Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100023508
Original file (20100023508.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  10 March 2011

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20100023508 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests reconsideration of his previous request for award of the Purple Heart and correction of item 3 (Grade) of his WD AGO Form 53-55 (Enlisted Record and Report of Separation – Honorable Discharge) to show his rank as sergeant.

2.  As a new evidence, the applicant states that photographs taken in Germany of him and his men and a newspaper article that refers to him by name as "sergeant" show he was a sergeant and the records the Army has are incorrect.  In addition, the records that show he was treated for gastritis and tonsillitis do not tell the real reason he was hospitalized.  He further states he sustained a chest hit from shrapnel and a small hit on his ankle.  In his previous request he stated a medic treated his ankle quickly then he was transported to the hospital in France.  The picture he is including with his application shows the five nurse's aides who took care of him while he was in the hospital in France.  He hopes the Army Board of Correction for Military Records (ABCMR) will take a newer approach and conduct a better investigation.

3.  The applicant provides copies of his WD AGO Form 53-55, his Honorable Discharge Certificate, six photographs, and a newspaper article.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Incorporated herein by reference are military records which were summarized in the previous consideration of the applicant's case by the ABCMR in Docket Number AR20090021222 on 24 June 2010.

2.  The applicant's military records are not available to the Board for review.  A fire destroyed approximately 18 million service members' records at the National Personnel Records Center in 1973.  It is believed that the applicant's records were lost or destroyed in that fire.  However, there were sufficient documents remaining in a reconstructed record for the Board to conduct a fair and impartial review of this case.

3.  The applicant was inducted into the Army of the United States and entered active duty on 28 September 1944 and held military occupational specialty 761 (Scout).  He served in the European theater of operations from 4 March 1945 through 13 July 1946. 

4.  He was honorably discharged on 31 July 1946.  The WD AGO Form 53-55 he was issued shows the following entries:

* Item 3 – "T/4" [technician four]
* Item 33 (Decorations and Citations) – "World War II Victory Medal, Army of Occupation Medal, Distinguished Unit Badge, Good Conduct Medal, European-African Middle Eastern Campaign Medal"
* Item 34 (Wounds Received in Action) – "None"
* Item 39 (Highest Grade Held) – "T/4"

5.  There is no evidence in the reconstructed records that shows the applicant was awarded the Purple Heart or was wounded as a result of hostile action during World War II.

6.  There are no orders in the available record which show he was promoted to sergeant.

7.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of hostile action.  Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify that the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have required treatment by medical personnel, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record.

8.  War Department Technical Manual 12-236 (Preparation of Separation Forms), in effect at the time, provides that the appropriate separation form will be prepared for all enlisted personnel separated from the service by reason of discharge, retirement, release from active duty, or transfer to a Reserve 


Component.  This manual states that item 3 shows the grade held by the enlisted member at the time of separation and item 38 shows the highest grade held by the enlisted member during current period of active duty.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  Notwithstanding the applicant's sincerity, there is no evidence in the available records that shows he was awarded the Purple Heart or was wounded as a result of hostile action during World War II.  Regrettably, there is still insufficient evidence on which to base award of the Purple Heart in this case.

2.  He contends Item 3 of his WD AGO Form 53-55 should be corrected to show his rank as sergeant.  However, there are no orders which show he was promoted to sergeant.  It is possible that he was made an acting sergeant, but there is no evidence to show he was promoted to sergeant.  In the absence of promotion orders, the photographs he provided are insufficient as a basis for amending item 3 of his WD AGO Form 53-55 to show his rank as sergeant.

3.  The ABCMR considers individual applications that are properly brought before it.  In appropriate cases, it directs or recommends correction of military records to remove an error or injustice.  The ABCMR begins its consideration of each case with the presumption of administrative regularity.  The applicant has the burden of proving an error or injustice by a preponderance of the evidence.  The ABCMR decides cases on the evidence of record.  It is not an investigative body.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X____  ___X___  ___X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined the overall merits of this case are 


insufficient as a basis to amend the decision of the ABCMR set forth in Docket Number AR20090021222, dated 24 June 2010.



