Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100020849
Original file (20100020849.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	    16 February 2011

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20100020849 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Combat Infantryman Badge.

2.  The applicant states he served in combat for over 30 days in 1968-1969, but was denied award of the Combat Infantryman Badge on the grounds that he had received a debt complaint.

3.  The applicant provides his DD Form 214.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant's military records show he was inducted into the Army of the United States on 26 October 1966.  He completed initial entry training, was awarded the military occupational specialty (MOS) of infantry operations and intelligence specialist, and was promoted to pay grade E-5.

3.  He was appointed as a Reserve commissioned officer in the rank of second lieutenant on 19 October 1967.  He was assigned to the infantry branch with a primary specialty of 1542 (Infantry Officer).

4.  His DA Form 66 (Officer Qualification Record) shows he served in the Republic of Vietnam during the period 15 October 1968 to 14 September 1969.  On 20 October 1968, he was assigned to Headquarters and Headquarters Company, 3d Battalion, 503d Infantry, 173d Airborne Brigade.  On 25 April 1969, he was reassigned for duty as a rifle platoon leader with Company B, 3d Battalion, 503d Infantry, 173d Airborne Brigade.  On 12 August 1969, he was further assigned as an executive officer with Company D, 3d Battalion, 503d Infantry, 173d Airborne Brigade.

5.  On 18 September 1969, he was released from active duty and transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve Control Group (Annual Training).  He had attained the rank of first lieutenant and had completed 2 years, 10 months, and 23 days of combined commissioned and enlisted active duty service.

6.  His personnel service record does not contain orders awarding him the Combat Infantryman Badge.

7.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states there are basically three requirements for award of the Combat Infantryman Badge.  The Soldier must be an infantryman satisfactorily performing infantry duties, he must be assigned to an infantry unit during such time as the unit is engaged in active ground combat, and he must actively participate in such ground combat.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  By regulation, in order to support award of the Combat Infantryman Badge, an officer must have been awarded and served in an infantry specialty while assigned to an infantry unit in addition to evidence the Soldier was personally present and participated with the qualifying infantry unit while it was engaged in active ground combat with enemy forces.  There is no evidence in the available records and he did not provide sufficient evidence to corroborate that he personally engaged in active ground combat with enemy forces.  Therefore, there is insufficient evidence to show he met the eligibility criteria for award of the Combat Infantryman Badge.
2.  In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X____  __X____  ___X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _______ _ X______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100020849



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100020849



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050004761C070206

    Original file (20050004761C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 15 NOVEMBER 2005 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20050004761 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant states that he received orders for the CIB in the field in Vietnam but, was not given the award citation and it was not included on his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120018539

    Original file (20120018539.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB). His record shows he served in an infantry battalion in Vietnam in duty MOS 11B with principal duties as a rifleman and team leader. However, there is no evidence of record to show he ever served in active ground combat.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130005213

    Original file (20130005213.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His DD Form 214 for this period shows: a. his last duty assignment was the 516th PSC, U.S. Army Vietnam; b. his MOS as 71B (Clerk Typist); c. his service in the Republic of Vietnam from 18 September 1971 to 26 April 1972; and d. he was awarded or authorized the: * National Defense Service Medal * Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) * Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960) * Army Commendation Medal * Vietnam Service Medal 9. The 3d Battalion, 503d Infantry, was awarded the: *...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090012600

    Original file (20090012600.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Additionally, evidence shows that the applicant participated in four campaigns during his service in Vietnam. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting from item 24 of his DD Form 214 the Vietnam Service Medal; b. awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal for the period 27 January 1967 to 3 November 1968; c....

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002072960C070403

    Original file (2002072960C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    His DA Form 20, item 38, Record of Assignments, shows that his conduct and efficiency were rated as excellent throughout his service. Although the applicant's DA Form 20 shows that he was twice a patient while in Vietnam, there is no evidence to show he was a patient because he was wounded in action; therefore, there is insufficient evidence to show he met the eligibility criteria for award of the Purple Heart. Although the applicant had a record of accepting nonjudicial punishment early...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130000553

    Original file (20130000553.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides copies of: a. DD Forms 214 (Certificate of Release of Discharge from Active Duty) for the periods: * 29 October 1968 to 1 July 1969 * 2 July 1969 to 29 June 1973 * 15 November 1974 to 5 December 1976 * 6 December 1976 to 5 December 1980 b. enlistment documents covering his military service from 29 October 1968 to 5 December 1980. c. a message showing the applicant was wounded in action in Vietnam on 21 October 1970. d. DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record – Part...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080019229

    Original file (20080019229.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Headquarters, 173d Airborne Brigade (Separate), General Orders Number 797, dated 8 May 1967, show the applicant received the Army Commendation Medal for meritorious service for the period 6 October 1966 to 14 April 1967. Therefore, his records should be corrected to show this award. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the first award of the Army Good Conduct Medal for the period 1 October...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004100341C070208

    Original file (2004100341C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for partial relief and to excuse failure to timely file. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing that he was awarded the first award of the Good Conduct Medal for the period 19 September 1966 to 2 September...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002067973C070402

    Original file (2002067973C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 600-8-22 provides for the award of the CIB to a soldier who is an infantryman satisfactorily performing infantry duties, who is assigned to an infantry unit during such time as the unit is engaged in active ground combat, and must actively participate in such ground combat. Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-3 shows that the 2d Battalion, 503d Infantry was awarded the Presidential Unit Citation for action on 16 March 1966, the Meritorious Unit Citation for the period 5 May...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050005889C070206

    Original file (20050005889C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Soldier must be an infantryman satisfactorily performing infantry duties, he must be assigned to an infantry unit during such time as the unit is engaged in active ground combat, and he must actively participate in such ground combat. Evidence of record clearly shows the applicant served in an infantry MOS while assigned to an infantry unit in Vietnam. Therefore, he is entitled to correction of his records to show this unit award.