Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100024054
Original file (20100024054.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  5 April 2011

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20100024054 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that his Reentry Eligibility (RE) code be changed so he may be allowed to reenter the U.S. Army.

2.  The applicant states his battalion commander told him he would receive an honorable discharge, but he did not tell him he would be barred from reentering the U.S. Armed Forces.  He adds he was assigned an RE code of 4 and requests that it be changed to a 2 or 3.

3.  The applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty).

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant had prior honorable active duty enlisted service in the U.S. Navy from 5 August 1986 to 4 August 1990.

3.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on16 March 1994.  Upon completion of training he was awarded military occupational specialty 44B (Metal Worker).

4.  On 18 September 1996, the applicant's commander referred the applicant to the Alcohol and Drug Abuse Prevention and Control Program (ADAPCP) for drinking and driving.

5.  On 5 November 1996, the applicant was declared an ADAPCP rehabilitation failure based on poor attendance and lack of cooperation.

6.  On 10 January 1997, the applicant's discharge under the provisions of Army Regulation (AR) 635-200 (Personnel Separations - Enlisted Separations), chapter 9 (Separation for Alcohol or Other Drug Abuse), paragraph 9-2 (Alcohol Rehabilitation Failure), was approved.  The separation authority directed that the applicant be issued an Honorable Discharge Certificate and that he not be transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve (Individual Ready Reserve).

7.  The applicant's DD Form 214 shows he was honorably discharged under the provisions of AR 635-200, chapter 9, based on alcohol rehabilitation failure.  Item 26 (Separation Code) shows Separation Program Designator (SPD) code "JPD" and item 27 (Reentry Code) shows "4."

8.  AR 601-210 (Active and Reserve Components Enlistment Program) prescribes eligibility criteria, policies, and procedures for enlistment and processing into the Regular Army, U.S. Army Reserve, and Army National Guard.  Chapter 3 prescribes basic eligibility for prior-service applicants for enlistment and includes a list of Armed Forces RE codes.  RE code 4 applies to persons separated from their last period of service with a non-waivable disqualification.  This regulation further provides that RE codes may only be changed if they are determined to be administratively incorrect.

9.  AR 635-5-1 (SPD Codes) provides the specific authorities and reasons for separating Soldiers from active duty and the SPD codes to be entered on the DD Form 214.  It shows SPD code "JPD" as the appropriate code for Soldiers separated under the provisions of AR 635-200, chapter 9, based on alcohol rehabilitation failure.  The SPD/RE Code Cross Reference Table also shows
RE code "4" as the proper RE code to assign to Soldiers with an SPD code of "JPD."

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends that his RE code of 4 should be changed to a 2 or 
3 so that he may be allowed to reenter Armed Forces.

2.  The evidence of record shows the RE code of 4 establishing the applicant's ineligibility for enlistment/reenlistment was correctly entered on his separation document in accordance with governing regulations.

3.  While the applicant's desire to serve his country is commendable, there are no provisions authorizing the change of an RE code for this purpose.

4.  In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X____  ____X____  ____X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      _______ _   _X______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100024054



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100024054



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090019616

    Original file (20090019616.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 5 December 1996, the applicant's commander recommended her for discharge under the provisions of chapter 9 of Army Regulation 635-200. Army Regulation 635-5-1 (Separation Program Designator Codes), then in effect, prescribed the specific authorities (regulatory, statutory, or other directives), the reasons for the separation of members from active military service, and the SPD's to be used for these stated reasons. Pertinent Army regulations stated that prior to discharge or release...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100008078

    Original file (20100008078.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's records show he enlisted in the Regular Army for a period of 4 years on 11 September 1997. The SPD Codes of "JPC/JPD" are the correct codes for Soldiers separated under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 9, by reason of "drug/alcohol rehabilitation failure." The evidence of record shows his RE code was assigned based on the fact that he was separated under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 9, for alcohol or other drug rehabilitation failure.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090003516

    Original file (20090003516.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 21 April 1993, the applicant was notified by his company commander that he was being processed for separation under the provisions of chapter 9 of Army Regulation 635-200 for alcohol abuse rehabilitation failure. The SPD code of JPD was the appropriate code for the applicant based on the guidance provided in this regulation for Soldiers separating under the provisions of chapter 9, Army Regulation 635-200 by reason of alcohol abuse – rehabilitation failure. In addition, evidence of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090003639

    Original file (20090003639.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's commander recommended him for discharge under the provisions of chapter 9 of Army Regulation 635-200 due to his failure to complete the ADAPCP and that he be issued a General Discharge Certificate. In a letter, dated 28 January 2009, the applicant's doctor stated the applicant had a problem with alcohol prior to being discharged from the Army and he has had no problems with alcoholism since. Pertinent Army regulations provide that prior to discharge or release from active...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110010810

    Original file (20110010810.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant was discharged on 23 February 2006 under the provisions of chapter 9, Army Regulation (AR) 635-200 for Alcohol Rehabilitation Failure. The SPD/RE Code Cross Reference Table provides instructions for determining the RE code for Active Army Soldiers and Reserve Component Soldiers. At the time of the applicant's separation, the SPD code of "JPD" had a corresponding RE code of "4."

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100026535

    Original file (20100026535.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states: * His narrative reason for separation should be changed to "Convenience of the Army" instead of "Alcohol Abuse Rehabilitation Failure" and, as a result, change of his separation code and RE code as appropriate * No supportable urinalysis existed to enroll him in the Alcohol and Drug Abuse Prevention and Control Program (ADAPCP) * The first legal urinalysis was given after he was referred to the ADAPCP solely on the basis of unjustifiable testing * His losses involved in...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080014970

    Original file (20080014970.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 13 November 2008 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20080014970 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. It also confirms he received a HD and that based on the authority and reason for his separation, he was assigned a Separation Program Designator (SPD) code of JPD and an RE code of 4. The regulation identifies the SPD code of JPD as the appropriate code to assign members separated under the provisions of chapter 9, Army Regulation 635-200, by reason of alcohol...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080012784

    Original file (20080012784.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Accordingly, the applicant was honorably discharged on 22 June 2004 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 9, for alcohol rehabilitation failure. The regulation states the reason for discharge based on separation code “JPD is “Alcohol Rehabilitation Failure” and the regulatory authority is Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 9. Pertinent Army regulations provide that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes, based on their service...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080018794

    Original file (20080018794.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant was discharged on 4 August 1995 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 9 based on alcohol rehabilitation failure. He had completed 2 years and 14 days of active military service. Pertinent Army regulations provide that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes, based on their service records or the reason for discharge.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100029384

    Original file (20100029384.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to change his separation program designator (SPD) code and his reentry eligibility (RE) code. Army Regulation 635-5-1 (Separation Program Designator Codes) provides the specific authorities and reasons for separating Soldiers from active duty and the SPD codes to be entered on the DD Form 214. The SPD code JPD was the appropriate code for the applicant based on the guidance for...