IN THE CASE OF:
BOARD DATE: 12 July 2011
DOCKET NUMBER: AR20100018946
THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:
1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).
2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests correction of the location used to calculate his basic allowance for housing (BAH) for the period January 2008 through April 2009 in accordance with All Army Activities (ALARACT) Message 021/2008.
2. He states his permanent change of station (PCS) after completing basic combat training (BCT) and advanced individual training (AIT) was Fort Carson, CO. He reported to his unit of assignment on 3 January 2008 and shortly afterward he was informed that his unit would be deploying in support of Operation Iraqi Freedom (OIF) in March 2008. The short period from his PCS to the actual deployment required his family members to reside separately in the state of Florida. He further states that his rear commander at the time indicated he could leave his family in Florida and receive BAH with dependents at the Florida rate.
3. He states while deployed in Iraq he requested a BAH exception to policy through his unit on four occasions. Through either neglect or not knowing how to process his request, it never made it past brigade level. In the meantime, his situation put a hardship on his pregnant wife and two children. At that time he was a private/pay grade E-2, his rent was $1,400.00 each month, and the difference between the BAH rate for Fort Carson of $909.00 compared to Florida of $1,629.00 would definitely have helped his situation had his BAH been calculated at the Florida rate. After returning from his deployment in February 2009, he moved his family to Colorado. He was subsequently reassigned to a new unit where he sought assistance from his chain of command and the Inspector General's Office at Fort Carson. He was informed as to how to properly process a BAH exception to policy. He further states he learned of ALARACT Message 021/2008 and applied for a retroactive waiver, but his request was denied by the Headquarters, Department of the Army (HQDA), Deputy Chief of Staff, G-1, who stated that BAH waivers are not retroactive and the Army Board for Correction of Military Records is the only mechanism for recoupment of the lost allowances.
4. He provides:
* DD Form 4 (Enlistment/Reenlistment Document Armed Forces of the United States)
* Orders 337-588, U.S. Army Maneuver Support Center and Fort Leonard Wood, Fort Leonard Wood, MO
* Orders 071-1004, Headquarters, Division West, First U.S. Army and Fort Carson, Fort Carson, CO
* memorandum for record from Commander, Hotel Company, 204th Brigade Support Battalion, 2nd Brigade Combat Team, 4th Infantry Division, Fort Carson, CO
* Commanding General's Hotline Inquiry Situation Report
* Real Estate Lease, dated 1 August 2006
* Rental Agreement, dated 27 February 2009
* ALARACT Message 021/2008
* email
* Enlisted Record Brief, dated 9 July 2010
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 20 August 2007. He successfully completed BCT and AIT and was awarded military occupational specialty 88M (Motor Transport Operator).
2. Orders 337-588 issued by U.S. Army Maneuver Support Center and Fort Leonard Wood, dated 3 December 2007, show he was to proceed on PCS to Fort Carson, CO, with a reporting date of 3 January 2008.
3. His Enlisted Record Brief shows he reported to Fort Carson on 3 January 2008 and was assigned to the 64th Brigade Support Battalion, 3rd Brigade Combat Team, 4th Infantry Division.
4. Orders 071-1004 issued by Headquarters, Division West, First U.S. Army and Fort Carson, dated 11 March 2008, amended Orders 250-707, changing his unit effective date for deployment in support of OIF to on or about 12 March 2008.
5. His Joint Uniform Military Pay System (JUMPS) Leave and Earnings Statements (LES) for the period 1-30 April 2008 and 1-31 May 2008 show his BAH with dependents based on zip code 80913 [Fort Carson].
6. He returned from Iraq on 3 February 2009 and relocated his family from Florida to Colorado. A rental agreement, dated 27 February 2009, shows he and his spouse signed a lease for rental property in Colorado Springs, CO.
7. On 22 December 2009, he was reassigned to Company H, 204th Brigade Support Battalion, 2nd Brigade, 4th Infantry Division, Fort Carson.
