Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100020919
Original file (20100020919.txt) Auto-classification: Approved


		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  7 April 2011

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20100020919 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).

THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests her U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) status be changed from "Discharged" to "Retired Reserve."

2.  The applicant states, in effect:

	a.  she requested to be transferred to the Retired Reserve in lieu of discharge, but she was discharged instead and needs her status changed from "Y-Archived/Discharged to R-Retired Reserve";

	b.  an administrative error was confirmed by the U.S. Army Human Resources Command (HRC) in an email, dated 15 July 2010;

	c.  she discussed the issue with numerous HRC personnel to include her branch manager and she was informed that she must submit her request to this Board due to the amount of time that has passed;

	d.  she served her country for over 20 years and believes her retirement should not be penalized due to an administrative error; and

   e.  she was not aware of the error until recently.

3.  The applicant provides:

* a copy of her Notification of Eligibility for Retired Pay at Age 60 (20-year letter)
* five pages of email messages

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant's records show she was commissioned in the USAR on 9 June 1988.  She continued to serve in a variety of positions and was advanced through the commissioned officer ranks culminating in the rank of major.

3.  Her record contains a Request for Reserve Component Assignment or Attachment, dated 1 September 2005, which shows she submitted a request for voluntary retirement and also requested to be transferred to the Retired Reserve effective 1 October 2005.

4.  Her record contains a memorandum from the G-1, Headquarters, 5137th U.S. Army Corps (Reinforcement), St. Louis, MO, dated 1 September 2005, subject:  Transfer to Retired Reserve [Applicant], to the Commander, HRC, requesting that she be relieved from the attached unit and transferred to the Retired Reserve effective 1 October 2005.

5.  On 29 September 2005, HRC issued her a 20-year letter.  This letter informed her she had completed the required years of service and would be eligible for retired pay upon application at age 60.

6.  Orders D-04-608738 issued by HRC, dated 4 April 2006, show she was discharged from the USAR effective 4 April 2006.

7.  She submitted four pages of email traffic between herself and HRC, dated 3 May to 19 July 2010, which state:

	a.  she was told she was not transferred into the Retired Reserve due to a mix up in her record and her being issued mobilization orders after submitting her retirement request;

	b.  her request for transfer to the Retired Reserve was approved based on the fact she had her 20-year letter and had submitted her retirement papers prior to the issuance of the mobilization order;

	c.  the Officer Personnel Division Logistics Career Manager stated:

		(1)  she clearly should have been transferred to the Retired Reserve because she had 20 years of service, requested transfer to the Retired Reserve prior to mobilization orders being published; and

		(2)  had completed her mandatory service obligation, had not made an election to remain in the Individual Ready Reserve (IRR), and had been afforded the opportunity to resign or request transfer to the Retired Reserve even after mobilization orders were published.

	d.  The Delay and Exemption (D&E) Team Chief stated she had submitted two exemption cases and that:

		(1)  In accordance with Department of Defense Directive (DODD) 1235.13 (Management of IRR and Inactive Guard), she was past her mandatory service obligation, had not made an election to remain in the Individual Ready Reserve, and was afforded the opportunity to resign or request transfer to the Retired Reserve even after mobilization orders were published.

		(2)  "The first case says:  board recommend - exemption disapproved, board reason rule - administrative reasons, decision current organization  (CURRORG) code - Discharge (Y) - then Commander Decision Code - Exemption withdrawn."

		(3)  "The second case says:  board recommend - exemption approved, board reason rule – administrative reasons, decision CURORG - USAR Retired Reserves (R) -- then Commander Decision Code - Exemption approved."

		(4)  "Also, even though [D&E Team] don't have a copy of her case anymore the request memo that all Soldier's sign says, 'If I am eligible, I request transfer to the Retired Reserve in lieu of discharge'"; and

		(5)  She was erroneously discharged and should have been transferred to the Retired Reserve.

	e.  The Personnel Actions Branch Chief and the D&E Team Chief conferred on her case and determined:

		(1)  too much time had elapsed since her discharge and subsequent request for transfer and discharge effective 4 April 2006;

		(2)  She was erroneously transferred during the D&E process to the wrong "CURRORG code" (Y instead of R); however, they can no longer effect a correction to her record; and

		(3)  she should submit a request to the ABCMR to have her status changed from Y to R.

8.  DODD 1235.13 states that officers who have fulfilled their mandatory service obligation and have not taken action to elect to remain in the IRR shall be advised of the requirement to remove them from the military.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's contention that her record should be corrected to show she was transferred to the Retired Reserve was found to have merit.

2.  The evidence of record shows HRC approved the applicant's request for retirement and directed that her status be changed to CURRORG-USAR Retired Reserve (R).  However, she was erroneously discharged from the USAR on 4 April 2006.

