Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100020409
Original file (20100020409.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		

		BOARD DATE:	  1 March 2011

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20100020409 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests his reentry (RE) code be changed to an RE code which would allow him to reenlist.

2.  The applicant states the ramifications of the RE code he was assigned was not properly explained to him.  He contends that if he had known he would not be able to reenlist he would not have chosen to get out.  He adds that since he was given a choice of whether he would leave the Army, the RE code that he was assigned was inappropriate in view of the fact that he had no previous disciplinary problems and he was an outstanding Soldier.

3.  The applicant provides excerpts from his military records which show his accomplishments, training and awards.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant’s military records show that he enlisted in the Regular Army     on 25 July 2006, and he was awarded military occupational specialty 11B (Infantryman).  He served in Iraq from 23 March to 1 July 2007 and from            29 November 2007 to 29 December 2008.  He was promoted to pay grade E-4.

2.  The applicant was counseled on:

* 10 March 2009 for testing positive for marijuana
* 27 March 2009 for lying to military police investigators and hindering an investigation
* 14 April 2009 for testing positive for marijuana [a second time] 
* 16 April 2009 for failure to be at his appointed place of duty at the prescribed time

3.  On 5 May 2009, his commander notified him of his intent to recommend him for discharge due to misconduct, illegal use of drugs.  He was advised of his rights to consult with counsel and to submit statements in his own behalf.  He consulted with counsel but did not submit a statement in his own behalf.

4.  On 12 May 2009, his commander forwarded a recommendation to discharge the applicant for misconduct, drug abuse.  That recommendation was approved by the appropriate authority.

5.  Accordingly, on 21 May 2009, he was discharged for misconduct, drug abuse.  His service was characterized as under honorable conditions and he was assigned the separation code of "JKK" and an RE code of 4.

6.  Army Regulation 635-200 (Active Duty Enlisted Administrative Separations) sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.  Chapter 14 of the regulation deals with separation for various types of misconduct, which includes drug abuse, and provides that individuals identified as drug abusers may be separated prior to their normal expiration of term of service.  

7.  Pertinent Army regulations provide that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes, based on their service records or the reason for discharge.  Army Regulation 601-210 coverers eligibility criteria, policies, and procedures for enlistment and processing into the Regular Army and the U.S. Army Reserve.  Chapter 3 of that regulation prescribed basic eligibility for prior service applicants for enlistment.  That chapter included a list of armed forces RE codes.  Those RE codes include RE-1 which applies to individuals who were fully qualified for reenlistment when last separated.  Soldiers assigned an RE-1 are fully qualified for enlistment.  The code RE-3 applies to individuals who are not qualified for continued Army service, but the disqualification is waiverable.  Soldiers assigned an RE-3 are ineligible for enlistment unless a waiver is granted.  The code RE-4 applies to individuals who are not qualified for continued Army service and the disqualification is not waiverable.  Soldiers assigned an RE-4 are ineligible for enlistment.  

8.  Separation Program Designator (SPD)/Reentry (RE) Codes Cross Reference Table shows that the SPD code of "JKK" is to be assigned an RE code of 4.


DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  Contrary to his contention, he was not given the choice of whether he was to be discharged for misconduct.  He was only given the choice of whether he consulted with counsel and whether he would submit a statement in his own behalf.

2.  He tested positive for marijuana twice and he was counseled for lying to military police investigators, hindering an investigation, and failure to be at his appointed place of duty at the prescribed time.

3.  Given his repeated misconduct, which included two incidents of testing positive for marijuana, he was properly discharged for misconduct, drug abuse and assigned an RE code of 4.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___x_____  ____x____  ___x_____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      _______ _ x  _______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100020409



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100020409



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110001498

    Original file (20110001498.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. The record confirms the applicant was separated by reason of misconduct (drug abuse) based on his wrongful use of cocaine. Absent any evidence of error or injustice in the separation process, there is an insufficient evidentiary basis to support granting the requested relief.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130009504

    Original file (AR20130009504.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The evidence shows that on 27 May 2010, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c, AR 635-200, for commission of a serious offense, specifically for testing positive for marijuana on a unit urinalysis conducted on 22 March 2010, and 3 May 2010. The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed action and recommended approval of the separation with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. The...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120007512

    Original file (20120007512.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests an upgrade of his general discharge under honorable conditions to a fully honorable discharge and correction of associated codes. On 20 November 2010, the applicant's immediate commander notified him of his intent to initiate separation action against him in accordance with paragraph 14-12c of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations - Enlisted Personnel), by reason of misconduct - commission of a serious offense (wrongfully possessing and using marijuana...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130015686

    Original file (AR20130015686.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 15 April 2011, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation efforts and directed the applicant’s discharge with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. The applicant was discharged from the Army on 19 May 2011, with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c(2), AR 635-200, for misconduct (drug abuse), a Separation Program Designator code (SPD) of JKK and an RE code...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130004617

    Original file (AR20130004617.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicant’s discharge with a characterization of service of general under honorable conditions. Army Regulation 635-5-1 (Separation Program Designator (SPD) Codes) provides the specific authorities (regulatory or directive), reasons for separating Soldiers from active duty, and the SPD codes to be entered on the DD Form 214. By abusing illegal drugs, the applicant knowingly risked a military career and diminished the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120012945

    Original file (20120012945.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. Army Regulation 635-5-1 (Separation Program Designator (SPD)) Codes) provides the specific authorities and reasons for separating Soldiers from active duty, and the SPD codes to be entered on the DD Form 214. It states SPD code JKK is the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100014774

    Original file (20100014774.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 2 May 2007, the applicant was notified of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 14, for misconduct - commission of a serious offense (drug abuse). Army Regulation 601-210 (Active and Reserve Components Enlistment Program) states, in pertinent part, prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned reentry codes, based on their service records or the reason for discharge. _______ _ __ X _______...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150001108

    Original file (20150001108.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 2 April 2013, the applicant's company commander notified him she intended to initiate separation action under the provisions of paragraph 14-12c(2) (Commission of a serious offense - abuse of illegal drugs), Army Regulation 635-200 (Active Duty Enlisted Administrative Separations). The applicant provides: a. The applicant requests his RE code be changed from RE-4 to RE-1 so that he can reenter the Army.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110003688

    Original file (20110003688.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He was presented with action to accept the court-martial or request discharge with no less than a general character of service. Army policy states that a discharge under other than honorable conditions is normally considered appropriate for a Soldier discharged for patterns of misconduct; however, the discharge authority may direct an honorable or general discharge if such is merited by the Soldier's overall record. SPD code "JKK" is the correct code for Soldiers separating under the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100016449

    Original file (20100016449.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 27 May 2008, the unit commander notified the applicant of his intent to initiate action to separate him under the provisions of chapter 14, Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations), by reason of misconduct for testing positive for marijuana. The separation reason in all separations authorized by this paragraph will be "misconduct – abuse of illegal drugs." Pertinent Army regulations provide that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes...