IN THE CASE OF:
BOARD DATE: 8 March 2011
DOCKET NUMBER: AR20100022188
THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:
1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).
2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Purple Heart.
2. The applicant states the Purple Heart was not entered on his DD Form 214.
3. The applicant provides his DD Form 214.
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file. In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.
2. The applicant's military records show he was inducted into the Army of the United States on 4 March 1968. He completed initial entry training, was awarded military occupational specialty 44B (metal body repairman), and was promoted to pay grade E-4.
3. His DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows he served in the Republic of Vietnam performing duties as a metal body repairman and welder.
4. He was honorably released from active duty on 25 January 1970 and transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve Control Group (Annual Training). He completed 1 year, 10 months, and 22 days of creditable active service.
5. Item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations, and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of his DD Form 214 does not show award of the Purple Heart.
6. Item 40 (Wounds) of the applicant's DA Form 20 is blank.
7. His name does not appear on the Vietnam casualty roster.
8. His records do not contain any evidence that indicates he was ever awarded the Purple Heart by proper authority.
9. A review of the Awards and Decorations Computer-Assisted Retrieval System, an index of general orders issued during the Vietnam era between 1965 and 1973 maintained by the Military Awards Branch of the U.S. Army Human Resources Command, failed to reveal any orders for award of the Purple Heart pertaining to the applicant.
10. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of hostile action. Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have required treatment by medical personnel, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. The applicant's DA Form 20 does not show he was wounded and his name is not listed on the Vietnam casualty roster.
2. In the absence of evidence he was wounded or injured as a result of hostile action, treated for such wounds, and that it was made a matter of official record, there is insufficient evidence upon which to base award of the Purple Heart. As a result, the regulatory burden of proof necessary to support award of the Purple Heart has not been satisfied in this case. Therefore, there is insufficient basis for granting the applicant's requested relief.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT FULL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
___X____ __X____ ___X____ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice. Therefore, the Board determined the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.
_______ _ X_______ ___
CHAIRPERSON
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20100022188
3
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20100022188
3
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140014187
The applicant requests correction of his records to show award of the Purple Heart. A review of the applicant's military personnel records failed to reveal any orders or other evidence that shows he was awarded the Purple Heart. In order to support awarding a member the Purple Heart, substantiating evidence must be provided to verify that the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have required treatment by medical personnel, and the medical treatment must have been made a...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080016751
Therefore, there is sufficient evidence to show that he is entitled to award of the Purple Heart and correction of his records to show this award. Evidence of record shows the applicant was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding the applicant the Purple Heart for wounds received in action on 16 July 1971 in the Republic of Vietnam; and b. adding award of the Purple...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090000009
The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Purple Heart. There is no evidence in the available records which shows that the applicant was awarded the Purple Heart or was wounded as a result of hostile action in Vietnam. In the absence of orders or other evidence of record showing that the applicant was injured or treated for wounds as a result of hostile action in Vietnam, the radiology report provided by the applicant is not...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004100635C070208
The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. As a result, the application date for this case is 29 December 2003, which is within the statute of limitations for the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR). The applicant's service personnel records contain two DD Forms 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) for the periods 16 September 1964 to 12 December 1965 and 13 December 1965 to...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090003999
The applicant requests award of the Purple Heart for wounds received in the Republic of Vietnam. Item 41 (Awards and Decorations) of this same form shows the same awards as listed on his DD Form 214. The medical evidence provided by the applicant is inconclusive in that it does not contain any evidence pertaining to the circumstances surrounding the applicant's reported shrapnel wounds.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100019403
This extract recounts the attack and lists the number of casualties, but makes no mention of the applicant by name. They each recall the attack that occurred on 3 December 1967. a. Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have been treated by medical personnel, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official records.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130013613
The applicant requests correction of his records to show award of the Purple Heart. A review of the applicant's military personnel records failed to reveal any orders or other evidence that shows he was awarded the Purple Heart. The applicant contends that his records should be corrected to show award of the Purple Heart because he was injured by shrapnel while serving in the Republic of Vietnam.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120011571
There is no evidence in the available records which shows the applicant was awarded the Purple Heart or was wounded as a result of hostile action in Vietnam. However, the eyewitness statement from the medic provided by the applicant indicates the medic treated the applicant during the period 9-15 July 1966. In the absence of corroborating evidence showing he was injured as a result of hostile action in Vietnam, the eyewitness statement provided by the applicant is not sufficient as a basis...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080006932
The applicant provides: a. The applicant's records contain no evidence upon which an award of the Purple Heart may be made. In order to award a Purple Heart, evidence must show that a wound occurred and was the result of hostile action; that the wound required medical treatment; and that the medical treatment was made a matter of official record.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090021210
There are no orders for the Purple Heart in the applicants service personnel records. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: There is no evidence of record which shows that the applicant was wounded as a result of hostile action in Vietnam. In the absence of orders or other evidence of record showing that the applicant was injured or treated for wounds as a result of hostile action in Vietnam, the radiology reports provided by the applicant are not sufficient as a basis for award of the Purple Heart.