      _______ _   X_______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100023508



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100023508



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100008852

    Original file (20100008852.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction to his WD AGO Form 53-55 (Enlisted Record and Report of Separation – Honorable Discharge) to show award of the Purple Heart and his unit of assignment as Company C, 264th Engineer Battalion. The applicant's WD AGO Form 53-55 shows that no combat wounds were recorded on his separation document. While the applicant did provide two military forms showing he had an authorized absence from Company C, 264th Engineer Battalion in September and October 1945, these...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070017312

    Original file (20070017312.TXT) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show award of the Purple Heart. On 28 October 1991, by letter, the U.S. Army Reserve Personnel Center, St. Louis, Missouri, informed the applicant that a review of his medical and clinical records showed he was hospitalized for frostbitten feet and that he met the criteria for entitlement to award of the Purple Heart. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a....

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100010461

    Original file (20100010461.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    A review of hospital admission data in the SGO files did not reveal any records indicating the FSM received a shrapnel wound to his knee or that he was otherwise wounded as a result of enemy action. The newspaper clipping shows the FSM was entitled to wear the insignia for the Meritorious Service Unit Plaque (later renamed the Meritorious Unit Commendation (MUC)) and was awarded the Army Good Conduct Medal, Purple Heart, Combat Infantryman Badge, and five battle stars. The applicant's...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110013444

    Original file (20110013444.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's military records are not available to the Board for review. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained in action against an enemy or as a result of hostile action. Regrettably, absent evidence which conclusively shows he sustained wounds or injuries as a result of hostile action, that he was treated by medical personnel for those wounds or injuries, and that this treatment was made a matter of official record,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140017017

    Original file (20140017017.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of the records of his deceased father, a former service member (FSM), to show he was wounded in action and awarded the Purple Heart. He also requests, in effect, correction of the FSM's WD AGO Form 53-55 (Enlisted Record and Report of Separations – Honorable Service) to show: * the FSM's prisoner of war (POW) status * Purple Heart and POW Medal 2. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100015655

    Original file (20100015655.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant, the daughter of a deceased former service member (FSM), requests the FSM's record be corrected to show award of the Purple Heart. The applicant provides the following documentary evidence on behalf of her deceased father: a. FSM's death certificate; b. WD AGO Form 53-55 (Enlisted Record and Report of Separation-Honorable Discharge) for the period ending 29 December 1945; c. WD AGO Form 100 (Separation Qualification Record); d. FSM's honorable discharge certificate; e. Western...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110018725

    Original file (20110018725.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His WD AGO Form 53-55 further shows in: * item 6 (Organization) the entry "Co G, 22nd Infantry, 4th Division" * item 31 (Military Qualification and Date) the entry "Combat Infantryman Badge – 1 November 1944" * item 32 (Battles and Campaigns) the: * Campaign of Normandy * Campaign of Belgium * Campaign of Germany * item 33 (Decorations and Citations) the: * Three Bronze Battle Stars * Army Good Conduct Medal * Purple Heart with One Oak Leaf Cluster * European Theater of Operations...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110010888

    Original file (20110010888.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His WD AGO Form 53-55 shows in: * Item 6 (Organization) he was assigned to Company E, 325th Glider Infantry Regiment, 82nd Airborne Division * Item 7 (Date of Separation) he was honorably discharged on 19 December 1945 * Item 30 (Military Occupational Specialty (MOS) and Number) he held MOS 745 (Rifleman) * Item 32 (Battles and Campaigns) he participated in the Rhineland, Ardennes, Central Europe, and Normandy campaigns * Item 33 (Decorations and Citations) he was awarded: * Bronze Stars (5)...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002076696C070215

    Original file (2002076696C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    In the absence of evidence to explain either wounding, the Board will assume for purposes of correcting his records, that he was wounded on both 17 July and 8 August 1944, and award him a Purple Heart for each wound. Consequently, there is no basis for the Board to consider awarding him the POW Medal. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing that the individual concerned was awarded the Purple Heart with 1 st Oak Leaf Cluster, for wounds...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090004882

    Original file (20090004882.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    However, there is insufficient evidence to grant him the Purple Heart in this case. However, chronicles of events which were prepared and/or are submitted more than 60 years after the fact do not by themselves conclusively prove the applicant was wounded or injured as a result of hostile action. Regrettably, absent evidence which conclusively shows that the applicant sustained wounds or injuries as a result of hostile action, that he was treated by medical personnel for those wounds or...