BOARD DATE: 10 March 2011
DOCKET NUMBER: AR20100022763
THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:
1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).
2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Combat infantryman Badge, Air Medal, and Army Commendation Medal.
2. He states it was at the end of the Vietnam War and things were out of order.
3. He provides no additional documents.
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicants failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicants failure to timely file. In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.
2. The applicant was inducted into the Army of the United States on 18 March 1970. He completed the training requirements and he was awarded military occupational specialty (MOS) 11B (Light Weapons Infantryman). The highest rank/grade he attained was specialist four (SP4)/E-4.
3. He served in Vietnam from 21 August 1970 to 20 August 1971 and performed duties as a rifleman and automatic rifleman in MOS 11B.
4. His DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows in:
a. Item 38 (Record of Assignments) he was assigned to Company D, 2nd Battalion (Airmobile), 502nd Infantry Regiment from 1 February to 19 May 1971 and Headquarters and Headquarters Company, 101st Airborne Division (Airmobile) from 20 May to 16 August 1971.
b. Item 41 (Awards and Decorations) doesnt list the Combat Infantryman Badge, Air Medal, or Army Commendation Medal.
5. His service record does not contain any flight records or orders for award of the Combat Infantryman Badge, Air Medal, or Army Commendation Medal.
6. Review of the Awards and Decorations Computer-Assisted Retrieval System (ADCARS), an index of general orders issued during the Vietnam era between 1965 and 1973 maintained by the Military Awards Branch of the United States Army Human Resources Command, shows he was awarded the Army Commendation Medal for meritorious achievement from 1 February to 1 July 1971 by Headquarters, 101st Airborne Division (Airmobile), General Orders Number 9730, dated 5 October 1971.
7. ADCARS failed to reveal any orders for award of the Air Medal pertaining to the applicant.
8. He was released from active duty on 23 November 1971 in the rank of SP4. He completed 1 year and 8 months of active military service. His DD Form 214 shows 6 days of lost time.
9. Item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of his DD Form 214 shows the National Defense Service Medal and Vietnam Service Medal with two bronze service stars.
10. References:
a. Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-3 (Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register) lists the unit awards received by units serving in Vietnam. This pamphlet shows that at the time of the applicant's assignment to Headquarters and Headquarters Company, 101st Airborne Division, this unit was cited for award of the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation for the period 18 April to 31 August 1971 by Department of the Army General Orders 6, dated 1974.
b. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the Combat Infantryman Badge is awarded to infantry officers and to enlisted and warrant officer persons who have an infantry MOS. They must have served in active ground combat while assigned or attached to an infantry unit of brigade, regimental or smaller size.
c. Army Regulation 600-8-22 states the Air Medal is awarded in time of war for heroism and for meritorious achievement or service while participating in aerial flight. This award is primarily intended for personnel on flying status but may also be awarded to those personnel whose combat duties require them to fly; for example, personnel in the attack elements of units involved in air-land assaults against an armed enemy. As with all personal decorations, formal recommendations, approval through the chain of command, and announcement in orders are required.
11. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1130, provides the legal authority for consideration of proposals for decorations not previously submitted in a timely fashion. It allows, in effect, that upon the request of a Member of Congress, the Secretary concerned shall review a proposal for the award or presentation of a decoration (or the upgrading of a decoration), either for an individual or a unit, that is not otherwise authorized to be presented or awarded due to limitations established by law or policy for the timely submission of a recommendation for such award or presentation. Based upon such review, the Secretary shall make a determination as to the merits of approving the award or presentation of the decoration.
12. The request, with a DA Form 638 (Recommendation for Award), must be submitted through a Member of Congress to the Secretary of the Army at the following agency: Commander, U.S. Army Human Resources Command, ATTN: AHRC-PDP-A, 1600 Spearhead Division Avenue, Fort Knox, KY 40122. The applicant's unit must be clearly identified along with the period of assignment and the award being recommended. A narrative of the actions or period for
which recognition is being requested must accompany the DA Form 638. Requests for consideration of awards should be supported by sworn affidavits, eyewitness statements, certificates, and related documents. Corroborating evidence is best provided by commanders, leaders, and fellow Soldiers who had personal knowledge of the circumstances and events relative to the request. The burden and costs for researching and assembling documentation to support approval of requested awards and decorations rest with the requestor.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. The evidence of record shows the applicant completed infantry training and he was awarded MOS 11B. He was assigned to Company D, 2nd Battalion (Airmobile), 502nd Infantry Regiment, as a rifleman during his tour of duty in Vietnam. However, his service record does not contain sufficient evidence that shows he was engaged in actual ground combat while assigned to an infantry unit in Vietnam. Therefore, he has not met all the requirements for award of the Combat Infantryman Badge.
