Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100020810
Original file (20100020810.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		

		BOARD DATE:	  8 March 2011

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20100020810 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, that his records be documented to show he is eligible to participate in the Transfer of Education Benefits (TEB) under the provision of the Post-9/11 GI Bill.

2.  The applicant states his dependents are not shown on his records as being potentially entitled to receipt of his educational benefits.  He would like to transfer a portion of his educational benefits to his daughter and son.

3.  The applicant provides copies of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), his children's birth certificates and Social Security Cards, and 14 related documents from his official military record.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant served on active duty from 13 January 1987 through 31 March 2008.  He retired based on longevity in the rank and pay grade of sergeant first class/E-7.

2.  On 18 August 2010, the applicant requested that the Administrative and Resources Directorate Training Branch update his records to reflect his dependents were eligible for transfer of his Post 9/11 GI Bill educational benefits. The Directorate's response to this request is not available.


3.  In the development of this case, an advisory opinion was obtained from the Office of the Deputy Chief of Staff, G-1, Enlisted Professional Development Branch.  It was opined that the applicant is not eligible to transfer his benefits under the Post 9/11 GI Bill program, because he retired prior to implementation of the policy.  Further, the Army does not have legal authority to grant exceptions to policy allowing those who retired or separated prior to 1 August 2009 to transfer their Post 9/11 GI Bill benefits.

4.  A copy of the advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant and he did not respond.

5.  On 22 June 2009, the Department of Defense (DOD) established the criteria for eligibility and transfer of unused education benefits to eligible family members.  The policy states any member of the Armed Forces on or after 
1 August 2009, who, at the time of the approval of the individual’s request to transfer entitlement to educational assistance under this section, is eligible for the Post 9/11 GI Bill, and:

	a.  has at least 6 years of service in the Armed Forces on the date of election and agrees to serve 4 additional years in the Armed Forces from the date of election; or

	b.  has at least 10 years of service in the Armed Forces (active duty and/or Selected Reserve) on the date of election, is precluded by either standard policy (service or DOD) or statute from committing to 4 additional years, and agrees to serve for the maximum amount of time allowed by such policy or statute, or

	c.  is or becomes retirement eligible during the period from 1 August 2009 through 1 August 2013.  A service member is considered to be retirement eligible if he or she has completed 20 years of active duty or 20 qualifying years of reserve service.

6.  The policy further states the Secretaries of the Military Departments will provide active duty participants and members of the Reserve Components with qualifying active duty service individual pre-separation or release from active duty counseling on the benefits under the Post-9/11 GI Bill and document accordingly and maintain records for individuals who receive supplemental educational assistance under Public Law 110-252, section 3316.




7.  On 10 July 2009, the Army released the Post 9/11 GI Bill Implementation Policy which identified and established responsibilities, eligibility criteria, benefits, and detailed guidance on the administration of the program.  The policy states, in part, that those who retire on or before 1 August 2009 are, by law, not eligible to transfer unused Post 9/11 GI Bill benefits because their last day of duty will be 31 July 2009 and they will transfer to the Retired List on 1 August 2009.  However, the policy does apply to those so retired if they are recalled to active duty and serve on or after 1 August 2009 and before 2 August 2012.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant requests that his records be documented to show he is eligible to participate in the TEB under the provision of the Post-9/11 GI Bill.

2.  The applicant retired on 31 March 2008 more than a year and a half prior to the enactment of the law allowing the transfer of Post 9/11 GI Bill educational benefits. 

3.  The law requires a member to be in an active duty status at the time the member makes the request for the transfer.  Soldiers separated prior to 1 August 2009 are not eligible to participate unless they are recalled to active duty and serve on or after 1 August 2009 and before 2 August 2012.  

