Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100024275
Original file (20100024275.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  31 March 2011

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20100024275 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests reconsideration of his previous request for award of the Purple Heart.

2.  The applicant states, in effect, he understands the Board had difficulty finding evidence to show he was wounded in action or awarded the Purple Heart because he refused to be awarded the Purple Heart at the time for fear his wife of less than 1 year would be notified and he did not want to upset her more than she already was.  He also states he knows his medical records were burned and can only offer the evidence he has to substantiate his claim, such as photos of the area in Korea where he was wounded and the shrapnel removed from his leg.  He goes on to state he believes he meets all of the requirements for award of the Purple Heart and he has provided sufficient evidence to establish such.

3.  The applicant provides copies of:

* two pages from Department of the Army Pamphlet 21-4 (Going Back to Civilian Life)
* a letter he sent to the National Personnel Records Center (NPRC) requesting that his records be reconstructed
* an FL3-39 (Acknowledgment of Receipt of Claim), dated 1 July 1954
* a DA Form 493 (Separation Qualification Record)
* a National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) Form 13055
* a NARA Form 13075
* a page containing seven photographs
* a copy of a letter from a physician indicating that he had shrapnel removed from his leg, dated 2004
* a two-page handwritten letter from his spouse
* a one-page copy of progress notes from the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA)
* a one-page letter from the applicant explaining comments made by a third party
* an article from the Air, Land, and Sea Times.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Incorporated herein by reference are military records which were summarized in the previous consideration of the applicant's case by the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) in Docket Number AR20090009932 on 27 October 2009.

2.  The applicant's records were destroyed in the 1973 fire at the NPRC; however, the Board reviewed the available reconstructed records as well as the documents provided by the applicant in its previous consideration of his application.

3.  The applicant comes to the Board with photographs of his tank and the bunker alongside that was destroyed at the time he was wounded.  He provides photographs of shrapnel removed from his leg at the time and shrapnel removed from his leg in 2004.  He also shows a photograph of his identification tags.

4.  In many cases such as the applicant's where service records were destroyed in the 1973 fire at the NPRC, applicants have been able to obtain copies of their records from the VA in those cases where a claim was filed with the VA between the time of their separation and the 1973 fire.  In those cases, the VA made copies of the Soldier's records to assist in the adjudication of claims and in many cases provided the evidence needed, such as medical treatment records for awards of the Purple Heart.

5.  It appears that the applicant filed a claim with the VA in 1954; however, there is no evidence to show that he has submitted any copies of his military records that may be maintained by the VA that would assist in determining his entitlement to the award of the Purple Heart.

6.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained while in action against an enemy or as a result of hostile action.  Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have required treatment by medical personnel, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  While the sincerity of the applicant's claim to entitlement to award of the Purple Heart is not in doubt, he failed to provide sufficient evidence to show he meets the three requirements for award of the Purple Heart, i.e., the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound required treatment by medical personnel, and the medical treatment was made a matter of official record.

2.  The applicant's contentions and all of his supporting evidence submitted in both of his applications have been carefully considered; however, they are not sufficient to show he meets the criteria for award of the Purple Heart at this time.

3.  It is understood that it is difficult at best to provide evidence to establish his entitlement to award of the Purple Heart 50+ years after the fact, especially given that his records were destroyed.  However, the Board is not an investigative body and the burden of proof rests with the applicant to show an error or injustice has occurred.

4.  In order to justify correction of a military record, the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear that the record is in error or unjust.  The applicant failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X____  ___X____  ____X___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis to amend the decision of the ABCMR set forth in Docket Number AR20090009932, dated 27 October 2009.

2.  The Board wants the applicant and all others concerned to know this action in no way diminishes the sacrifices made by him in service to the United States during the Korean War.  The applicant and all Americans should be justifiably proud of his service in arms.



      __________X______________
                 CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100024275



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100024275



4


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090017843

    Original file (20090017843.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states, in effect, the FSM was awarded the Purple Heart in recognition of the fact that he sustained wounds to his head and hand while serving in the Republic of Vietnam. There is no evidence in the available records which show the FSM was recommended for or awarded the Purple Heart. Although the applicant contends that the FSM was wounded by shrapnel and a punji stick while serving in the Republic of Vietnam, there is no corroborating evidence present in the available...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100012235

    Original file (20100012235.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant, the widow of a deceased former service member (FSM), requests correction of the FSM's military records to show award of the Purple Heart for wounds received during World War II. The FSM's military records are not available to the Board for review. The evidence (the applicant's recounting of his service history) provided by the applicant indicates the FSM received shrapnel in his legs and left ankle.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150005097

    Original file (20150005097.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's military records are not available to the Board for review. While shoulder wounds and concussion injuries caused by enemy-generated explosions can justify award of the Purple Heart, substantiating evidence must be provided to verify the wound was the result of hostile action, it required treatment by medical personnel, and the medical treatment was made a matter of official record. The applicant has not provided substantiating evidence showing his injuries meet the strict...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120003167

    Original file (20120003167.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his WD AGO Form 53-55 (Enlisted Records and Report of Separation – Honorable Discharge) to show he was wounded in action and, therefore, entitled to award of the Purple Heart. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained while in action against an enemy or as a result of hostile action. The fact that the VA granted him a disability pension for an injury that occurred during wartime...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120003536

    Original file (20120003536.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 14 August 2012 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20120003536 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). He was awarded a Purple Heart for wounds received on 17 January 1951.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110010977

    Original file (20110010977.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 8 November 2011 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20110010977 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. c. Item 34 (Wounds Received in Action) shows "None." _______ _ __x_____ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090009932

    Original file (20090009932.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states he was wounded by shrapnel from enemy fire in Korea on 29 May 1953 and that at the time of receiving the wound, he told the medic or doctor that he did not want the Purple Heart for fear of a telegram going home to his wife. While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140000592

    Original file (20140000592.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His Certificate of Disability for Discharge, dated 19 November 1945, shows the same diagnosis as the Clinical Record Brief and adds that date of onset of injury occurred in November 1944 and he became unfit for duty 18 October 1945. The applicant states he is entitled to award of the Purple Heart for a shrapnel wound he sustained to his right leg while a Prisoner of War. Therefore, the flesh wound he received to his right ankle should be considered to be the result of "friendly fire" and,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090005756

    Original file (20090005756.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides various documentary evidence that he contends show his entitlement to award of Purple Heart based upon wounds he sustained on 24 April 1953. Item 28 (Wounds) of this form shows that during his capture, the applicant sustained wounds to his head resulting from artillery fire and to his legs resulting from grenades. This record shows the applicant was a former prisoner of enemy forces.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090006609

    Original file (20090006609.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides various documentary evidence that he contends show his entitlement to award of Purple Heart based upon wounds he sustained on 24 April 1953. Item 28 (Wounds) of this form shows that during his capture, the applicant sustained wounds to his head resulting from artillery fire and to his legs resulting from grenades. This record shows the applicant was a former prisoner of enemy forces.