8. A memorandum for record, Hotel Company, 204th Brigade Support Battalion, 2nd Brigade Combat Team, 4th Infantry Division, Fort Carson, dated 4 May 2010, subject: Request Back Pay for BAH, shows the applicant's company commander requested BAH back pay in his behalf. His commander stated the applicant arrived at Fort Carson in December 2007. His family resided in the state of Florida during his BCT and AIT. His commander further stated, "Soldier's unit was on orders to deploy to Iraq in March of 2008. Soldier has repeatedly submitted this request for BAH waiver while deployed to Iraq during 2008. He continued to receive BAH at the Colorado rate and not the rate authorized
.This oversight is not the result of a lack of action on the part of the Soldier. The Soldier's previous chain of command failed him and his family in correcting this."
9. An email to HQDA, Office of the Deputy Chief of Staff, G-1, dated 7 May 2010, indicates a BAH waiver request was submitted on behalf of the applicant by his first sergeant.
10. An email from HQDA, Office of the Deputy Chief of Staff, G-1, dated 21 June 2010, states deployment waivers are granted to Soldiers when they report to a new duty station after 30 January 2008 for the purpose of deploying and deploy within 12 months, and leave their dependents at their previous duty station, as BAH was based on duty station. BAH waivers are not retroactive.
11. In the processing of this case, an advisory opinion was obtained from HQDA, Office of the Deputy Chief of Staff, G-1. The advisory official did not support granting administrative relief.
a. The advisory official stated that Title 37, section 403(d)(3)(A), allows the Secretary concerned to determine if circumstances of an assignment "require" a member's dependents to reside separately from the member. The Army implemented its BAH waiver policy in ALARACT 021/2008 on 6 February 2008. The policy enables Soldiers who meet the waiver guidance to receive BAH based on their previous duty station location or the area in which their dependents reside.
b. The advisory official continued that a Secretarial waiver authority did not exist at the time the applicant was seeking a BAH waiver based on his deployment. Moreover, at the time her staff received the requests the applicant had already returned from deployment, executed his PCS entitlements authorized by law, and relocated his family to Fort Carson.
12. A copy of the advisory opinion was provided to the applicant for information and to allow him the opportunity to submit comments or a rebuttal. He did not respond.
13. On 18 December 2010, he was honorably retired by reason of permanent disability in the rank of specialist/pay grade E-4.
14. ALARACT Message 021/2008, dated 5 February 2008, subject: Exception to Policy Guidance for BAH Waivers, states that circumstances requiring family members to reside separately from the member due to Soldiers receiving PCS orders to units deploying within 12 months of arrival qualify for a Secretary of the Army BAH waiver.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. The applicant was reassigned to Fort Carson after completing BCT and AIT. The evidence indicates the PCS was accomplished within 12 months of his new unit of assignment being deployed in support of OIF. The waiver policy was authorized in February 2008; he was deployed in March 2008. As such, he was eligible to apply for a BAH waiver. His request for a BAH waiver that finally reached the appropriate office was disapproved based on being retroactive.
2. While there is no error, it would be appropriate in the interest of equity and justice for the applicant's military records to be corrected to show he was granted a BAH waiver effective February 2008 prior to his deployment thereby allowing for continuation of his BAH based on the Florida area zip code until 3 February 2009.
BOARD VOTE:
__X_____ __X_____ ___X____ GRANT FULL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
1. The Board determined the evidence presented is sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing a BAH waiver was approved for the Florida area zip code effective 5 February 2008.
2. The Board further recommends that based on the above correction, the Defense Finance and Accounting Service pay the applicant any difference in BAH due him for the period 5 February 2008 through 3 February 2009.
