Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100024223
Original file (20100024223.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  21 April 2011

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20100024223 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests upgrade of his dishonorable discharge.

2.  He states a lifetime of remorse and self-loathing has brought him to profound moral and spiritual reformation.

3.  He provides a self-authored statement and a copy of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from the Armed Forces of the United States) for the period ending 11 May 1954.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.


2.  Following a period of service in the Army National Guard, the applicant was inducted into the Army of the United States on 19 January 1954.  He was honorably discharged on 11 May 1954 and he enlisted in the Regular Army on 12 May 1954 for a period of 3 years.

3.  General Court-Martial Order Number 8, issued by Headquarters, The Engineer Center, U.S. Army, Fort Belvoir, VA, on 23 February 1955, shows he was found guilty of stealing $160.00 which was the property of a commissioned officer.  He was sentenced to be dishonorably discharged from the service, to forfeit all pay and allowances, and to be confined at hard labor for 3 years.  The portion of the sentence pertaining to confinement was reduced to 1 year by the convening authority.  The Army Board of Review affirmed the finding and sentence on 7 March 1955.

4.  General Court-Martial Order Number 371, issued by Headquarters, Camp Gordon, GA, on 22 April 1955, shows his sentence was affirmed and ordered to be executed.

5.  On 26 July 1955, the Acting Chief, Correction Division, informed the Commandant, Branch U.S. Disciplinary Barracks, Camp Gordon, GA, that the applicant's case had been considered and that restoration to duty, release on parole, and clemency were disapproved.

6.  He was dishonorably discharged effective 13 May 1955.  He completed 1 year, 9 months, and 28 days of total net service for pay purposes.

7.  In his self-authored statement, he declares:

Ever since my regrettable moral lapse as a 20-year-old man, during which I fell to the temptation to take that which did not belong to me (a $100.00 bill left in a vacant [bachelor officers' quarters] room, with door ajar), I have continuously despaired over my covetous and immoral actions.

Now, as a 76-year-old senior citizen, I have replayed this shameful act of larceny in my mind for over 50 years.  I have done my best to raise six children to become upstanding citizens of their communities.

I have lived with the bitter sense of being a hypocrite, having disciplined my own offspring as young children, for the same kinds of petty theft that their father had once committed.

God has chastened me for my sin, and has helped to free me of my guilt, as I have since lived a deeply repentant life.  I can only hope and pray for the forgiveness and restoration of men that will finally liberate my pained conscience. 

8.  Court-martial convictions stand as adjudged or modified by appeal through the judicial process.  In accordance with Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552, the authority under which the ABCMR acts, the ABCMR is not empowered to set aside a conviction.  Rather it is only empowered to change the severity of the sentence imposed in the court-martial process and then only if clemency is determined to be appropriate.  Clemency is an act of mercy or instance of leniency to moderate the severity of the punishment imposed.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The evidence of record shows no basis for upgrading the applicant's dishonorable discharge.  

2.  He was charged with an offense for which a punitive discharge could be adjudged by a court-martial.  He was convicted, and his sentence included a dishonorable discharge.  The sentence was affirmed and duly executed.

3.  Though he is undoubtedly sincere in professing shame for the theft he committed more than 50 years ago, doing so does not diminish the seriousness of this offense.  His dishonorable discharge appropriately characterizes this misconduct.

4.  Any redress by this Board of the finality of a court-martial conviction is prohibited by law.  The Board is only empowered to change a discharge if clemency is determined to be appropriate to moderate the severity of the sentence imposed.  Given the applicant's undistinguished record of service and absent any mitigating factors, the type of discharge directed and the reasons therefore were appropriate.  As a result, clemency is not warranted in this case.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X____  ___X_____  ____X____  DENY APPLICATION


BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      ___________X___________
               CHAIRPERSON

I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100024223



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100024223



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140013800

    Original file (20140013800 .txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant, the daughter of a deceased former service member (FSM), requests an upgrade of his dishonorable discharge (DD) to an honorable discharge (HD). The FSM's military records are not available for review. _______ _ x _______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130019610

    Original file (20130019610.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. Army Regulation 615-364, in effect at the time, stated an enlisted person would be dishonorably discharged pursuant only to an approved sentence of a general court-martial imposing dishonorable discharge. His conviction and sentence by general court-martial were effected in accordance with applicable law and regulations and the discharge appropriately characterizes the misconduct for which he was convicted.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110001642

    Original file (20110001642.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He departed the continental United States on 30 October 1952 and he arrived in Japan on 14 November 1952 and Korea on 16 July 1953. When authorized, it is issued to a Soldier whose military record is satisfactory but not sufficiently meritorious to warrant an honorable discharge. The applicant’s record of service included two prior court-martial convictions.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130006603

    Original file (20130006603.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Certification of Military Service he was provided, dated 7 November 2012, shows he enlisted in the Regular Army on 27 March 1951 and was dishonorably discharged on 27 April 1955. The regulation stated an enlisted person would be dishonorably discharged pursuant only to an approved sentence of a general court-martial imposing a dishonorable discharge. His available military records and the documentation submitted with his application contain no matters upon which the Board should grant...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050018219C070206

    Original file (20050018219C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 3 October 2006 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20050018219 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant’s military records are not available to the Board for review. In accordance with Title 10, United States Code, Section 1552, the authority under which this Board acts, the Army Board for Correction of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100029864

    Original file (20100029864.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests his bad conduct discharge be upgraded to honorable or general under honorable conditions. Army Regulation 615-364, in effect at the time, set forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel with dishonorable and bad conduct discharges. __________x_______________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120004850

    Original file (20120004850.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. On 27 February 1956, the U.S. Army Board of Military Review affirmed the approved findings of guilty and the sentence, except for that part of the sentence of confinement, which was modified to hard labor for 9 months. The DD Form 214 he...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 04099982C070208

    Original file (04099982C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The prosecution called a witness, one of the doctors who evaluated the applicant between 4 October and 9 October 1954, who testified that he and other medical personnel originally diagnosed the applicant as suffering from a schizophrenic reaction, a mentally ill condition; however, he stated that he changed his diagnosis on 9 October 1954 after interviewing the applicant, concluding that he knew right from wrong and that he had possession of his mental faculties – that he had no mental...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140020642

    Original file (20140020642.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's military records are not available to the Board for review. Under Secretary of Defense (Personnel and Readiness) memorandum, dated 20 September 2011, Subject: Correction of Military Records Following Repeal of Section 654 of Title 10, U.S. Code, provides policy guidance for Service Discharge Review Boards (DRBs) and Service Boards for Correction of Military/Naval Records (BCM/NRs) to follow when taking action on applications from former service members discharged under DADT...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150002759

    Original file (20150002759.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 22 September 2015 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20150002759 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests an upgrade of his bad conduct discharge (BCD). His sincerity is not in question; however, there is no evidence in the record nor did he provide evidence to support clemency.