Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100023124
Original file (20100023124.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  3 May 2011

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20100023124 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests adjustment of his effective date of promotion to chief warrant officer two (CW2) to match his date of rank (DOR).

2.  The applicant states he was promoted to CW2 8 months after his DOR.  He would like to recoup the back pay lost as a result of this delay. 

3.  The applicant provides promotion orders to CW2 and an email from the U.S. Army Human Resources Command (HRC). 

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Having had prior enlisted service, the applicant was appointed as a Reserve warrant officer and he executed a DA Form 71 (Oath of Office - Military Personnel) on 7 September 2006 with concurrent call to active duty for a 6-year active duty commitment. 

2.  He entered active duty on 7 September 2007, completed the Warrant Officer Basic Course from 11 September 2006 through 13 October 2006, and he was awarded military occupational specialty 311A (Criminal Investigation Command (CID) Special Agent).  He was honorably discharged from active duty on 13 December 2007 by reason of disability with severance pay.

3.  He was appointed to the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) Control Group on 10 January 2009 and he was reassigned to the 425th Military Police (MP) Detachment on 29 January 2009.  He was then reassigned to the 399th MP Detachment on 10 June 2009.

4.  On 19 September 2009, he was ordered to active duty under contingency operations for active duty operational support and he was assigned to the U.S. Army Protective Service Battalion, Fort Belvoir, VA.

5.  On 24 June 2010, HRC, St. Louis, MO, published Orders B-06-004143 promoting him to CW2 with an effective date of 24 June 2010 and a DOR of
29 October 2009.  He was honorably released from active duty in the rank of CW2 on 18 September 2010 by reason of completion of his required active service.  

6.  He submitted an email, dated 24 June 2010, wherein an HRC official notified him that "he was appointed on 7 September 2006 and he was discharged on 13 November 2007.  He had a break in service of 1 year, 2 months, and 6 days.  He was reappointed on 5 June 2009 with the break in service subtracted from his appointment date for an adjusted DOR of 29 October 2007.  Promotion to CW2 required 2 years TIG, which equates to a DOR of 29 October 2009."

7.  In the processing of this case, on 16 March 2011, an advisory opinion was obtained HRC, Fort Knox, KY.  The advisory official stated that the request to adjust the effective date could not be supported.  The applicant's current effective date as it relates to pay is the earliest date that could have been awarded in accordance with Army Regulation 135-155 (Promotion of Commissioned Officers and Warrant Officers other Than General Officers), paragraph 4-15.  The regulation states that the effective date is the later date of the promotion memorandum (order) or the day following completion of the time in grade (TIG) requirements.  The applicant was granted prior service credit that exceeded the TIG requirements.  Receipt of a promotion action by his administrative center upon the applicant's reappointment could have led to that date or 29 October 2009 date, whichever was later.

8.  On 16 March 2011, a copy of the advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for information and to allow him the opportunity to submit comments or a rebuttal.  He did not respond.

9.  Army Regulation 135-155 provides policy for selecting and promoting commissioned officers of both the Army National Guard of the United States (ARNG) and the USAR, and warrant officers of the USAR.  Paragraph 4-15b (Dates of promotion) states except as noted elsewhere in this regulation, the effective date of promotion for commissioned officers (except commissioned warrant officers) may not precede the date on which the promotion memorandum is issued.  For warrant officers, the effective date is the later of the date of the promotion memorandum or the day following the date the officer completes the TIG requirements.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The evidence of record shows he was appointed a WO on 7 September 2006 and he was discharged on 13 November 2007.  He had a break in service of 1 year, 2 months, and 6 days.  Upon his reappointment on 5 June 2009, the break in service was subtracted from his appointment date thus giving him an adjusted DOR of 29 October 2007.

2.  Promotion to CW2 requires 2 years TIG.  Therefore, his DOR is correctly shown as 29 October 2009.  For warrant officers, the effective date is the later of the date of the promotion memorandum or the day following the date the officer completes the TIG requirements.  His promotion memorandum was issued on 24 June 2010.  Therefore, his effective date of promotion to CW2 is correctly shown as 24 June 2010. 

