Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100022053
Original file (20100022053.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  24 February 2011

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20100022053 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Bronze Star Medal (BSM).

2.  The applicant states that he deserves to have the BSM reflected on his DD Form 214 just like all of the other members of his unit.

3.  The applicant provides a document titled “Awards and Decorations Earned During 1971.”

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant's record shows he was inducted into the Army of the United States on 7 April 1970.  He was trained in and awarded military occupational specialty (MOS) 11B (Light Weapons Infantryman).

3.  The applicant's DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows he served in Vietnam from 2 September 1970 through 3 September 1971.  Item 38 (Record of Assignments) shows he was assigned to 1st Battalion, 501st Infantry Regiment and he performed the duties of a rifleman during his RVN tour.  Item 41 (Awards and Decorations) does not include the BSM.

4.  The applicant's Official Military Personnel File (OMPF) is void of any orders or documents that indicate he was ever recommended for or awarded the BSM while serving in Vietnam or at any other time during his military service.

5.  On 6 December 1971, the applicant was honorably released from active duty in the rank/grade of sergeant (SGT)/E-5 after completing 1 year and 8 months of total active service.  Item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of his DD Form 214 does not include the BSM among the awards listed.

6.  The applicant provides a document titled “Awards and Decorations Earned During 1971.”  This document includes a by-name list of individuals that show their rank and indicate their entitlement to the Silver Star or BSM with "V" Device for Valor.  The applicant’s name is included among this list; however, this document does not include any verifiable information such as a social security number or service number to confirm the exact identity of the individuals listed thereon.  This document also does not show the general orders number or issuing authority for the specified awards.

7.  Review of the Awards and Decorations Computer-Assisted Retrieval System (ADCARS), an index of general orders issued during the Vietnam era between 1965 and 1973 maintained by the Military Awards Branch of the United States Army Human Resources Command, failed to reveal any orders for the BSM pertaining to the applicant.

8.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) contains the Army's awards policy.  Paragraph 3-14 contains guidance on award of the BSM and states, in pertinent part, that it is awarded for heroic acts, or meritorious achievement or service, of a lesser degree than required for the Silver Star.  As with all personal decorations, formal recommendations, approval through the chain of command, and announcement in orders are required.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  There are no available general orders showing that the applicant was awarded the BSM by the appropriate award authority.  The evidence he provides, absent any official document to substantiate his claim that he was awarded the BSM while on active duty, is insufficient to grant the requested relief.

2.  Should the applicant have, or be able to obtain, a copy of the orders awarding him the BSM or be able to provide other evidence to corroborate his claim to the BSM, he may submit a request for reconsideration to this Board.

3.  In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X____  ____X____  ____X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      ___________X___________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100022053



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100022053



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110002645

    Original file (20110002645.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    This form shows his recommendation for award of the Silver Star was downgraded to a BSM with "V" Device. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: The evidence of record confirms the applicant was awarded two awards of the BSM during his active duty tenure; however, a recommendation for award of the Silver Star for heroism was still pending at the time of his discharge. Therefore, it would be appropriate at this time to correct his DD Form 214 to show the BSM (3rd Award) and with "V" Device, which...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110018262

    Original file (20110018262.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Bronze Star Medal (BSM) and the Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM) with "V" Device. The Korea Defense Service Medal is authorized for award to members of the Armed Forces of the United States who have served on active duty in support of the defense of the Republic of Korea. Deleting from his DD Form 214 the Army Commendation Medal and the Vietnam...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120012337

    Original file (20120012337.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the following: * Purple Heart * two Bronze Star Medals (BSM) * Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM) * Army Good Conduct Medal * two Certificates of Appreciation 2. Headquarters, Americal Division, General Orders Number 3875, dated 21 May 1969, with BSM Certificate,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110002704

    Original file (20110002704.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Purple Heart, Republic of Vietnam (RVN) Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation, and an additional Bronze Star Medal (BSM). Therefore, it would be appropriate to correct his DD Form 214 to show one award of the RVN Civil Actions Honor Medal First Class Unit Citation. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130005774

    Original file (20130005774.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The citation for his BSM with ”V” Device clearly indicates that he was wounded as a result of enemy action on 15 March 1971. The applicant served in six campaigns in Vietnam and thus is entitled to wear one silver and one bronze service star on his already-awarded Vietnam Service Medal and to have them entered on his DD Form 214. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: * awarding him the Purple Heart for wounds...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120011636

    Original file (20120011636.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 24 January 2013 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20120011636 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The evidence of record shows he was awarded the BSM as follows: a. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting from his DD Form 214 the: * Bronze Star Medal (1st Oak Leaf Cluster) * Vietnam Service Medal b. adding to his DD Form 214 the: * Bronze Star Medal (3d Award) * Vietnam Service...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140014338

    Original file (20140014338.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) for the period ending 22 September 1972 to show: * his date of birth (DOB) as 8 September 1947 * award of the Bronze Star Medal (BSM) and Air Medal * his date of entry as 12 or 13 December 1966 2. The applicant states: * his DOB should be 8 September 1947 instead of 8 September 1945 * his DD Form 214 for the period ending 22 September 1972 does not show the BSM or Air...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120008357

    Original file (20120008357.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The following general orders (GO) published by Headquarters, 9th Infantry Division awarded the applicant the following awards as indicated: * GO Number 7566, dated 26 August 1968, awarded him the BSM with "V" Device for heroism in Vietnam on 24 June 1968 * GO Number 8191, dated 9 September 1968, awarded him BSM with "V" Device for heroism in Vietnam on 12 and 13 August 1968 * GO Number 2550, dated 5 March 1969, awarded him the BSM (2nd OLC) for meritorious service in Vietnam for the period...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130005828

    Original file (20130005828.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    During its original review of the case, the Board determined the applicant's record was void of any documents or orders indicating he was ever recommended for or awarded the BSM by proper authority during his active duty tenure. It further determined that absent any evidence or record corroborating the information contained in the MG's letter provided by the applicant or showing he was ever awarded the BSM with "V" Device, there was an insufficient evidentiary basis to support granting his...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050018133C070206

    Original file (20050018133C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    He also requests that his records be corrected to show he was given a battlefield commission. A VA Rating Decision dated 5 November 2005 indicated that the applicant’s service medical records from 5 September 1969 through 12 August 1971 were available. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. amending his DD Form 214 to show the Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with rifle bar (M-16) in lieu of the...