Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100022484
Original file (20100022484.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	

		BOARD DATE:	  13 April 2011

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20100022484 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his date of rank (DOR) for promotion to captain (CPT)/pay grade O-3 from 31 August 2010 to 22 April 2010.

2.  The applicant states, that the results of the December 2009 Chaplaincy Captain Promotion Board were signed by the Secretary of Defense on 22 April 2010, but his State National Guard Headquarters was not notified until 16 July 2010.  As a result he was promoted to Captain with a DOR of 31 August 2010.  He should have a DOR of 22 April 2010. 

3.  The applicant provides copies of an email from his State Officer Personnel Management Branch Chief and the National Guard Bureau (NGB) orders granting him Federal Recognition as a captain effective 31 August 2010. 

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant, a Hawaii Army National Guard (HIARNG) officer, was selected for promotion by the December 2009 Chaplaincy Captain (CPT) Promotion Board.

2.  He was promoted to CPT effective 31 August 2010.

3.  During the processing of this case, an undated advisory opinion was obtained from the Chief, Personnel Policy Division, NGB.  The advisory official recommended adjusting the applicant's DOR to 22 April 2010.  The advisory official stated that the applicant was boarded by the December 2009 Chaplaincy First Lieutenant to Captain Promotion Board.  The State was told they would be notified upon receiving the results of the board however, there was a delay in getting the information to the State.  Although the results were available on
22 April 2010, the State did not receive notification until 16 July 2010. 

4.  The advisory official further states that the evidence indicates the applicant was eligible and should have been promoted to CPT with an effective date of
22 April 2010.

5.  On 1 October 2010, a copy of the advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for information and to allow him the opportunity to submit comments or a rebuttal.  No response was received.

6.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 14038, paragraph (f), states the effective date of a promotion of a Reserve commissioned officer of the Army who is extended Federal recognition in the next higher grade in the Army National Guard under section 307 or 310 of Title 32 shall be the date on which such Federal recognition in that grade is so extended.  

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends that his records should be corrected to show he was promoted to CPT effective and with a DOR of 22 April 2010.

2.  The evidence of record shows the applicant was found qualified for promotion and he was selected for promotion to CPT on 22 April 2010.

3.  The NGB recommends approval of his request.

4.  Therefore, in view of the foregoing and as a matter of equity, it would be appropriate to correct the applicant's records to show he was promoted to CPT effective and with a DOR of 22 April 2010.  Federal recognition should also be granted effective 22 April 2010.



BOARD VOTE:

____X____  ___X_____  ___X_____  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
	
1.  The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by:

   a.  showing he was promoted to the rank of CPT effective and with a DOR of 22 April 2010, and

	b.  granting Federal recognition in the rank of CPT effective and with a DOR of 22 April 2010.

2.  As a result of the above corrections, the Defense Finance and Accounting Service shall be notified of the Board's determination and to remit all back pay (i.e., pay and allowances, less any withholdings and/or deductions) that may be due as a result of the correction.



      _______ _   __X______   ___
       	   CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100013074



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100022484



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100012468

    Original file (20100012468.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    This official indicated the following: a. the applicant was fully qualified for promotion to CPT on the October 2008 board; b. the applicant’s promotion to CPT was not completed until 18 March 2010 due to administrative errors made during the processing of his promotion due to a mismatch in his assignment as a chaplain; c. during the NGB’s processing of the applicant’s Federal recognition on 17 February 2010, it was discovered that the applicant was erroneously assigned to a medical position...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140008410

    Original file (20140008410.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Personnel Management Officer (PMO) recommended approval of the applicant's request, stating: * he is not sure why the Army recruiter told the applicant it would be easier to get him in as a 1LT * it is not a question of ease, it is a question of law and legality * the applicant's initial appointment should have been as a CPT Chaplain in accordance with Army Regulation 135-100 (ARNG and USAR Appointment of Commission and Warrant Officers of the Army), Table 3-1 * the applicant's DD Form...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110012482

    Original file (20110012482.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    A memorandum, dated 29 November 2010, subject: Promotion as a Reserve Commissioned Officer of the Army, shows he was promoted to CPT effective 29 November 2010. c. The advisory official confirms he met the MTIG, and the civilian and military education requirements, and he was assigned to a CPT position as shown by Orders 026-853, dated 26 January 2009. d. The advisory official recommends approval of the applicant's request and correction of NGB SO Number 266 AR to show his promotion...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100024507

    Original file (20100024507.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 13 April 2011 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20100024507 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The orders stated the effective date (pay) of promotion would be the date NGB extended Federal recognition of the State promotion. The regulation states ARNG officers will be considered for promotion by mandatory promotion boards, and promotion to CPT required completion of 4 years of maximum time in grade as a 1LT.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120008644

    Original file (20120008644.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    In or around April 2009, his promotion packet went before a Federal Recognition Board (FRB) and shortly thereafter he was recommended for promotion by the Chief of Chaplains. The applicant provides: * Memorandum from the Chief of Chaplains * Orders 155-63 (State promotion to CPT) * Appointment memorandum * Email * NGB Special Orders Number 62 AR CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. As a result, the Board recommends that State Army National Guard records and all Department of the Army records of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120021008

    Original file (20120021008.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states he could not submit his promotion packet for CPT until the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) had finalized his DOR to first lieutenant (1LT). Without question, the failure to timely process the applicant's earlier correction for Federal recognition resulted in a delay in the processing of his appointment as a CPT. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army and State ARNG records of the individual concerned be corrected by...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100016083

    Original file (20100016083.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Since she had 14 years of service and only needed 2 years of time in grade (TIG), she should have been promoted to CPT by the April 2009 Federal Recognition Board (FRB). National Guard Regulation 600-100 (Commissioned Officer – Federal Recognition and Related Personnel Actions) provides procedures for processing all applications for Federal recognition. Had the applicant's initial Federal recognition date been timely, she would have been promoted to CPT effective 25 March 2009.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110004162

    Original file (20110004162.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides copies of: * Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) Record of Proceedings Docket Number AR20090007322, dated 5 January 2010 * his promotion orders to MAJ * National Guard Bureau (NGB) Federal recognition orders * two memoranda from the Virgin Islands National Guard (VING) Joint Force Headquarters * an NGB Form 89 (Proceedings of a Federal Recognition Examining Board) * his OER's * a memorandum of promotion to LTC by an SSB, dated 2 July 2009 * an NGB...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110015922

    Original file (20110015922.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 9 August 2012 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20110015922 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). He further indicates once the applicant was placed in a CPT position and the necessary corrections were made to his promotion packet, it was submitted to the NGB for Federal recognition processing in January 2010, and followed normal processing timelines which resulted in the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110002232

    Original file (20110002232.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states: * He was considered by a Federal Recognition Board (FRB) for direct appointment as a first lieutenant (1LT) in the Utah Army National Guard (UTARNG) on 8 October 2008 * His appointment packet was forwarded to the National Guard Bureau (NGB) on 14 October 2008 * Federal recognition for initial appointment normally takes 4 to 6 months * His packet was dropped off the system during a system upgrade * His packet was re-uploaded into the system in January 2009, and took...