Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100019343
Original file (20100019343.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  6 January 2011

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20100019343 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, that he be awarded an individual award or badge that qualifies as a combat stressor. 

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that he served in Leyte in combat and was in the invasion of Cebu in the Philippines and should have been awarded a combat award that qualifies as a verifiable stressor. 

3.  The applicant provides a hand-written letter and a letter from the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA).

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant’s military records are not available for review.  A fire destroyed approximately 18 million service members’ records at the National Personnel Records Center in 1973.  It is believed that the applicant’s records were lost or destroyed in that fire.  However, there were sufficient documents remaining in a reconstructed record to conduct a fair and impartial review of this case.

3.  The applicant was inducted in New York City on 12 July 1944.  He completed his training as a cook/baker and was transferred to the Western Pacific Theater of Operations (WPTO) on 11 January 1945.  He arrived in the WPTO on 18 February 1945 and participated in the Southern Philippines Campaign.

4.  He was promoted to the rank of sergeant on 31 May 1946 and was awarded the military occupational specialty of a mess sergeant.  He departed the WPTO on 23 July 1946 and was transferred to Fort Dix, New Jersey where he was honorably discharged on 10 August 1946.  

5.  His WD AGO Form 53-55 (Enlisted Record and Report of Separation – Honorable Discharge) issued at the time of his discharge shows that he was awarded the Army of Occupation Medal, the Asiatic-Pacific Campaign Medal, the Good Conduct Medal, the Philippines Liberation Medal, and the World War II Victory Medal.   

6.  The available records show no evidence of the applicant being awarded or recommended for award of any additional decorations.  His final pay worksheet also reflects that he did not receive combat infantryman pay.

7.  The VA accepts the awards of the Purple Heart, the Combat Infantryman Badge, a Combat Medical Badge, a valor award, or similar combat citation as conclusive evidence of a combat stressor.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  While it is understood why the applicant desires to be awarded an award that qualifies as a combat stressor there is no evidence that he was awarded such an award or that he was recommended for such an award that was not processed to completion.  Therefore, in the absence of such evidence there is no basis to do so at this time.

2.  Additionally, the Board has never awarded a badge or award simply for the purpose of qualifying for VA benefits.  Accordingly, there is no basis to grant his request.

3.  In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust.  The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X____  ____X___  ____X___ DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1. The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.

2.  The Board wants the applicant and all others concerned to know that this action in no way diminishes the sacrifices made by the applicant in service to the United States during World War II.  The applicant and all Americans should be justifiably proud of his service in arms.





      _______ _   _X_____   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100019343





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100019343



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090017033

    Original file (20090017033.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Although this unit served in post-war Japan until 15 March 1950, it did not receive occupation credit for the AOM according to Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-1. The applicant states he served with the 132nd Infantry Regiment and arrived in Japan on 8 September 1945 with that unit. Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-1 shows the 132nd Infantry Regiment received occupation credit for post-war Japan service from 8 September 1945 to 15 November 1945.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040008943C070208

    Original file (20040008943C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides: a. The applicant’s military records are not available to the Board for review. In response to a request from the applicant, the National Personnel Records Center (NPRC), St. Louis, Missouri issued the applicant a DA Form 1577 (Authorization for Issuance of Awards), dated 11 October 1989, showing his entitlement to the Good Conduct Medal, WW II Victory Medal, Philippine Liberation Ribbon, and Asiatic-Pacific Campaign Medal with 4 bronze service stars, representing...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150000487

    Original file (20150000487.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant, the daughter of a deceased former service member (FSM), requests correction of the FSM's WD AGO Form 53-55 (Enlisted Record and Report of Separation - Honorable Discharge) to show award of the Philippine Liberation Medal. The applicant provides: * the FSM's WD AGO Form 53-55 * historical documentation pertaining to the history of the 803rd Field Artillery CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant's contentions that the FSM's record should be corrected to show award of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110023550

    Original file (20110023550.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states his records do not show his service in Japan. The applicant's military records are not available to the Board for review. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting from item 33 of his WD AGO Form 53-55 the Asiatic-Pacific Campaign Medal with one bronze service star, and b. adding to item 33 his WD AGO Form 53-55 the: * Asiatic-Pacific Campaign Medal with two bronze service stars *...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150003476

    Original file (20150003476.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 29 October 2015 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20150003476 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant, the son of a former service member (FSM), requests correction of the FSM's WD AGO Form 53-55 (Enlisted Record and Report of Separation Honorable Discharge) to show the: * Purple Heart * Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB) * All other awards he may be authorized 2. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130018943

    Original file (20130018943.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's military service records are not available to the Board for review. Army Reserve Personnel Center, St. Louis, MO, authorized the issuance of the following decorations to the applicant: * Presidential Unit Citation * Bronze Star Medal (based on award of the Combat Infantryman Badge) * Army Good Conduct Medal * American Campaign Medal * Asiatic-Pacific Campaign Medal with one bronze service star * World War II Victory Medal * Army of Occupation Medal with Japan Clasp * Combat...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001062127C070421

    Original file (2001062127C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, correction of his WD AGO Form 53-55 (Enlisted Record and Report of Separation-Honorable Discharge) to show award of the Philippine Defense Ribbon and the Philippine Independence Ribbon. APPLICANT STATES : That his unit, the 226th Field Artillery (FA) Battalion (Bn), was part of the XXIV Corps during the Leyte Campaign. DISCUSSION : Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003090653C070212

    Original file (2003090653C070212.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. 9. Review of the applicant's service personnel records indicates entitlement to additional awards that are not shown on his separation document. Army Regulation 600-8-22, paragraph 5-13, governs award of the Asiatic- Pacific Campaign Medal and it states, in pertinent part, that a bronze service star is authorized for each campaign a member participated in while serving in the WPTO.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140013073

    Original file (20140013073.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his WD AGO Form 53-55 (Enlisted Record and Report of Separation of Honorable Discharge) to show award of the Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM) and the Philippine Liberation Medal (officially known as the Philippine Liberation Ribbon). The applicant's complete military records are not available to the Board for review. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120005502

    Original file (20120005502.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 8 November 2012 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20120005502 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. He states the FSM's original WD AGO 53-55 showed he was authorized the Army Occupation Medal; however a new form that was issued does not indicate this award. _______ _ __X_____ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.