Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100020948
Original file (20100020948.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  16 February 2011

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20100020948 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests award of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB).

2.  The applicant states he was an infantryman assigned to an infantry unit and participated in active ground combat in Vietnam.

3.  The applicant provides copies of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) and DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record).

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant was inducted into the Army of the United States on 22 August 1967.  He completed initial entry training and was awarded military occupational specialty (MOS) 11B (Light Weapons Infantryman).

3.  Item 31 (Foreign Service) of his DA Form 20 shows he served in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN) from 9 February 1968 to 6 February 1969 and item 38 (Record of Assignments) shows he was assigned to infantry units while in the RVN.  The CIB is not included in the list of awards contained in item 41 (Awards and Decorations) of his DA Form 20.

4.  His official military personnel file (OMPF) is void of orders or any other document that indicates he was recommended for or awarded the CIB.

5.  On 21 August 1969, he was honorably released from active duty by reason of expiration of his term of service.  Item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of his DD Form 214 does not show the CIB.

6.  A review of the Awards and Decorations Computer-Assisted Retrieval System, an index of general orders issued during the Vietnam era between 1965 and 1973 maintained by the Military Awards Branch of the U.S. Army Human Resources Command, failed to reveal any orders for the CIB pertaining to the applicant.

7.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the CIB is awarded to infantry officers and to enlisted and warrant officer persons who have an infantry MOS.  They must have served in active ground combat while assigned or attached to an infantry unit of brigade, regimental, or smaller size.  Additionally, appendix V of U.S. Army Vietnam Regulation 672-1 (Decorations and Awards) states that during the Vietnam era the CIB was awarded only to enlisted individuals who held and served in MOS 11B, 11C, 11D, 11F, 11G, or 11H.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's contention that he is entitled to award of the CIB has been carefully considered.

2.  The evidence shows he was awarded MOS 11B and served with infantry units while in the RVN.  However, it does not sufficiently show he ever engaged in active ground combat while assigned to these units.

3.  His OMPF is void of orders or any other documents that indicate he was recommended for or awarded the CIB.  There is simply insufficient evidence to corroborate his contention that he engaged in active ground combat while in the RVN.

4.  In view of the foregoing, the applicant's request should be denied.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ___X_____  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X_____  ____X____  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      __________XXX_______________
                 CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100020948



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100020948



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070012635C080407

    Original file (20070012635C080407.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Item 38 (Record of Assignments) of the applicant's DA Form 20 shows that during his RVN tour, he was assigned to Company C, 4th Engineer Battalion, performing duties in MOS 12B as a combat engineer. Item 41 (Awards and Decorations) does not include the CIB in the list of awards it contains. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070016540

    Original file (20070016540.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    There are no orders or other evidence in the applicant’s military service records that show he was awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge. The applicant contends, in effect, that his request for award of the Combat Infantryman Badge should be reconsidered because he held MOS 11B as his secondary MOS, served in duty MOS 11B, and also served in combat situations during his second tour in the RVN. There are no orders or other evidence to show the applicant was awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080008114

    Original file (20080008114.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states, in effect, that while serving in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN) he was assigned to a unit as an infantryman and performed the duties of an infantryman. There are no orders in his official record showing he was awarded the CIB. The evidence in the official record shows the applicant held MOS 94B and performed duties as a cook while in the RVN.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100029409

    Original file (20100029409.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows: a. item 22 (MOS) – his primary MOS (PMOS) as 62E2O, Construction Machine Operator, awarded 15 September 1967; b. item 27 (Military Education) – he completed the Construction Machine Operator and Full Track Operator courses in 1967; c. item 31 (Foreign Service) – he served in the RVN from 5 October 1967 to 18 December 1969; and d. Item 38 (Record of Assignments) – he was assigned to Company B, 815th Engineer Battalion (Construction), from...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090020331

    Original file (20090020331.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB). Additionally, Appendix V of U.S. Army Vietnam (USARV) Regulation 672-1 (Awards and Decorations) states that during the Vietnam era the Combat Infantryman Badge was awarded only to enlisted individuals who held and served in MOS...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120008275

    Original file (20120008275.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests award of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB). By regulation, in order to be awarded the CIB there must be evidence that an individual held and served in an infantry MOS.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080013483

    Original file (20080013483.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    By regulation, in order to qualify for the CIB, in addition to being an infantryman performing infantry duties, and being assigned to an infantry unit when the unit is engaged in active ground combat, the applicant must also show that he was actively participating in ground combat. The evidence in the applicant's official record shows he held MOS 11D and performed duties as a rifleman for his entire period of service in the RVN while assigned to an infantry unit. Given the above, and in...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100016811

    Original file (20100016811.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Company D, 1st Battalion, 12th Cavalry, 1st Cavalry Division was awarded the RVN Civil Actions Honor Medal First Class Unit Citation for the period 1 January 1969 to 1 February 1970, by Department of the Army General Orders 42 dated 1972; and b. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting from item 24 of his DD...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060014536

    Original file (20060014536.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 22 May 2007 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20060014536 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. x The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. In addition, the CIB is also not included in the list of awards contained in Item 41 of the applicant's DA Form...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120007790

    Original file (20120007790.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). However, there is no evidence of record that indicates he was ever recommended for or awarded the CIB during his active duty service. Notwithstanding his sincerity and the apparent issuance of the CIB (1st Award) to him by TACOM, in the absence of official documentary evidence that conclusively shows he was personally present with a qualifying infantry unit when it was engaged in active ground...