Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100024251
Original file (20100024251.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	    5 April 2011

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20100024251 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, that his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge), dated 15 July 1968, be corrected to reflect in block 17c that his date of entry was 14 October 1965 (14 OCT 65). 

2.  The applicant states in effect, that his date of entry was omitted from his 
DD Form 214 at the time of release from active duty (REFRAD) on 15 July 1968.

3.  The applicant provides no additional documents with his application.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant was serving in the Regular Army in Germany in the pay grade of E-3 when he was honorably discharged on 13 October 1965 for the purpose of immediate reenlistment.

3.  On 14 October 1965, he reenlisted for a period of 3 years.  He was transferred to Vietnam on 4 July 1967 and departed Vietnam on 13 July 1968 for Oakland Army Base, California where he was honorably REFRAD as an overseas returnee.  He had served 4 years, 8 months, and 3 days of total active service and his DD Form 214 issued at the time of his REFRAD shows in block 17c (Date of Entry) “NA.”

4.  Army Regulation 635-5 serves as the authority for the preparation of the 
DD Form 214.  The regulation in effect at the time provided in pertinent part, that the date the Soldier enters active duty during the period covered by the DD Form 214 will be entered in block 17c. 

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant’s contention that his DD Form 214, dated 15 July 1968, should be corrected to reflect he entered active duty on 14 October 1965 has been noted and found to have merit.

2.  The applicant's DD Form 214 was incorrectly prepared to reflect “NA” in block 17c when it should have reflected “15 OCT 65.”

3.  Accordingly, DD Form 214, dated 15 July 1968, should be corrected to show in block 17c “15 OCT 65.”

BOARD VOTE:

____X____  __X___  ___X____  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION






BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing in block 17c of his DD Form 214 dated 15 July 1968 that his date of entry is “14 OCT 65.”

2.  The Board wants the applicant and all others to know that the sacrifices he made in service to the United States during the Vietnam War are deeply appreciated.  The applicant and all Americans should be justifiably proud of his service in arms.




      _______ _  X____   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100024251



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100024251



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110018768

    Original file (20110018768.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) be corrected to show that he was inducted on 13 May 1965 and served continuously until he was released from active duty (REFRAD) on 31 January 1968 without a break in service. His records show no evidence that a DD Form 214 was issued at the time. However, the DD Form 214 issued at the time of his REFRAD shows he had served 8 months and 23 days of active service this...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090021904

    Original file (20090021904.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). There is no evidence of record which shows the applicant was ordered to active duty on any dates other than 5 May 1965 and 13 May 1968. He was subsequently ordered to active duty for a period of 2 years on 13 May 1968 and served for a little over 16 months, which is properly reflected on his DD Form 214 for the period ending 26 September 1969.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130008625

    Original file (20130008625.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He states his DD Form 214 does not show award of the ARCOM or his date of entry. He provides Special Orders 190, dated 9 July 1967, that show his basic active service date/basic pay entry date as 18 November 1965. The evidence of record shows the applicant was inducted into the Army of the United States versus enlisting.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120010224

    Original file (20120010224.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 11 December 2012 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20120010224 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The DD Form 214 is a "snapshot in time" and is a reflection of the applicant's record of active Army service at the time of his separation from active duty. The evidence of record shows the applicant was inducted into the Army of the United States on 26 October 1965 and he was released from active duty on 25 October 1967 and transferred to the USAR after serving 2...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120021376

    Original file (20120021376.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of item 17c (Date of Entry) of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge). The applicant provides: * DD Form 214 * U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) discharge orders, dated 17 July 1974 * letter from the National Personnel Records Center, St. Louis, MO, dated 5 November 2012 CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. _____________X___________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090015464

    Original file (20090015464.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show his correct service number, period of service, the Bronze Star Medal with "V" Device, and award of the Purple Heart. The year of his date of entry is wrong because he entered service in 1965. c. He was awarded the Bronze Star Medal for heroism in Vietnam; however, the award is not correctly recorded on his separation document. There are no orders or other evidence in the applicant's military personnel records that shows he was...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140006697

    Original file (20140006697.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His DD Form 214 shows in: * Item 17c (Date of Entry) - the entry 17 September 1965 * Item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) - he was awarded or authorized the National Defense Service Medal, Parachutist Badge, Vietnam Service Medal, Bronze Star Medal, and Vietnam Campaign Medal 5. Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards), in effect at the time, provided that the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded to individuals who...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100018131

    Original file (20100018131.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) be corrected to reflect both his tours of duty in Vietnam and Ethiopia in block 22c (Foreign and/or Sea Service) and that his military education be corrected to reflect the period August 1964 to March 1965. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960) was awarded by the Government of Vietnam to all members of the Armed...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150008219

    Original file (20150008219.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The SSN the applicant states is correct (xxx-xx-9176) was recorded in his records during his service. Therefore, item 17c of his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show his date of entry year as "66" vice "666." As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by amending his DD Form 214 as follows: * delete from item 3 the existing entry and add a similar entry but with the number "9" in the sixth digit * delete from item...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090008900

    Original file (20090008900.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's DA Form 3286 (Enlistment Contract - Armed Forces of the United States) shows that he enlisted in the Regular Army on 20 June 1968. There is insufficient evidence to show that the three factors that must be exhibited to be entitled to the Purple Heart have been met in this case and he provides no evidence (such as orders that show he was awarded the Purple Heart; therefore, there is no basis for correcting his military records to show the award of the Purple Heart. As a...