which the previous award was made, has not attained the same qualification. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting from item 24 of his DD Form 214...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120005979

    Original file (20120005979.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states: * his service dates in the Republic of Vietnam should be 23 February 1967 through 5 March 1968 * the period shown on his DD Form 214 conflicts with his dates of service in Germany * he enlisted in October 1962, took an early discharge in December 1963, and reenlisted for 6 years * he served in the Republic of Vietnam from 23 February 1967 through 5 March 1968 * he should have left Vietnam in February 1968; however, his departure was delayed because of the Tet...