_______ _ x _______ ___
CHAIRPERSON
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20100018946
3
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20100018946
5
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100016278
The applicant requests correction of the location used to calculate his Basic Allowance for Housing (BAH) for the period 16 June 2008 through 30 November 2009 in accordance with all Army activities (ALARACT) Message 021/2008. Joint Force Headquarters, Tennessee National Guard, memorandum, subject: BAH Waiver Request (applicant's name), dated 29 March 2010, in support of the applicant's waiver request, shows the applicant was transferred from the Tennessee National Guard Joint Force...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130009768
He provides: * self-authored memoranda, subject: [Applicant], Request for BAH Waiver to Retain BAH at Current Duty Location, dated 20 March 2013 and 10 April 2013 * e-mail correspondence * BAH waiver request template * document entitled Instructions to Obtain a BAH Waiver for PCS * ALARACT 021/2008 * ALARACT 324/2012 * letter, dated 11 March 2013, regarding his son's standing as a student * Officer Record Brief (ORB) * orders * Military Leave and Earnings Statement CONSIDERATION OF...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120008288
The applicant provides: * ALARACT Message 021/2008, dated 5 February 2008 * Orders 112-0439, issued by U.S. Army Installation Management Command, Headquarters, U.S. Army Garrison Command, Fort Knox, Fort Knox, KY, dated 22 April 2010 * DA Form 4187 (Personnel Action), Request for Intra-Group Reassignment, dated 25 May 2010 * Lease Agreement, dated 1 June 2010 * Orders 06-023, issued by Headquarters, 3rd Special Forces Group (Airborne), Fort Bragg, NC, dated 23 June 2010 * Memorandum for...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120004737
He stated: a. he is a Title 32 AGR Soldier mobilized in support of overseas contingency operations, and requests a Secretarial BAH waiver based upon his previously approved exception to policy to receive BAH at his last duty station of (Adelphi, MD, 20783) due to his command directed No/Low cost move, effective 21 April 2011, to a unit mobilizing within 12 months of his assignment on 30 August 2011; b. effective 21 April 2011, he was transferred to HHC, 29th Combat Aviation Brigade, Edgewood...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100020481
The opinion states: a. the applicant was receiving the proper BAH entitlement for his permanent duty station locations, Fort Stewart, GA and Fort Polk, LA. In order to qualify for a BAH Secretarial waiver in 2009/2010, his spouse must have continued to reside at his previous duty station, Fort Stewart, GA during his second deployment from Fort Polk, LA. ____________X____________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130015179
The JFTR states that when Reserve Component (RC) Soldiers are ordered to active duty and a PCS order is not issued, BAH rate is based on the primary residence location at the time the Soldier was ordered to active duty. However, if the member is called or ordered to active duty and a PCS order is not issued, BAH/OHA rate is based (paid) on the primary residence location at the time called/ordered to active duty"; and c. there is no distinction made in the PPG or JFTR for AGR BAH when the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110024967
The applicant requests correction of his military records to show he was granted a secretarial waiver to receive basic allowance for housing (BAH) based on his dependent's location, Korea, instead of his duty station, Fort Irwin, CA. The applicant provides: * a copy of his permanent change of station (PCS) orders to Camp Casey, Korea with a report date of 30 July 2008 * a copy of his PCS orders to Weed Army Community Hospital, Warrior Transition Unit (WTU), Fort Irwin, CA with a report date...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130020933
The applicant provides: * his marriage license * Orders 213-50, U.S. Army Garrison, Fort Monroe, VA, dated 1 August 2011 * a copy of his wife's teaching contract with New Beginnings Charter School, Bedford Stuyvesant, Brooklyn, New York, dated 15 August 2012 * Orders 271-1008, Installation Management Command (IMCOM) Pacific Region, Military Personnel Division, Republic of Korea on 27 September 2012 * a lease agreement for a residence in Queens, NY * a memorandum for record (MFR), signed...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110012932
The applicant states her request for an exception to policy to receive BAH at the Fort Sam Houston area rate was denied. The evidence of record confirms the applicants request for an exception to policy was properly considered as required by ALARACT Message 021-2008 and that she was provided sufficient reasons for the denial of her request. The record further shows her case was properly evaluated by the Fort Lee IG and DA IG and both determined the applicant has received proper consideration.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130008379
f. The applicant's request was also for the dependents to complete state testing, which was through 13 May 2011, with the end of the school year date of 10 June 2011, not 5 July 2011. h. He cannot make clear enough that though the advisory opinion states the program has been in the JFTR since 2005 and he was finally able to see the ALARACT message in the August/September 2011 time frame, he has executed five PCSs since 2005 and he has never been apprised of the availability of the program. ...