Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100020458
Original file (20100020458.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		

		BOARD DATE:	  11 January 2011

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20100020458 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests change of his Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) beneficiary from his brother to his spouse.

2.  The applicant states he was never briefed about changing the beneficiary from his brother to his current spouse within one year of his marriage.  He has been paying SBP premiums since he retired in September 2002.  He retired in 31 August 2002 and he was unmarried at the time.  He placed his brother as an insurable interest at the time.  He just noticed that his Retiree Account Statement does not have his beneficiary information. 

3.  The applicant provides his:

* Retiree Account Statement
* Marriage Certificate
* Divorce Decree
* DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty)

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 23 August 1978 and held military occupational specialty 92G (Food Service Sergeant).

2.  He provides a copy of a divorce decree that shows he and his spouse, E----, were divorced on 25 March 1998.  Their divorce decree is silent regarding the SBP.
3.  His DD Form 214 shows he retired on 31 August 2002 by reason of sufficient service for retirement and he was placed on the retired list in the rank/grade of sergeant first class (SFC)/E-7 on 1 September 2002.

4.  There is no indication he completed a DD Form 2656 (Date for Payment of Retired Personnel) or that he elected or declined enrollment in the SBP.

5.  He provides a copy of a marriage certificate that show he and his spouse,
R------, were married on 26 July 2005.  However, there is no indication he notified officials at the Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) of his marriage.

6.  He provides a Retiree Account Statement, dated 18 April 2009, that shows he has SBP spouse coverage at a monthly cost of $158.87.  Additionally, the statement shows that he has paid 79 months toward his 360 months of SBP coverage (indicating he has been paying SBP premiums since September 2002).

7.  On 26 August 2010, by email, a DFAS official indicated that there was no SBP election on file (at DFAS) for the applicant.  Because there was no election on file, as required, the SBP defaulted to automatic coverage, deducting the cost as if he had a spouse.  Additionally, there was nothing on file regarding his marital status.

8.  Public Law 92-425, enacted 21 September 1972, established the SBP.  The SBP provided that military members on active duty could elect to have their retired pay reduced to provide for an annuity after death to surviving dependents. An election, once made, was irrevocable except in certain circumstances.  A person who is not married and does not have a dependent child upon becoming eligible to participate in the SBP may elect to provide an annuity to a natural person with an insurable interest in the member.  Elections are made by category, not by name.  An election to decline to participate in the SBP must be made prior to the effective date of retirement or else coverage automatically defaults to full spouse (or child only coverage, if applicable) coverage)

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The available evidence shows the applicant was divorced in March 1998.  His divorce decree did not indicate he had dependent children or address any future SBP.  There is no indication in the available records that he remarried between the date he was divorced in March 1998 and the date he retired in August 2002. 

2.  It appears that since he was still unmarried at the time he retired in August 2002, he did not make an SBP election.  However, his pay records did not indicate he was unmarried at the time.  Accordingly, as required by law, his SBP coverage defaulted to spouse coverage.  There is no evidence in his records that shows he made an SBP election for his brother.

3.  He married on 26 July 2005 but failed to notify DFAS of his remarriage.  His pay records show he has paid SBP premiums based on his defaulted spouse coverage since 2002 and continues to pay premiums today.  The applicant, in effect, has had spouse SBP coverage since his retirement.

4.  Since the applicant was unmarried and had no children at the time he retired and since he was not obligated by his divorce decree to elect former spouse coverage, he should not have had SBP coverage (unless he specifically chose coverage for an insurable interest) and thus he should not have paid premiums from September 2002 through July 2006 (one year from the date of his remarriage).

5.  In view of the foregoing, it would be appropriate to correct his records to show he elected spouse coverage within one year of his remarriage and reimbursing him of any premiums he paid from September 2002 (date he retired) to July 2006 (one year from the date of his marriage).

BOARD VOTE:

___x_____  ____x____  ___x____  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by:

	a.  showing the applicant accurately and timely completed the appropriate form electing to participate in the SBP for his new spouse's benefit, to be effective 25 July 2006; 

	b.  showing DFAS timely received and processed the appropriate form; and

	c.  reimbursing any premiums already paid by the applicant from the date of retirement to the date SBP coverage began.



