Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100018866
Original file (20100018866.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  7 April 2011

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20100018866 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests to be awarded Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) benefits.

2.  The applicant states she was not aware the appropriate action necessary for her to receive an SBP annuity based on the death of her former husband, a former service member (FSM), had not been taken.  She claims to have been informed the necessary action had been taken at the time of her divorce from the FSM.

3.  The applicant provides the FSM's death certificate, divorce decree, attorney letter, and court order in support of her application.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The record shows the applicant initially entered the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) in an enlisted status on 10 July 1956 and served in the USAR or Army National Guard (ARNG) in an enlisted status until 23 February 1971 at which time he was honorably discharged.  He reentered service in an enlisted status on 7 July 1971 and served in that status until being honorably separated on 9 September 1984 to accept an appointment as a warrant officer on 10 February 1984.

3.  On 1 July 1972, the FSM and applicant were married.

4.  On 12 January 1988 while serving in the Indiana ARNG, the FSM received a Notification of Eligibility for Retired Pay at Age 60 from the State of Indiana Military Department.  This document confirms the FSM completed the required years of qualifying service to be eligible for retired pay at age 60.

5.  The record contains a partially legible DD Form 1883 (SBP Election Certificate) that shows the FSM elected spouse and children SBP coverage at the full amount under option C (Immediate Coverage).  The date this election form was completed and signed is not clear on the form.

6.  On 3 February 2003, the FSM and applicant were divorced.  The divorce decree was issued by Grant Superior Court Number 2, Grant County, State of Indiana.  This document orders a division of pensions be carried out by means of a qualified court order that provides for payment to the applicant for the remainder of her life the monthly sum of $650.00 during the life of the FSM, with that sum increasing to $1434.00 upon the death of the FSM.

7.  On 30 January 2004, the FSM was transferred to the Retired Reserve.

8.  On 16 February 2009, the FSM died.

9.  On 20 July 2009, a court order awarded the applicant interest in the military retired pay of the FSM.  The order was issued in Grant Superior Court Number 2, Grant County, State of Indiana.  This document awarded the applicant a survivor benefit in the military retirement of the FSM.  It indicated that in the event of the FSM's death, the applicant would be paid $717.00 per month or the maximum survivor benefit, whichever is the lesser.

10.  The Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) pay records pertaining to the FSM show that full spouse SBP coverage, with the applicant listed as spouse, was in effect at the time of his death.  DFAS was never informed of the divorce and the SBP election was never changed to former spouse coverage.  The pay record also confirms that SBP premiums continued to be paid through the date of the FSM's death.

11.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1448(b)(3), permits a person who, incident to a proceeding of divorce, is required by court order to elect to provide an annuity to a former spouse to make such an election.  If that person fails or refuses to make such an election, section 1450(f)(3)(A) permits the former spouse concerned to make a written request that such an election be deemed to have been made.  Section 1450(f)(3)(C) provides that an election may not be deemed to have been made unless the request from the former spouse of the person is received within 1 year of the date of the court order or filing involved.

12.  When SBP is court-ordered, the former spouse may make a deemed election within 1 year of the divorce.  When SBP is not court-ordered, the retiree may make a written request to change spouse coverage to former spouse coverage voluntarily.  Otherwise, participation remains in a suspended status until the retiree gains another spouse who will become the beneficiary after completing 1 year of marriage unless the retiree desires not to resume spouse coverage.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's claim of entitlement to an SBP annuity based on the FSM's death was carefully considered and found to have merit.

2.  By law, a deemed election by a former spouse can be made when SBP coverage is directed in a court order incident to a proceeding of divorce.  The divorce decree confirms payment to the applicant by the FSM and directs division of military retired pay and benefits be covered by a separate court-order.  Even though the court order authorizing survivor benefits was not published until after the FSM's death, it is clear that both the applicant and FSM believed the coverage continued for the applicant after their divorce.  This is evidenced by the fact the FSM continued to pay SBP premiums with the applicant listed as the FSM's beneficiary through the date of his death.

3.  Further, there is no evidence the FSM remarried, as evidenced by the fact no remarriage is documented in the DFAS record and he never modified his SBP election to name a new spouse as beneficiary prior to his death.  The lack of a named new spouse beneficiary for unpaid retired pay at the time of the FSM's death is evidenced by DFAS pay records.

4.  Based on the evidence of record, it appears the FSM clearly intended to continue to provide SBP coverage for the applicant as a former spouse.  Thus, it would be appropriate to correct the record to show the FSM changed his SBP election from spouse to former spouse on the date of his divorce from the applicant and to provide the applicant all SBP annuity payments due from the date of the FSM's death.

BOARD VOTE:

____X___  ____X___  ___X____  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined the evidence presented is sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing the FSM changed his SBP election from spouse to former spouse on 3 February 2003, the date of his divorce from the applicant, and by providing the applicant all SBP annuity payments due from 16 February 2009, the date of the FSM's death.



      ____________X_____________
                 CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100018866



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100018866



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060013553

    Original file (20060013553.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    There is no evidence of record which indicates the applicant submitted a written request for a deemed election for former spouse coverage, although the 1983 divorce decree did not entitle her to make a request for a deemed election. Public Law 99-661, dated 14 November 1986, permitted divorce courts to order SBP coverage (without the member’s agreement) in those cases where the member was participating in the SBP or was still on active duty and had not yet made an SBP election. But neither...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070004116

    Original file (20070004116.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Copies of DA Form 4240 (Data for Payment of Retired Army Personnel) dated 13 November 1979 which shows the deceased retiree elected spouse only SBP coverage. The divorce decree did not award the SBP to the applicant nor did the applicant provide a deemed election to DFAS within one year from the date of divorce. Title 10, U. S. Code, section 1450(f)(3)(A) permits a former spouse to make a written request that an SBP election of former spouse coverage be deemed to have been made when the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140011733

    Original file (20140011733.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests the records of her deceased former husband, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show he changed his Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) coverage from "spouse" to "former spouse" within 1 year of his divorce and payment of the SBP annuity based on his death. However, the FSM's pay records do not reflect receipt of the former spouse election from the FSM nor did DFAS receive a deemed election request from the applicant within one year of the divorce. When the FSM...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130002952

    Original file (20130002952.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Counsel requests the FSM’s record be corrected to show the applicant as the former spouse beneficiary for the FSM's SBP benefits. Counsel states at the time of their divorce the FSM and the applicant were unaware of the requirement set forth in the U.S. Code requiring a former spouse deemed election with respect to the FSM's SBP. On 14 August 2012, DFAS stated, in response to the above letter, that in order for a former spouse to be eligible for the SBP the former spouse had to be awarded...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110017562

    Original file (20110017562.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states: * she and the FSM gave the best years of their lives to the Army * the only reason she divorced the FSM is because of what Operation Desert Storm did to him; he came back a different man * their divorce decree clearly stipulated that she was to be the beneficiary under the SBP at the FSM's expense * the FSM paid SBP premiums from his retired pay each and every month * in spite of their divorce, she and the FSM spoke at least once a week * when the FSM knew he was dying...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120017588

    Original file (20120017588.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant, the former spouse of a deceased former service member (FSM), requests correction of the FSM's record to show he changed his Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) coverage to former spouse coverage. The FSM and the applicant divorced on 21 August 1995 and the FSM's election changed to no beneficiary. Public Law 99-661, dated 14 November 1986, permitted divorce courts to order SBP coverage (without the member's agreement) in those cases where the retiree had elected spouse coverage at...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100017236

    Original file (20100017236.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests the records of her deceased former husband, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show she is the beneficiary of his Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) annuity and life insurance policy. The FSM's records at DFAS show the FSM married Dawana on 16 December 1995. Therefore, in the event of the FSM's death, any SBP benefits would have to be paid to the beneficiary in effect at the time of death, his spouse, not his former spouse, if they had been married for at least...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130017318

    Original file (20130017318.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    In a letter dated 4 June 2012, DFAS advised the applicant that their records did not show that the FSM had ever requested to change his SBP election from spouse to former spouse. The applicant contends, in effect, that the records of the FSM should be corrected to show he changed his SBP election from spouse coverage to former spouse coverage and to pay her an SBP annuity. The applicant did not request an SBP election of former spouse coverage be deemed to have been made within one year of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140021639

    Original file (20140021639.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests the records of her deceased former husband, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show he changed his Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) coverage from "spouse" to "former spouse" within 1 year of the divorce and payment of the SBP annuity based on his death. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1450(f)(3)(A), permits a former spouse to make a written request that an SBP election of former spouse coverage be deemed to have been made when the former spouse is awarded the SBP...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070004347C080407

    Original file (20070004347C080407.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) election made by her deceased ex-spouse, a former service member (FSM), be changed from spouse to former spouse coverage. Thus, it would be appropriate to correct the record to show that the FSM changed his SBP election from Spouse to Former Spouse on the date of his divorce from the applicant, and to provide the applicant all SBP annuity payments due from the date of the FSM's death. As a result, the Board recommends that...