Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100020876
Original file (20100020876.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  15 March 2011

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20100020876 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) be corrected to show his foreign service.

2.  He states he served in Vietnam. 

3.  He provides no additional evidence. 

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant's records show he enlisted in the Regular Army on 14 June 1971.  He completed Basic Combat Training (BCT) at Fort Dix, New Jersey and 

Advanced Individual Training (AIT) at Fort Belvoir, Virginia.  On 9 November 1971, he was awarded military occupational specialty (MOS) 62B (Engineer Equipment Maintenance).  In November 1971, he was assigned to Fort Riley, Kansas.  

3.  Documents in his records, such as Article 15s, Servicemen's Group Life Insurance Election, orders, and a Letter of Appreciation, all verify that at the time of issuance, he was assigned to Fort Riley.  These documents were dated between November 1971 and May 1973.

4.  His DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record), block 31 (Foreign Service) and block 38 (Record of Assignments), does not show any foreign service.

5.  On 11 May 1973, he was honorably discharged due to hardship.  His 
DD Form 214 shows he was credited with 1 year, 10 months, and 28 days of active federal service.  His last duty assignment is listed on his DD Form 214 as D Company, 34th Engineer Battalion, Fort Riley.  

6.  The applicant's DD Form 214, block 22c (Foreign and/or Sea Service) contains the entry "0 - 0 - 0" which indicates there was no period of foreign service.  

7.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) establishes standardized policy for preparing and distributing the DD Form 214.  The regulation states the DD Form 214 is a summary of a Soldier's most recent period of continuous active duty.  It provides a brief, clear-cut record of active duty service at the time of release from active duty, retirement, or discharge.  Paragraph 2-4, in pertinent part, requires the preparer to enter the total amount of foreign service completed in item 22c from the period covered in item 22a(1) (Net Service This Period). 

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  There is no evidence to support the applicant's contention that he served in Vietnam.  In fact, the evidence suggests he spent his entire enlistment, with the exception of BCT and AIT, at Fort Riley, Kansas.  

2.  In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting his request. 






BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X___  ___X____  ___X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _______ _   _X______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100020876



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100020876



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100001060

    Original file (20100001060.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states that: a. he cannot remember any dates surrounding his military service; b. he does recall he was in Vietnam for almost a year to the date c. his Vietnam service shown in item 30 of his DD Form 214 is wrong; and d. he was separated on temporary records because a captain swore to him there was no record of him being in the Army. The applicant contends item 22c and item 30 of his DD Form 214 should be corrected. Regarding the applicant’s request for a complete history of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050003383C070206

    Original file (20050003383C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 1 NOVEMBER 2005 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20050003383 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) be corrected to show his foreign service duty.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100011600

    Original file (20100011600.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states that he served in the DMZ in Korea from July 1970 to August 1971 and he desires his DD Form 214 to reflect this service. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states that the Korea Defense Service Medal (KDSM) is authorized for award to members of the Armed Forces of the United States who served on active duty in support of the defense of the Republic of Korea. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110009991

    Original file (20110009991.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of the amount of foreign service on his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge). The applicant states his DD Form 214, block 22c (Foreign and/or Sea Service) shows he only served 1 month and 6 days; however, he served in Vietnam from 11 May 1971 to 25 December 1971. He had served 1 year, 11 months, and 1 day of active service and his DD Form 214 issued at the time of his REFRAD reflects in block 22c that he served...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090014320

    Original file (20090014320.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    This form also shows: a. With respect to his unit of assignment, the evidence of record shows he was assigned to the 630th Engineer Company in Vietnam within USARV. Although at the time of separation he was assigned to USAMEDDAC, Fort Gordon, GA, his DD Form 214 erroneously listed his last unit of assignment as USAREUR with the 137th Engineer Company.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080011428

    Original file (20080011428.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states, in effect, that his service record shows he served in the Republic of Vietnam and Okinawa, but his DD Form 214 only shows Foreign Service in USARPAC (United States Army, Pacific). Army Regulation 635-5, in effect at the time of the applicant's separation, prescribes that the DD Form 214 should show the Soldier's total active duty outside continental limits of the United States for the period covered by the DD Form 214 and the last overseas theater in which service was...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070010310

    Original file (20070010310.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's DD Form 214 shows that he had 3 years of active federal service at the time of his discharge on 15 January 1964. His records also show that he was separated from Fort Campbell, Kentucky. There is no evidence and the applicant has not provided any, to show he served in Vietnam.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110002420

    Original file (20110002420.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show he served in Vietnam during the period May to July 1968 and that he had a major medical problem. The applicant provides his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge), his DD Form 47 (Record of Induction), DA Form 1811 (Physical and Mental Status on Release from Active Service), DA Form 2292 (U.S. Army Advance Emergency Order to Active Duty), U.S. Army Reserve Components Personnel and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090007434

    Original file (20090007434.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states, in effect, that he served 2 years in Vietnam; however, his DD Form 214 reflects only 1 year and 6 days of foreign service in block 22c (Foreign and/or Sea Service). The applicant’s DD Form 214 shows that he was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal, but it does not show that he was awarded any bronze service stars to signify campaign participation credit. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100018131

    Original file (20100018131.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) be corrected to reflect both his tours of duty in Vietnam and Ethiopia in block 22c (Foreign and/or Sea Service) and that his military education be corrected to reflect the period August 1964 to March 1965. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960) was awarded by the Government of Vietnam to all members of the Armed...