3.  The evidence of record shows the HRC Personnel Actions Branch Chief and the D&E Team Chief state she was retired, but her CURRORG code needs to be changed from "Y" to "R."  Therefore, her record should to be corrected to show her CURRORG code as "R."

BOARD VOTE:

___X____  ___X____  ___X____  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION


BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined the evidence presented is sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by:

	a.  by voiding her discharge effective 4 April 2006;

	b.  by showing she was transferred to the USAR Control Group (Retired Reserve) effective 4 April 2006; and

	c.  changing her CURRORG code to Retired Reserve (R).



      __________X______________
                 CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.


ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100020919



5


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080007303

    Original file (20080007303.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that her discharge from the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) on 14 January 2008 be voided and that her record be corrected to show that in February 2007 she elected to be placed in a Reserve unit. Instructions in the applicant's transfer orders informed her that she would be discharged or transferred to the Retired Reserve (if eligible) 1 year from 27 December 2006 unless she provided the MSO form requesting to remain in the Individual Ready Reserve (IRR). The official...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150001599

    Original file (20150001599.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests: * the Board finds that he was improperly discharged from the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) in 2007 * adjustment of his mandatory removal date (MRD) to reflect the breaks in service * restoration of his highest rank achieved, lieutenant colonel (LTC), and that he be allowed to continue to serve in that capacity until mandatory retirement at age 60 * service credit in the rank of LTC retroactive to the date of his enlistment on 21 February 2014 2. On 3 April 2013, by email,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080017746

    Original file (20080017746.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests, in effect, that her record be corrected to show she was medically discharged/retired. Absent any evidence that a fitness determination on the applicant was made by the PEB, there is an insufficient evidentiary basis to support a conclusion that she suffered from a disqualifying medical condition that rendered unfit for further service at the time of her discharge from the USAR.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100021404

    Original file (20100021404.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The additional instructions in these orders state: "You will be discharged or transferred to the Retired Reserve (If eligible) one (1) year from the effective date of this order unless you provide the MSO election form requesting to remain in the IRR. It would further be appropriate to correct her record to show she made a timely MSO election to remain in the IRR on 18 September 2006 and by reinstating her VSI payments accordingly. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | AR20140009522

    Original file (AR20140009522.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 27 January 2015 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20140009522 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests consideration by the Fiscal Year 2015 (FY15) U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) General Officer Assignment Advisory Board (GOAAB) and General Officer Promotion Selection Board (GOPSB). On 7 May 2014, he contacted the GOAAB board team again to let them know he had not received his "Eligible" notification and wanted to submit his written desire to be...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060002228C070205

    Original file (20060002228C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    HRC Orders M-09-405574, dated 9 September 2004, ordered the applicant to active duty for 25 days of mobilization processing. HRC Orders M-09-405574R, dated 30 September 2005, revoked the applicant's order to active duty. b. Paragraph 4-5 (Delay or exemption) states that during a partial mobilization, Reserve Component members may be delayed or exempted from mobilization only under conditions shown in table 2-1 (rules 31 through 37).

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070006869

    Original file (20070006869.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that her records be corrected to show she is entitled to a 15-year non-regular retirement based on her medical disqualification from the United States Army Reserve (USAR). On 19 September 2006, HRC, St. Louis, Missouri, informed the applicant by memorandum that the PEB determined that she was unfit for duty and that she was permanently disqualified and must be separated from the USAR. On 18 October 2006, HRC St. Louis, Missouri, published Orders Number...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110010390

    Original file (20110010390.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests back payment, reinstatement, and continuance of Voluntary Separation Incentive (VSI) pay. The evidence of record shows the applicant was honorably discharged from active duty on 1 August 1993 and authorized VSI payment for 20 years (until August 2013). As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. showing the applicant made an MSO election, electing to remain in the Individual Ready...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090012219

    Original file (20090012219.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The advisory official stated that, due to the applicant having been transferred to the inactive list on 19 June 2007 and subsequently transferred back to the USAR Control Group (Reinforcement) on 15 August 2007, he was not on the Reserve Active Status List (RASL) for one continuous year prior to the convening date of the 2007 DA Reserve Components Colonel AMEDD Selection Board. If selected for promotion, his orders to the Retired Reserve should be voided, his promotion effective date and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090014261

    Original file (20090014261.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that her 6 November 2008 discharge orders from the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) Control Group (Reinforcement) to the Standby Reserve (Inactive List) for failure to submit an AHRC Form 4145 (Election of Options- Military Service Obligation (MSO)) be voided. On 17 November 2008, the applicant completed her AHRC Form 4145 election statement. The evidence of record shows that USAHRC-St. Louis officials mailed the applicant an AHRC Form 4145 election statement on...