      _________x______________
       	   CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100020458



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100020458



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060011415

    Original file (20060011415.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states, in effect, that he remarried on 17 March 2006 and submitted a request to change his SBP election from former spouse to spouse coverage. In addition, in the absence of a court order to provide an SBP annuity to this former (second) spouse and any evidence of record to show that the applicant's former (second) spouse made an attempted deemed election to DFAS for former spouse SBP coverage, it is presumed the applicant's former (second) spouse is not entitled to an SBP...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | AR20140009159

    Original file (AR20140009159.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides: * Letter from DFAS, dated 15 January 2014 * DD Form 2656 (Date for Payment of Retired Personnel), dated 13 May 2014 * Divorce decree, dated 21 November 1991 * DD Form 2656-6 (SBP Election Change Certificate), dated 14 May 2014 * Certificate of marriage, dated 1 June 2012 CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. An election to decline to participate in the SBP must be made prior to the effective date of retirement or else coverage automatically defaults to full spouse (or child...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140013522

    Original file (20140013522.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his records to show he changed his Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) election from former spouse to spouse coverage. On 14 July 2014, the applicant and Sallie were married and on 28 July 2014, he submitted a DD Form 2656-6 (SBP Election Certificate Change) to DFAS. Public Law 99-661, dated 14 November 1986, permitted divorce courts to order SBP coverage (without the member’s agreement) in those cases where the retiree had elected spouse coverage...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100028852

    Original file (20100028852.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his record to show he elected to discontinue participation in the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) and dismissal of the $10,502.66 debt established by the Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) for SBP premiums he did not pay when he remarried after he retired from military service. The evidence of record does not support the applicant's request for correction of his record to show he elected to discontinue participation in the SBP or...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130013763

    Original file (20130013763.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his records to show he elected to participate in the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) for spouse coverage at the reduced amount and reimbursement of premiums collected due to being charged premiums for spouse coverage at the full amount. However, he provides an unsigned/archived DD Form 2656 that shows: * he and Ella were married on 24 May 2001 * he elected coverage for spouse * his election was based on a reduced amount of $675.00 6. As a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140018015

    Original file (20140018015.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provided the FSM's DD Form 2656, dated 17 May 2003, showing the FSM elected former spouse coverage. The applicant provided a letter from DFAS, dated 16 June 2014, which states: * she was not entitled to receive an annuity under SBP * the FSM elected to cover her under SBP upon his retirement * a spouse loses eligibility as a spouse beneficiary upon divorce * retirees have the option to change their spouse coverage to former spouse coverage upon divorce, but the request from...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080015572

    Original file (20080015572.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 4 April 2006, the Board denied the applicant’s request for correction of the FSM’s records to show he changed his SBP election from spouse to former spouse within one year of their divorce. The Board further informed the applicant that should DFAS determine that the FSM’s second spouse is not eligible for the FSM’s SBP annuity, or the applicant can provide irrefutable evidence that the second spouse was not married to the FSM prior to 7 March 2005, she was encouraged to submit a request...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090016230

    Original file (20090016230.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant previously stated that when he retired, he was married to Maria and elected SBP spouse coverage. Incorporated herein by reference are military records which were summarized in the previous consideration of the applicant's case by the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) in Docket Number AR20090003862 on 25 August 2009. The evidence of record shows that prior to his retirement, the applicant elected to participate in the SBP for spouse coverage.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130014175

    Original file (20130014175.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    An election to terminate spouse coverage under this law, once made, is irrevocable. When he and Maureen were divorced, the coverage did not change but the spouse premiums were suspended. The applicant does not now have the option to terminate his SBP election.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110016016

    Original file (20110016016.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The divorce decree ordered him to pay child support for their permanently disabled child born on 1 November 1970. The evidence of record shows upon receipt of his 20-year letter, the applicant executed a DD Form 1883 on 21 April 1997, electing "spouse only" coverage under option C (immediate coverage). With respect to his request to change his SBP election from "spouse only" to "child only," once a member elects option C coverage, they cannot change options.