2. The applicants service record does not contain any flight records or orders for award of the Air Medal. Therefore, there is insufficient evidence in which to award him the Air Medal.
3. While the available evidence is insufficient for awarding the applicant an Air Medal, this in no way affects his right to pursue his claim for the Air Medal by submitting a request through his Member of Congress under the provisions of Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1130.
4. General orders show he was awarded the Army Commendation Medal for meritorious achievement from 1 February to 1 July 1971. Therefore, this award should be added to his DD Form 214.
5. He was assigned to Headquarters and Headquarters Company, 101st Airborne Division when this unit was cited for award of the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation. Therefore, this foreign unit award should be added to his DD Form 214.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT FULL RELIEF
__x______ ___x____ ____x___ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
1. The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for partial relief. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by amending item 24 of his DD Form 214 by adding award of the Army Commendation Medal and Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation.
2. The Board further determined that the evidence presented is insufficient to warrant a portion of the requested relief. As a result, the Board recommends denial of so much of the application that pertains to award of the Combat Infantryman Badge and Air Medal.
_______ _ x _______ ___
CHAIRPERSON
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20100022763
3
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20100022763
2
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110002704
The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Purple Heart, Republic of Vietnam (RVN) Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation, and an additional Bronze Star Medal (BSM). Therefore, it would be appropriate to correct his DD Form 214 to show one award of the RVN Civil Actions Honor Medal First Class Unit Citation. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100013486
The applicant requests his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) for the period ending 9 March 1971 be corrected to show the following awards: * Bronze Star Medal * Army Commendation Medal * Combat Infantryman Badge * all Vietnam awards to which he is entitled 2. He states he was an infantryman assigned to an infantry unit in combat in Vietnam. There are no orders in the applicant's service personnel records awarding him the Army Commendation Medal...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060006283C070205
There are no orders in the applicant’s military service records that show he was awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge. The applicant's DD Form 214, issued at the time of his separation, shows in Item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) that he was awarded the Bronze Star Medal, Army Commendation Medal, National Defense Service Medal, Vietnam Service Medal, Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal, Expert Marksmanship Qualification...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070003146C071113
There are no orders in the applicant’s military service records which show that he was awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge. Although there are no orders or evidence of record that shows the applicant was awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge, the evidence of record shows that while serving in Vietnam during the period under review, the applicant was an infantryman performing infantry duties, assigned to an infantry company during such time as the unit was engaged in active ground combat,...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100021050
The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) for the period ending 22 April 1971 to show award of the Purple Heart and the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB). Records show he was wounded as a result of hostile action on a combat operation while assigned to C Company, 1st Battalion, 502nd Infantry while serving as an infantryman in an infantry MOS position. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140013584
The applicant provides his DD Form 214. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides for award of the VSM. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting from his DD Form 214 the VSM with one bronze service star; and b. adding the following to his DD Form 214: * CIB * ARCOM * PH * BSM * AM * VSM with three bronze service stars * RVN Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation * Expert Marksmanship...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090018436
Item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) on his DD Form 214 does not show he was awarded the Bronze Star Medal and the Purple Heart. Item 24 does show he was awarded the Army Commendation Medal with "V" device and is authorized the Vietnam Service Medal with two bronze service stars. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by amending item 24 of his...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080014096
Department of the Army General Orders 8, dated 1974, announced award of the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation for service in Vietnam to Headquarters, United States Army Vietnam and its subordinate units during the period 20 July 1965 to 28 March 1973. The applicant contends that his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show award of the Purple Heart, Air Medal, Bronze Star Medal, Army Commendation Medal, Combat Infantryman Badge, and marksmanship Qualification...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110010913
The applicant's DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows in: a. item 29 (Qualification in Arms) he qualified as * Marksman with the M-16 automatic rifle on 24 September 1970 * First Class [Sharpshooter] with the grenade on 25 September 1970 * Expert with the M-16 automatic rifle on 6 November 1970 * Sharpshooter with the M-60 machine gun on 10 November 1970 b. item 31 (Foreign Service) RVN from 12 January to on or about 15 December 1971; c. item 38 (Record of Assignments) duty...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110010991
There are no orders in his military personnel records jacket (MPRJ) awarding him the Combat Infantryman Badge. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the Combat Infantryman Badge is awarded to infantry officers and to enlisted and warrant officer persons who have an infantry MOS. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.