4.  There are no provisions for retroactive entitlement.  Therefore, the applicant cannot be granted relief.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___x_____  ___x_____  ____x____  DENY APPLICATION







BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _____________x__________________
                     CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100020810



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100020810



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100016063

    Original file (20100016063.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Public Law 110-252, dated 30 June 2008, authorized the Post-9/11 GI Bill effective 1 August 2009. The policy states, in part, that those who retire on or before 1 August 2009 are, by law, not eligible to transfer unused Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits because their last day of duty will be 31 July 2009 and they will transfer to the Retired List on 1 August 2009. Those who retire on or before 1 August 2009 are, by law, not eligible to transfer unused Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits because their last...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100023523

    Original file (20100023523.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The policy further states the Secretaries of the Military Departments will provide active duty participants and members of the Reserve Components with qualifying active duty service individual pre-separation or release from active duty counseling on the benefits under the Post-9/11 GI Bill and document accordingly and maintain records for individuals who receive supplemental educational assistance under Public Law 110-252, section 3316. Those who retire on or before 1 August 2009 are, by...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110014582

    Original file (20110014582.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He states that he retired from active duty on 31 October 2009 and he was eligible to transfer his educational benefits to his dependents under the TEB provisions of the Post-9/11 GI Bill because he had an approved retirement date after 1 August 2009 and before 1 July 2010, with no additional service required. The applicant's military records show he enlisted in the Regular Army on 7 September 1988 and he was honorably retired on 31 October 2009. As a result, the Board recommends that...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120010733

    Original file (20120010733.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant had more than 20 years of service upon retirement; therefore, he was eligible to transfer to either his spouse or children if he had completed the request prior to leaving military service. On 22 June 2009, the DOD established the criteria for eligibility and transfer of unused education benefits to eligible family members. There is insufficient evidence that shows the applicant submitted a request to transfer education benefits to his family members while on active duty.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110021661

    Original file (20110021661.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, an exception to policy to transfer his educational benefits to eligible dependents under the Transferring Educational Benefits (TEB) provisions of the Post-9/11 GI Bill. The applicant had more than 21 years of service upon retirement, so he was eligible to transfer benefits to either his spouse or children if he completed the request before leaving military service. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110024019

    Original file (20110024019.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The policy further states the Secretaries of the Military Departments will provide active duty participants and members of the Reserve Components with qualifying active duty service individual pre-separation or release from active duty counseling on the benefits under the Post-9/11 GI Bill and document accordingly and maintain records for individuals who receive supplemental educational assistance under Public Law 110-252, section 3316. The law was dated 30 June 2008, 6 months prior to his...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110017776

    Original file (20110017776.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The policy states, in part, that those who retire on or before 1 August 2009 are, by law, not eligible to transfer unused Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits because their last day of duty will be 31 July 2009 and they will transfer to the Retired List on 1 August 2009. The evidence of record shows he was honorably retired on 31 August 2009 after completing more than 22 years of service. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120002773

    Original file (20120002773.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant had 16 years of service as of the program’s implementation date of 1 August 2009; therefore, he was eligible to transfer to either his spouse or his children. A service member is considered to be retirement eligible if he or she has completed 20 years of active duty or 20 qualifying years of reserve service. The applicant did not and could not have requested a transfer of his benefits to his dependents on 3 June 2009.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120010851

    Original file (20120010851.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant had more than 20 years of service upon his retirement, but he was not eligible to transfer to either his spouse or his children because the law requires Soldiers to be in the service on or after 1 August 2009. c. A Soldier may only transfer to eligible family members. If the applicant had been in the service on 1 August 2009, he would not have incurred an additional service obligation, but he was not eligible because he left service prior to 1 August 2009. e. A Soldier must...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110021656

    Original file (20110021656.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, an exception to policy to transfer his educational benefits to eligible dependents under the Transfer of Education Benefits (TEB) provisions of the Post-9/11 GI Bill. The policy states, in part, that those who retire on or before 1 August 2009 are, by law, not eligible to transfer unused Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits because their last day of duty will be 31 July 2009 and they will transfer to the Retired List on 1 August 2009. As a result, the Board...