Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100023693
Original file (20100023693.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		

		BOARD DATE:	  21 April 2011

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20100023693


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his records to show he was authorized 30 percent (%) severance pay at the time of his discharge from the Army.

2.  The applicant states:

* At the time of his expiration term of service (ETS), he was not informed of his right to file a claim
* He sustained an injury to his right shoulder when he was in combat in Vietnam
* He should have received 30% severance pay as a result of being awarded the Purple Heart

3.  The applicant provides:

* A cover letter from a law firm, dated 31 August 2010
* two VISTA [Veterans Health Information Systems and Technology Architecture] Electronic Medical Documentation forms, dated 20 May 2010 and 29 June 2010
* a Western Union Telefax, dated 2 April 1970

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant was inducted into the Army of the United States on 8 April 1969.  He completed training as an infantry indirect fire crewman.

3.  He arrived in Vietnam on 6 September 1969.  On 2 April 1970, the applicant’s parents received a Western Union Telefax notifying them that he was slightly injured in action on 1 April 1970, while in Vietnam.  The telefax shows he was at an artillery firing position when the area came under attack by a hostile force.  The applicant sustained a dislocated right shoulder.  He was hospitalized and treated as a result of his injury.

4.  On 4 September 1970, the applicant was awarded the Purple Heart for the injury he sustained on 1 April 1970.

5.  The applicant departed Vietnam en route to the U.S. on 5 September 1970.  He was released from active duty (REFRAD) on 8 April 1971, at his ETS.  He was transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) Control Group (Annual Training) to complete his remaining Reserve obligation.

6.  The applicant’s records does not show that was suffering from any conditions at the time of his REFRAD that would have warranted him being processed for discharge through medical channels.

7.  The VISTA Electronic Medical Documentation the applicant submits shows he was seen by a radiologist on 20 May 2010 for right shoulder pain.  His diagnosis was normal.  On 23 June 2010, the applicant had a Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), due to right shoulder pain.  The findings of the MRI revealed mild 

degenerative arthrosis of the acromioclavicular joint without evidence of significant inferior spurring present.  Partial thickness of the rotator cuff tear of the supraspinatus and infraspinatus was noted.

8.  Title 10, U.S. Code, chapter 61, provides disability retirement or separation for a member who is physically unfit to perform the duties of his/her office, rank, grade or rating because of disability incurred while entitled to basic pay.

9.  Army Regulation 635-40 (Physical Evaluation for Retention, Retirement, or Separation) currently in effect establishes the Army Physical Disability Evaluation System (PDES) and sets forth policies, responsibilities, and procedures that apply in determining whether a Soldier is unfit because of physical disability to reasonably perform the duties of his office, grade, rank, or rating.  It provides for medical evaluation boards, which are convened to document a Soldier's medical status and duty limitations insofar as duty is affected by the Soldier's status.  A decision is made as to the Soldier's medical qualifications for retention based on the criteria in Army Regulation 40-501 (Standards of Medical Fitness).  If the medical evaluation board (MEB) determines the Soldier does not meet retention standards, the board will recommend referral of the Soldier to a physical evaluation board (PEB).

10.  Army Regulation 40-501 (Standards of Medical Fitness) governs medical fitness standards for enlistment, induction, appointment including officer procurement programs, retention, and separation including retirement.  Once a determination of physical unfitness is made, the PEB rates all disabilities.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  There is insufficient evidence to show that the applicant was suffering from any unfitting condition at the time of his REFRAD, which would have required him to be processed for discharge through medical channels.

2.  The evidence of record shows that the applicant dislocated his right shoulder while he was in Vietnam.  He was hospitalized and treated for his condition.  He continued to perform his duties until he was REFRAD at his ETS.

3.  The applicant has failed to show that the action taken by the Army in his case was incorrect.  Therefore, there is no basis for granting the applicant's requested relief.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___x__  ___x_____  ___x_____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _________x______________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090005994



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100023693



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050000936C070206

    Original file (20050000936C070206.TXT) Auto-classification: Approved

    The DD Form 214 he was issued at the time confirms he completed a total of 2 years of active military service. By regulation, in order to support award of the PH, there must be evidence to show a member was wounded in action, was treated for the wound and a record of this treatment must have been made a matter of official record. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by awarding him the Purple Heart and Army Good...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050000936C070206

    Original file (20050000936C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: DOCKET NUMBER: AR20050000936 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. By regulation, in order to support award of the PH, there must be evidence to show a member was wounded in action, was treated for the wound and a record of this treatment must have been made a matter of official record. As...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100009574

    Original file (20100009574.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Therefore, it would be appropriate to award the applicant the PH and to add it to his DD Form 214 at this time. ____________X___________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD2013 00500

    Original file (PD2013 00500.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEWNAME: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx CASE: PD1300500 BRANCH OF SERVICE: AIR FORCE BOARD DATE: 20130827 No other conditions were submitted by the MEB.The PEB adjudicated “left shoulder bidirectional instability due to left anterior labral tear and type II SLAP tear”as unfitting, rated 20%,with cited application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD).The CI made no appeals, and was medically separated. Although there was...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100026496

    Original file (20100026496.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). He further provided medical progress notes, printed on 31 August 2010, which stated he was in the process of a medical board for a left shoulder injury and pain from a right hernia repair. Army Regulation 635-40, then in effect, established the Army physical disability evaluation system and set forth policies, responsibilities, and procedures that apply in determining whether a Soldier was unfit...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD2013 00131

    Original file (PD2013 00131.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The MEB forwarded right shoulder pain s/p arthroscopic subacromial decompression and distal clavicle excision to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501.The MEB also identified and forwarded left ankle pain as medically acceptable.The PEBadjudicated the chronic right shoulder pain as unfitting, rated 0%with specified application of the US Army Physical Disability Agency (USAPDA) pain policy.The left ankle pain condition was determined to meet retention standards and thereforewas...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD 2011 00094

    Original file (PD 2011 00094.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Left Shoulder Condition . The VA rated the left shoulder at 10% coded 5203 (scapular impairment) citing “limited or painful motion.” The ROM values reported by the MEB and VA examiner, performed 3 months before separation and a month after separation, are significantly worse than those reported by orthopedics dated 6 months prior to separation. The shoulder limited ROM at 90 degrees supports the minimum rating under code 5201 (arm; limitation of motion).After due deliberation, considering...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080004884

    Original file (20080004884.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) with the period ending 21 November 1967 to show award of two Purple Hearts [correctly known as the Purple Heart First Oak Leaf Cluster] and the Bronze Star Medal with "V" Device. Evidence of record shows the applicant was awarded the Bronze Star Medal with "V" Device. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090019324

    Original file (20090019324.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Army Regulation 635-40 (Physical Evaluation for Retention, Retirement, or Separation) governs the evaluation of physical fitness of Soldiers who may be unfit to perform their military duties because of physical disability incurred while entitled to basic pay. Although the applicant contends he should have gone through medical processing since his injury occurred on active duty, the available evidence shows his medical condition did not render him medically unfit or unable to meet retention...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080017092

    Original file (20080017092.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Item 25 (Selected Administrative Data) of this form shows the applicant was awarded the Purple Heart by 12th Evacuation Hospital, General Order 234, dated 6 October 1968. Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards), in effect at the time, provides that the Good Conduct Medal is awarded to individuals who have completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected to show...