Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100021616
Original file (20100021616.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:

		BOARD DATE:	  29 March 2011

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20100021616 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of her uncharacterized discharge to an honorable discharge.

2.  The applicant states she did not have a personality disorder before she enlisted in the Army.

3.  The applicant provides a copy of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty).

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant's record shows she enlisted in the Regular Army on 14 October 1988.  The highest rank/grade she attained while serving on active duty was private/E-1.

3.  On 3 November 1988, she underwent a mental status evaluation.  The examining psychiatrist diagnosed her with a personality disorder not otherwise specified with borderline and histrionic features.  Her suicide gesture potential was considered to be high.  He recommended administrative separation in accordance with paragraph 5-13, Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations – Enlisted Personnel), based on her personality disorder.  He stated her personality disorder was:

* a lifelong and deeply-ingrained maladaptive pattern of behavior
* considered chronic and recalcitrant to attempts at rehabilitation
* not compatible with satisfactory military service
* highly likely to prevent her from completing initial training

4.  On 3 November 1988, her immediate commander notified her of his intent to initiate separation action against her under the provisions of paragraph 5-13 of Army Regulation 635-200 by reason of a personality disorder.  Her commander remarked the applicant's personality disorder was not compatible with military service.  He recommended that she receive an entry-level separation.

5.  On the same day, she acknowledged receipt of her notification of her pending separation action and she was advised of the basis for the contemplated action to separate her for a personality disorder under the provisions of paragraph 5-13 of Army Regulation 635-200.  She waived consulting counsel and elected not to submit a statement.

6.  The separation authority approved her separation under the provisions of paragraph 5-13, Army Regulation 635-200, due to a personality disorder and directed that she receive an entry-level separation (uncharacterized).  On 17 November 1988, she was discharged accordingly.  She completed 1 month and 4 days of total active service.

7.  There is no indication the applicant applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for a change to her discharge.

8.  Army Regulation 635-200 provides the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.  Paragraph 5-13 provides that a Soldier may be separated for personality disorder not amounting to disability which interferes with assignment to or performance of duty.  The regulation requires that the condition is a deeply-ingrained maladaptive pattern of behavior of long duration that interferes with the Soldier's ability to perform duty.  It further specifies that the service of Soldiers separated under this provision will be characterized as honorable unless in an entry-level status, in which case it will be uncharacterized.  Chapter 3 states a separation will be described as entry level with uncharacterized service if the Soldier has less than 180 days of continuous active duty service at the time the separation action is initiated.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant requests correction of her uncharacterized discharge to an honorable discharge.

2.  By regulation, members may be separated under the provisions of paragraph 5-13, Army Regulation 635-200, if they suffer from a personality disorder not amounting to disability which interferes with assignment to or performance of duty.  The regulation requires that the condition is a deeply-ingrained maladaptive pattern of behavior of long duration that interferes with the Soldiers ability to perform duty.

3.  The applicant contends she did not have a personality disorder prior to entering the Army; however, she has not provided evidence to support her contention.  The record confirms she was diagnosed with a personality disorder by competent medical authority.  Based on this diagnosis, her separation processing was accomplished in accordance with the applicable regulation.  All requirements of law and regulation were met and the rights of the applicant were fully protected throughout the separation process.

4.  In view of the foregoing, her request should be denied.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X____  ____X___  ___X____  DENY APPLICATION


BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      ____________X_____________
                 CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100021616



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100021616



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070008154

    Original file (20070008154.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant finally states, in effect, that she really didn’t pay attention to what was put on her separation papers (DD Form 214), as long as it said honorable and when she could be discharged. The separation authority approved the applicant’s separation under the provisions of paragraph 5-13, Army Regulation 635-200 due to a personality disorder, and directed that the applicant receive an honorable discharge. The DD Form 214 issued to the applicant upon her separation confirms, in Item...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070019019

    Original file (AR20070019019.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? The unit commander subsequently recommended separation from the service under the provisions of AR 635-200, Chapter 5, paragraph 5-13, by reason of a personality disorder, with service uncharacterized. Army Regulation 635-200 provides, except in cases of serious misconduct, that a Soldier’s service will be uncharacterized when her separation is initiated while the Soldier is in entry-level status.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090007814

    Original file (20090007814.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    She was advised of the basis of her contemplated separation due to personality disorder under the provisions of paragraph 5-13 of Army Regulation 635-200 and its effects, of the rights available to her, and the effects of any action taken by her in waiving her rights. The DD Form 214 she was issued shows she was honorably discharged in accordance with paragraph 5-13 of Army Regulation 635-200 by reason of personality disorder. This form further shows she completed 1 year and 21 days of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130019500

    Original file (20130019500.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. His record is void of any medical evidence of rape or any reported incident of rape. As a result, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request for an honorable discharge.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090011225

    Original file (20090011225 .txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states, in effect, that the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) granted her a 30-percent service-connected disability rating and her DD Form 214 should reflect this information. The DD Form 214 issued to the applicant on the date of her separation shows she was separated under the provisions of paragraph 5-13, Army Regulation 635-200, by reason of personality disorder. By regulation, members may be separated under the provisions of paragraph 5-13, Army Regulation 635-200, if...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090016413

    Original file (20090016413.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He further stated that it was unlikely that any rehabilitative measures would make the applicant an effective Soldier and he recommended the applicant's prompt administrative separation in accordance with paragraph 5-13, Army Regulation 635-200 (Active Duty Enlisted Administrative Separations), based on her personality disorder. The DD Form 214 issued to the applicant upon her separation confirms she was honorably separated on 15 June 2005 in the rank of PFC/E-3 under the provisions of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120001021

    Original file (20120001021.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The regulation shows that the SPD code “JFX” as shown on the applicant’s DD Form 214 specifies the narrative reason for separation as involuntary discharge for “Personality Disorder” and that the authority for separation under this separation program designator is “AR 635-200, Paragraph 5-13.” Additionally, the SPD/RE Code Cross Reference Table, Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) establishes RE code 3 as the proper reentry code to assign to Soldiers separated for this reason. Her...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100014817

    Original file (20100014817.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Discharge proceedings under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations), paragraph 5-13, for a personality disorder were initiated on 7 September 1983. Entry level status is defined as the first 180 days of continuous active duty. It merely means that the Soldier has not been in the Army long enough for his or her character of service to be rated as honorable or otherwise.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120002365

    Original file (20120002365.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states when she was discharged from the Army, she had a permanent medical profile for her ankles. The examining psychologist diagnosed her with a "personality disorder, not otherwise specified" and stated she did not have a psychiatric condition that warranted disposition through medical channels, met the retention requirements of Army Regulation 40-501 (Standards of Medical Fitness), and did not require a medical board. There is no evidence in her available record and she...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110008121

    Original file (20110008121.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 10 October 2006, the applicant was counseled and was told she was being considered for administrative separation under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Enlisted Separations), chapter 5-13 (personality disorder), not amounting to disability. She was also told the following: * she was rehabilitatively transferred to the 2nd Platoon, 977th MP Company on 15 August 2006 * she was counseled on 26 August 2006 for taking her duty pistol into her barracks room * she was counseled on 7...