Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100021890
Original file (20100021890.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  7 April 2011

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20100021890 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his military records to show his first name as "Ramon."

2.  He states, in effect, he was not asked to provide a birth certificate at the time of his enlistment and he was allowed to enlist based upon a letter of recommendation from a doctor who confirmed his abilities as an electrocardiograph (EKG) technician.  He states he enlisted using the first name "James."  He concludes that he needs his military records corrected because his spouse's bipolar disorder and speech impediment make it difficult for her to complete paperwork in the event something were to happen to him.

3.  The applicant provides:

* a Petition for Change of Name
* a letter from an attorney
* his birth certificate
* a DD Form 4 (Enlistment Contract - Armed Forces of the United States)
* a DA Form 428 (Application for Identification Card)

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error 

or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant's record shows he enlisted in the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) on 17 March 1976 and he served through a series of reenlistments.  He was honorably retired on 21 March 1994 by reason of attaining maximum age.

3.  A thorough review of every document contained in his available military personnel and medical records, many of which bear his signature, shows that his first name consistently appears as "James."

4.  He provides a copy of his Certification of Birth issued by the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico Department of Health on 25 October 1990 which shows his first name as "Ramon."

5.  He provides a copy of a Petition for Change of Name he filed with the Civil Court of the City of New York, County of Kings, on 28 March 2000.  This petition shows he stated his name is "Ramon A---- V---- (a/k/a [also known as]
James A----) and requested to assume the name "Ramon A----."  He further stated the grounds of this application were as follows:

* while he was growing up he was called "James" and he became known as "James A----"
* his official documents were under the name "James"
* he now wishes to use the name given to him at birth, "Ramon"
* some agencies have accepted his name as "Ramon A----" while others have not

6.  He provides a letter rendered by a staff attorney for Legal Services Plan, Teamsters Local 234 Welfare Fund, New York, NY, dated 8 December 2000.  This letter indicates his petition to change his name was approved and a certified order was issued to officially change his name to "Ramon A----."  He was advised to take the order to Vital Records to have his birth certificate changed accordingly.


DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's contention that his military records should be corrected to change his first name from "James" to "Ramon" was carefully considered and determined to lack merit.

2.  The evidence of record shows his first name consistently appeared as "James" on every document in his available service personnel and medical records throughout his period of military service.  He authenticated several of these documents requiring his signature by placing his signature in the appropriate blocks as "James A----."

3.  By his own admission, he grew up using the first name of "James" and all of his official documents showed his name as "James" until March 2000, when he decided he wanted to begin going by the name given to him at birth.

4.  For historical purposes, the Army has an interest in maintaining the accuracy of its records.  The data and information contained in those records should reflect the conditions and circumstances that existed at the time the records were created.  In the absence of a showing of material error or injustice, there is a reluctance to recommend that those records be changed.  While it is understandable the applicant desires to now record his correct name in his military records, there is not a sufficiently compelling reason for compromising the integrity of the Army’s records at this late date.

5.  The applicant is advised that a copy of this decisional document along with his application and the supporting evidence he provided, which confirms his correct name, will be filed in his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF).  This should serve to clarify any questions or confusion in regard to the difference in the name recorded in his military record and to satisfy his desire to have his correct name documented in his OMPF.

6.  The applicant and all others should know that this action in no way diminishes the sacrifices made by the applicant in service to our Nation.  The applicant and all Americans should be justifiably proud of his service in arms.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X____  ____X___  ____X___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      ___________X____________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100021890



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100021890



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040006156C070208

    Original file (20040006156C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 17 May 2005 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20040006156 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant requests, in effect, that the first and middle names recorded in Item 1 (Last Name, First Name, Middle Name) of his separation document (DD Form 214) be corrected to read Ramon Miguel, instead of Miguel...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110018976

    Original file (20110018976.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides: * his WD AGO Form 53-55 (Enlisted Record and Report of Separation – Honorable Discharge) for the period ending 14 December 1946 * his WD AGO Form 53 (Enlisted Record and Report of Separation – Honorable Discharge) for the period ending 14 December 1949 * his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) for the period ending 1 March 1960 * his DD Form 214 for the period ending 31 August 1965 * a letter to him from the Army Review...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080006742

    Original file (20080006742.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). There is no evidence in the applicant's service personnel records to show he applied for a legal name change, of his first name, while he served on active duty. _______ _ x _______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080005995

    Original file (20080005995.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He now requests his military records corrected. Counsel requests correction of the applicant’s military records to show his correct name, date of birth, and place of birth. The applicant requests that his DD Form 214, dated 24 November 1969, be corrected to show his correct name as “Roxxxxo Rxxxxa-Vxxa,” his DOB as “29 July 1947,” and place of birth as “Arecibo, Puerto Rico.” 2.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120012425

    Original file (20120012425.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    However, his first and middle names were transposed and his military records show his name as "James William W_____." This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. Considering all the evidence and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | AR20140009914

    Original file (AR20140009914.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states his DD Form 214 shows his middle name as James when, in fact, it is Jules. His DD Form 214 for this period of active duty shows his middle name as James. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by deleting from his DD Form 214 the middle name entry of James and replacing it with the middle name entry as Jules, as shown on his Certification of Birth.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130001462

    Original file (20130001462.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's DD Form 1966 (Application for Enlistment - Armed Forces of the United States), completed by the applicant on 13 September 1983, shows in: a. section I (Personal Data), block 2 (Name - Last, First, Middle Name), his first name as "James"; b. section X (Statement of Name for Official Military Records), item 48, shows, "If the preferred enlistment name (name given in block 2) is not the same as on your birth certificate, and it has not been changed by legal procedure prescribed...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110013851

    Original file (20110013851.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Public Law 99-661, dated 14 November 1986, permitted divorce courts to order SBP coverage (without the member's agreement) in those cases where the retiree had elected spouse coverage at retirement or was still on active duty and had not yet made an SBP election. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1450(f)(3)(A), permits a former spouse to make a written request that an SBP election of former spouse coverage be deemed to have been made when the former spouse is awarded the SBP annuity incident to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090006375

    Original file (20090006375.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    A Spouse SBP Election Concurrence Statement, dated 19 February 2008, shows the applicant's spouse concurred with his election not to participate in SBP. Evidence of record shows the applicant elected not to participate in spousal SBP coverage on 13 December 2007. The Spouse SBP Election Concurrence Statement, dated 19 February 2008, that the applicant provided that shows his spouse concurred with his election not to participate in SBP contains no official seal and it is not sufficient for...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130016226

    Original file (20130016226.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He was ordered to provide proof of his marriage and annulment to Ms. Renee Rxxxxxxxxx. A GOMOR, regardless of issuing authority, may be filed in the AMHRR only upon the order of a general officer. Once the GOMOR was filed in his AMHRR, it became a permanent record and will not be removed from or moved to another part of the AMHRR unless directed by certain agencies, to include this Board.