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X____  ___X_____  ___X_____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      ___________X___________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100023124



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100023124



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120006743

    Original file (20120006743.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He understood that if he declined promotion while on active duty, once he completed the course requirements, his DOR would be back dated to the original date of promotion on active duty in accordance with National Guard Regulation 600-101 (Warrant Officers – Federal Recognition and Related Personnel Actions) to keep him on track with his peers. He provides * Declination of Promotion memoranda * 2006 CW3 promotion orders * Revocation of CW3 promotion orders * DD Form 214 (Certificate of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120005898

    Original file (20120005898.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Because this regulatory degree requirement did not provide an exception for officers who were appointed to the rank of CPT before 1 October 1995, it failed to implement the baccalaureate degree exception that is required by Title 10, USC, section 12205(b)4. c. The SSB recommended him for promotion to MAJ and informed him that he had one of the following options depending on his current status: * if he had been discharged or retired, he could request voidance of the discharge or retirement...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140008409

    Original file (20140008409.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Entry Grade Credit consists of prior commissioned service (including active duty for training (ADT) and commissioned service in an active status in the RC, and CSC). The evidence of record shows the applicant was - * promoted to CPT (O-3) with a DOR of 1 September 2004 * appointed as a Chaplain in the NHARNG and ARNGUS on 1 March 2010 with his CPT DOR established as 1 March 2010 * appointed in the RA in the rank of CPT (Chaplain) on 22 August 2011 with his ADOR established as 1 March...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130020423

    Original file (20130020423.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states: a. By Army Regulation 135-155, he was not required to attend WOAC for promotion to CW3. By regulation, as an aviation WO in the ARNG, completion of WOAC was required before he could be promoted to CW3 in the AZARNG.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120022354

    Original file (20120022354.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Army Regulation 135-155 (Promotion of Commissioned Officers and Warrant Officers Other Than General Officers), paragraph 2-5d, specifies "Warrant officers serving in a grade below chief warrant officer four (CW4), in an active Reserve status, may be selected for promotion provided they meet the minimum promotion time in grade (TIG) and military education requirements in Table 2-3 (Warrant Officer TIG and Military Education Requirements) not later than the date the selection board convenes." ...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130013309

    Original file (20130013309.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    She was appointed in the rank of captain because of her prior service commissioned time. Once the 5 years and 18 days of constructive credit is subtracted from her initial appointment date, her new DOR becomes 10 October 2005. c. The result of following the instructions in Tables 3-3 and 3-4 of Army Regulation 135-100 is proof that the requested relief is warranted. Notwithstanding the NGB Advisory Opinion recommendation, it appears she should have been credited with a total of 2 years, 9...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120019774

    Original file (20120019774.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Due to unit transfers, paperwork mishandling, and processing times, his promotion did not occur until 23 July 2012 with a DOR of 13 July 2012. b. His packet was approved by the State promotion board on 16 March 2012 and he was granted Federal recognition for CW2 on 23 July 2012 with a DOR of 13 July 2012. The evidence of record confirms the applicant was appointed as a WO1 in the MOARNG on 7 December 2007 and that he met the minimum time-in-grade and education requirements and was fully...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130001458

    Original file (20130001458.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence of record shows the applicant was: * promoted to MAJ (O-4) on 20 April 2007, discharged from the RA on 2 July 2007, and incorrectly placed in the IRR on 3 July 2000 * from 3 July 2007 through 15 February 2012 in an inactive status (according to HRC) or in no military status (based on his DD Form 214/discharge orders) * appointed as a Reserve officer in grade O-4 on 16 February 2012 3. In addition, as a result of this correction, any evidence of the applicant's non-selection for...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100000918

    Original file (20100000918.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's military records show he was appointed as a Reserve commissioned officer in the rank of second lieutenant on 23 May 1992 and entered active duty. The Chief, Personnel Division, NGB, further indicated that because the applicant was promoted to CPT on 1 June 1996, was selected for promotion to MAJ by a mandatory selection board on 4 April 2003, was mobilized to Afghanistan on 5 August 2003, was released from active duty on 4 August 2004, and resigned his commission on 15 March...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110022153

    Original file (20110022153.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests adjustment of her captain date of rank (DOR) to 24 February 2002 and promotion consideration to major by a special selection board (SSB). 2008-03-02 day prior to reappointment in ARNG 2006-12-12 day following discharge date from USAR-Reinforcement 1-02-20 subtotal +1 provides for inclusive dates 1-02-21 period of civilian break 2000-12-01 effective date and DOR for promotion to captain on active duty 2002-02-22 adjusted DOR to captain 4. As a result, the Board...