IN THE CASE OF:
BOARD DATE: 13 April 2011
DOCKET NUMBER: AR20100022233
THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:
1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).
2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests his discharge characterized as under other than honorable conditions be changed to a medical discharge.
2. He states, in effect, he needs his discharge upgraded to qualify for Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) medical benefits.
3. He provides no additional evidence in support of his application.
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file. In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.
2. The applicant's record shows he enlisted in the Regular Army on 13 November 1979.
3. On 3 April 1981, charges were preferred against him for being absent without leave (AWOL) from 29 April 1980 to 5 May 1980 and from 7 May 1980 to 25 March 1981.
4. On 26 March 1981, he signed a disposition form stating that he did "not request a physical examination." He signed this form indicating he understood that if he wished to undergo a medical examination prior to his discharge he must submit a request to the commander of the medical treatment facility. He said he was aware that the purpose of the examination was to insure his medical records reflected, as accurately as possible, his state of health upon separation and to protect his interests and those of the government.
5. On 3 April 1981, he underwent a mental status evaluation that found him to be fully oriented and alert. His behavior and thought content were listed as normal. His thinking process was clear and his memory was good. The medical personnel noted no significant mental illness and found that he was mentally responsible and had the mental capacity to understand and participate in board proceedings.
6. On 7 April 1981, he consulted with counsel and requested discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial under the provisions of chapter 10 of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations Enlisted Personnel).
7. On the same date, he signed a request for discharge. He indicated that he was making the request under his own free will and that he was afforded the opportunity to speak with counsel. He acknowledged he understood that he may be furnished a discharge under other than honorable conditions, that he may be deprived of many or all Army benefits, that he may be ineligible for many or all VA benefits, and that he may expect to encounter substantial prejudice in civilian life because of a discharge under other than honorable conditions. He elected not to submit a statement in his behalf.
8. On an unspecified date, the appropriate authority approved his request for discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial.
9. His DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) shows he was discharged with a characterization of service listed as under other than honorable conditions on 10 July 1981. He completed 9 months and 1 day of creditable service with 323 days of lost time due to being AWOL.
10. There is no indication that he applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for an upgrade of his discharge within that board's 15-year statute of limitations.
11. Army Regulation 635-40 (Physical Evaluation for Retention, Retirement, or Separation) states that disability compensation is not an entitlement acquired by reason of service-incurred illness or injury; rather, it is provided to Soldiers whose service interrupted and they can no longer continue to reasonably perform because of a physical disability incurred or aggravated in service. When a Soldier is being processed for separation for reasons other than physical disability, continued performance of assigned duty commensurate with his or her rank or grade until the Soldier is scheduled for separation is an indication the individual is fit.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. There is no evidence and the applicant has not provided any which shows he was physically unfit to perform his duties at the time of separation. He declined a physical examination at the time of his separation and his mental evaluation, conducted on 3 April 1981 by a competent medical authority, determined he was mentally qualified for separation.
2. Additionally, there are no provisions in Army regulations that allow changing a discharge for the sole purpose of securing veterans' benefits. He must provide evidence to prove the discharge was rendered unjustly, in error, or that there were mitigating circumstances which warrant the change.
3. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting his request.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT FULL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
____X____ ___X_____ _____X___ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice. Therefore, the Board determined the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.
____________X_____________
CHAIRPERSON
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20100022233
3
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20100022233
2
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060003680C070205
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 28 NOVEMBER 2006 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20060003680 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant requested a discharge for the good of the service. The applicant’s mental evaluation, conducted by competent medical authority, determined that the applicant was then mentally fit for retention or...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090007047
On 31 October 1981, the applicant's commander notified him that he was initiating action to discharge him under the provisions of chapter 14 of Army Regulation 635-200 for misconduct due to his apathetic attitude, lack of discipline, possession of drugs, and frequent run-ins with authorities. The applicant's service medical records were reviewed. Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7b, provides that a general discharge is a separation from the Army under honorable conditions.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080011901
IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 16 December 2008 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20080011901 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). However, the evidence of record provides no evidence to suggest the applicant was suffering from a disabling mental or medical condition at the time of discharge that would have supported his separation processing through medical channels.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130014220
c. He acknowledged he understood that if his request for discharge was accepted he could be discharged under conditions other than honorable. b. Paragraph 3-7b states a general discharge is a separation from the Army under honorable conditions. ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20130014220 3 ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 1 ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20130014220 2 ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 1
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120008798
On 16 November 1981, the applicant also underwent a medical examination for the purpose of discharge under chapter 10, Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations): a. With respect to the applicant's request for a medical discharge, his record is void of any evidence and he has not provided any evidence that shows he suffered an illness and/or a disease that was severe enough to render him physically unable to perform the duties required of his grade and military specialty. The Army...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110018647
You're not an NCO"; b. first sergeant (1SG) FB, upon hearing this altercation, gave the applicant a lawful order to sit down. On 25 May 1982, the separation authority approved his request for discharge under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial, with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. 11. his DD Form 214 confirms he was discharged on 1 June 1982 in accordance with Army Regulation 635-200,...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140003973
The applicant requests reconsideration of his previous request for correction of his records to show he was honorably discharged for medical reasons. His military records contain no evidence that he suffered from a mental disorder or medical condition that would have warranted his separation for disability. He claims his basic training experience involving the gas chamber affected his behavior and caused him to run away from the Army.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140018231
The applicant states: * he was found unfit to perform and continue his military service because of physical disability due to three hernia injuries * his multiple injuries interfered with his ability to perform his job requirements * the derogatory narrative reason for separation and codes on his DD Form 214 misconstrues the real reason for his separation * he was instead chaptered out for motivational problems and/or a defective attitude when the real reason should have been his chronic...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110018679
f. He feels his discharge should be upgraded because he served honorably and his sickness was due to a lack of treatment for depression. The applicant's military record shows he enlisted in the Regular Army on 13 January 1976 for 3 years. On 1 September 1982, the applicant's company commander notified the applicant of his intent to initiate action to effect his discharge for unsuitability because of apathy pursuant to the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations ...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080007811
c. His service medical records show he exhibited schizoid features in 1981, but he received no treatment. The applicant provides: a. He provides evidence dating from January 1981 which shows he was referred for a psychiatric consultation due to anxiety and sleeplessness.