Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100023667
Original file (20100023667.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		

		BOARD DATE:	  17 March 2011

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20100023667 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests the Valorous Unit Award (VUA) be added to his record and DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge).  

2.  The applicant states the unit he served with in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN) between 5 January and 17 November 1967 was recently awarded the VUA for the period 16 July 1967 through 31 December 1968 and he would like this award added to his DD Form 214. 

3.  The applicant provides VUA orders, pages 3 and 4 of his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record), and his DD Form 214.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.
2.  The available record shows the applicant served in the Army of the United States from 18 May to 23 May 1966 until he was separated for immediate enlistment.  He enlisted in the Regular Army on 24 May 1966.  He was trained in and awarded military occupational specialty (MOS) 44C (Welder) and specialist five (SP5)/E-5 is the highest rank he attained while serving on active duty. 

3.  The applicant's DA Form 20 shows he served in the RVN from 2 May 1967 through 27 April 1968.  Item 38 (Record of Assignments) shows that during his RVN tour he served with the 137th Engineer Company from 5 January through 17 November 1967 and with Company A, 815th Engineer Battalion from 
18 November 1967 through 27 April 1968.  

4.  On 23 May 1969, the applicant was honorably released from active duty (REFRAD), in the rank of SP5/E-5, after completing 3 years and 6 days of active military service.  Item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of the DD Form 214 he was issued upon his REFRAD shows he earned the following awards during his active duty tenure:

* Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar
* National Defense Service Medal
* Vietnam Service Medal (VSM)
* RVN Campaign Medal (RVNCM) with 1960 Device
* two overseas service bars
* Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM)

5.  A review of the previously approved unit award list maintained by the Military Awards Branch, U.S. Army Human Resources Command, confirms the 137th Engineer Company was awarded the VUA for the period 16 July 1967 through 
31 December 1968, and that the Department of the Army General Order (DAGO) is pending.  It further confirms this award is authorized to be added to a Soldier's uniform/record.  

6.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) contains the Army's awards policy.  Paragraph 2-13 contains guidance on the VSM.  It states a bronze service star is authorized with this award for each campaign a member is credited with participating in while serving in the RVN.  



7.  Table B-1 of the awards regulation contains a list of campaigns and shows that during the applicant's tenure of assignment in the RVN, participation credit was granted for the following campaigns:
* Vietnam Counteroffensive Phase II (1 July 1966 - 31 May 1967)
* Vietnam Counteroffensive Phase III (1 June 1967 - 29 January 1968)
* Tet Counteroffensive (30 January - 1 April 1968)
* Vietnam Counteroffensive Phase IV (2 April 1968 - 30 June 1968) 
8.  DAGO Number 8, issued in 1974, announced award of the RVN Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation for service in the RVN between 8 February 1962 and 28 March 1973.  

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's contention that the VUA should be added to his DD Form 214 has been carefully considered and found to have merit.  

2.  The evidence of record confirms the applicant served with the 137th Engineer Company from 5 January through 17 November 1967 and that the unit recently was awarded the VUA for the period 16 July 1967 through 31 December 1968.  As a result, it would be appropriate to add this award to his record and DD Form 214. 

3.  The evidence also confirms that based on the applicant's service and campaign participation in the RVN the applicant is eligible for the RVN Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation and four bronze service stars to be worn with his VSM.  Therefore, it would also be appropriate to add these awards to his 
DD Form 214.

BOARD VOTE:

___x____  ____x___  ____x___  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION



BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by 
amending item 24 of his DD Form 214 by:

* Deleting the "VSM"
* Adding the VSM with four bronze service stars, VUA, and Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation 




      _______ _   x_______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100023667



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100023667



4


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110000809

    Original file (20110000809.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Records show he participated in four campaigns during his service in the RVN. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting the VSM from his DD Form 214; b. adding the VSM with four bronze service stars, VUA, MUC, and RVN Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation to his DD Form 214; and c. providing him a document to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100014343

    Original file (20100014343.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Records show the applicant participated in four campaigns during his service in the RVN. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting the VSM with two bronze service stars from his DD Form 214; b. awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st award) for the period 12 November 1965 to 8 November 1968; c. adding the ARCOM, VUA, Army Good Conduct Medal (1st award), VSM with four bronze service stars, and the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100019135

    Original file (20100019135.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-3 (Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register) provides for award of the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation to all units that served in Vietnam between 20 July 1965 and 28 March 1973 which were subordinate to Headquarters, U.S. Army Vietnam, by Department of the Army General Orders (DAGO) Number 8, dated 1974. Therefore, his records should be corrected to show this award. As a result, the Board recommends that all...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090007943

    Original file (20090007943.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Item 31 (Foreign Service) of the applicant's DA Form 20 shows he served in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN) from 11 February 1968 through 9 February 1969; and again from 5 October 1970 through 4 October 1971. Therefore, it would also be appropriate to add these awards to his record and DD Form 214 at this time. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by amending item 24 of his 4 October 1971 DD Form 214 by adding the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110009509

    Original file (20110009509.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's military record contains a DD Form 215 (Correction to the DD Form 214), dated 13 December 2006. The evidence of record confirms the RVN Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation was added to the applicant's DD Form 214 when a DD Form 215 was issued on 13 December 2006. The Board further determined the evidence presented is insufficient to warrant a portion of the requested relief.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090003027

    Original file (20090003027.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states, in effect, he was awarded the PH on 10 May 1968; three Army Commendation (ARCOM) medals with "V" (Valor) Device for heroism on 31 January, 9 May, and 16 August 1968; and the BSM on 17 November 1968. The evidence of record confirms that the applicant was wounded in action in the RVN on 9 May 1968, as evidenced by an entry in item 40 of his DA Form 20, the ARCOM with "V" Device orders for 9 May 1968 on file in his OMPF, an entry on the Vietnam Casualty Roster, and by the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100023505

    Original file (20100023505.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states, in effect, his unit in Vietnam was awarded the VUA on 9 September 2009 in Permanent Orders 252-09 and he desires that it be added to his records. On 2 May 1967, he was transferred to Vietnam with his unit. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: * deleting the VSM from block 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations, and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of his DD Form...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090010204

    Original file (20090010204.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Item 41 (Awards and Decorations) of the applicant's DA Form 20 shows that during his active duty tenure he earned the National Defense Service Medal (NDSM), Vietnam Service Medal (VSM), Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal (RVNCM) with Device (1960), Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM), Air Medal (AM), CIB, Marksman Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle (M-14 and M-16) and Machinegun (M-60) Bars, and two overseas service bars. Thus, these awards should also be added to his record and DD...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090015287

    Original file (20090015287.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence of record shows the applicant served in the RVN from 27 July 1967 to 4 June 1968. His DD Form 214 only reflects one overseas service bar; therefore, his records should be corrected accordingly. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting from item 24 of his DD Form 214 the Vietnam Service Medal and one overseas service bar; b. adding to item 24 of his DD Form 214 the Army Good Conduct Medal...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110005343

    Original file (20110005343.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states: a. it is very disturbing to know his service to his country, in a place that can only be described as "hell on earth," was not correctly documented thereby causing his entitlements to be questioned; b. he has an official photograph showing that he received the Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM); he was wearing the CMB and the rank of specialist five (SP5) which is contrary to the Board's Record of Proceedings (ROP) which indicates the highest rank he attained was private...