Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100020523
Original file (20100020523.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	    8 March 2011

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20100020523 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show his rank/grade as specialist five (SP5)/E-5 instead of specialist four (SP4)/E-4.

2.  The applicant states he departed Vietnam before his promotion could catch up to him.

3.  The applicant provides:

* Letter Orders Number D7-325, issued by The Adjutant General, Washington, DC, dated 11 July 1972
* a DA Form 199 (Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) Proceedings), dated
29 June 1972
* his DD Form 214

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a 


substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant was inducted into the Army of the United States on 25 May 1965.  He completed training and he was awarded military occupational specialty (MOS) 71B (Clerk Typist).

3.  His DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows he served in Vietnam from 11 May 1966 to 8 May 1967.

4.  On 10 May 1967, the applicant was honorably released from active duty (REFRAD) under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations - Enlisted Personnel), chapter 5, as an overseas returnee.  He was transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) Control Group (Annual Training) to complete his remaining Reserve obligation.  The DD Form 214 he was issued at the time shows he completed 1 year, 11 months, and 16 days of total active service.  It also shows in item 5 his rank/grade as SP4/E-4.

5.  On 1 May 1970, the applicant applied to the ABCMR, contending that he should have been retired by reason of physical disability rather than being REFRAD and transferred to the USAR.

6.  On 13 October 1971, the applicant appeared before an ABCMR panel with counsel.  The ABCMR concluded that he was physically unfit for duty on the effective date of his REFRAD.  As a result, the ABCMR corrected his records to show he was retired on 10 May 1967 by reason of temporary physical disability and he was placed on the Temporary Disability Retired List (TDRL) in the rank/grade of SP4/E-4.

7.  On 27 March 1972, a DD Form 215 (Correction to DD Form 214) was issued correcting his DD Form 214 to show he was retired by reason of temporary disability and he was transferred to the USAR Control Group (Retired).  At this time his retirement grade [SP4] was not in question.

8.  Letter Orders Number D7-325, dated 11 July 1972, were published showing the applicant was determined to be permanently unfit for duty by reason of physical disability.  Therefore, he was removed from the TDRL and permanently retired in current grade.  These orders addressed the applicant as "SP5."


9.  His available record contains a Finance Center, U.S. Army (FCUSA) Form
20-74 (Request for Information and/or Reply to Correspondence) initiated by the Chief, Retired Pay Division, Indianapolis, IN, to The Adjutant General, Washington, DC, dated 31 August 1972, requesting verification of the applicant's retirement grade.

10.  On 20 July 1973, the U.S. Army Military Personnel Center, Alexandria, VA, published Letter Orders Number D7-812.  These orders amended Letter Orders Number D7-325 that directed the applicant's removal from the TDRL and permanent retirement to read "SP4" instead of "SP5."

11.  There is no evidence of record and the applicant did not provide any evidence to show he was ever promoted to SP5 during his active duty service.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The orders announcing his removal from the TDRL were addressed to him as SP5.  That was apparently an administrative error, and the order was amended to correct his rank to SP4.

2.  There is no available evidence to show the applicant ever attained the rank of SP5.

3.  In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's requested relief.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__X_____  ___X___  __X_____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case 


are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      ___________X_________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100020523



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100020523



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120019408

    Original file (20120019408.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's record is void of any evidence showing he was ever promoted to the rank/grade of SP4/E-4 at any time during his service. _______ _ _x______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case. ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20120019408 3 ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 1 ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100009492

    Original file (20100009492.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides the following documents: * a copy of his DD Form 214 for the period ending 26 February 1968 * a copy of Special Orders Number 13, dated 16 January 1968 CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. (2) If the grade at the time of separation is not permanent, the permanent grade, date of appointment, and date of rank, if different from date of appointment will be entered in item 30. c. Item 30 is used to complete entries too long for their respective blocks and/or as a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110001834

    Original file (20110001834.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The temporary appointment of a Regular Army enlisted Soldier automatically becomes permanent on the date of completion of the specific time in grade (TIG) and time in service (TIS) requirements, and are reflected as: a. (2) If the grade at the time of separation is not permanent, the permanent grade, date of appointment, and date of rank, if different from date of appointment will be entered in...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060005137C070205

    Original file (20060005137C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states, in effect, that he was advanced to the pay grade of E-4 on 2 May 1969 and was subsequently permanently retired by reason of physical disability in the rank of SP4. Title 10, U.S. Code, Section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. Accordingly, his DD Form 214 should be corrected to reflect in blocks 5a., 5b., and 6, that his rank is SP4, pay grade E-4, and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130016567

    Original file (20130016567.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) records to show: * His active Reserve service * Promotion to Staff Sergeant (SSG)/E-6 * Change in his military occupational specialty (MOS) 2. His record contains a Promotion Recommendation and Board Report Form dated 8 August 1977 which listed his current rank as SP5 and shows he was recommended for promotion to SSG. The evidence of record shows he held no military status from 26 March 1971 to 3 October 1972 and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070018177

    Original file (20070018177.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show the correct rank/grade and date of separation. The DD Form 214 he was issued at the time captured his active duty service from the date of his induction (15 August 1966) to the date of his separation from active duty (14 August 1968). Evidence of record shows that the applicant’s appointment/promotion to the temporary grade of SP5/E-5 was effective on 30 September 1968, after the applicant was separated from active duty.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100019611

    Original file (20100019611.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    BOARD DATE: 8 February 2011 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20100019611 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. He states: * his Army dream was to move up in the ranks * his unit was ambushed in Vietnam and both of his legs were wounded * the Army retired him and he couldn't fulfill his dream * he wants to be advanced on the Retired List so he can have a higher rank on his tombstone in Arlington 3. This service may consist of combined active service and service in the U.S. Army Reserve Control...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004100832C070208

    Original file (2004100832C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Linda D. Simmons | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant states, in effect, that he satisfactorily served as a SFC/E-7 on active duty and he requests that his rank and pay grade on the Retired List be corrected to reflect the highest grade he held and in which he served on active duty, which was SFC/E-7. In view of the facts of this case, it would be appropriate to correct the applicant’s record to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140018089

    Original file (20140018089.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states: * item 3a of his DD Form 214 shows his rank/pay grade as SP4/E-4 (temporary) * his rank/pay grade at the time of his discharge was SP5/E-5 * he was promoted to SP5/E-5 while serving on active duty 3. The applicant provides: * DD Form 214 * DD Form 256A (Honorable Discharge) from the U.S. Army effective 31 October 1969 CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. The evidence of record shows he held the temporary rank of SP4/E-4 at the time he was released from active duty on 24...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060015522

    Original file (20060015522.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Therefore, he is entitled to correction of his records to show this award. The applicant's DD Form 214 shows that he was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected to show that he was awarded the Purple Heart; the Combat Infantryman Badge; the Good Conduct Medal for the period 6 February 1967 to 1 July 1969; the Vietnam Service Medal, with two bronze service stars; the Republic of...