BOARD DATE: 25 January 2011
DOCKET NUMBER: AR20100018139
THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:
1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).
2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests the removal of the 23 December 2003 record of nonjudicial punishment (NJP) under Article 15, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), from his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF).
2. The applicant states, in effect, that he was falsely accused and not given a chance to defend himself. He was too afraid to take the matter to a court-martial.
3. The applicant provides a copy of the DA Form 2627 (Record of Proceedings under Article 15, UCMJ).
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicants failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a
substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted,
has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicants failure to timely file. In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.
2. The applicant enlisted in the Tennessee National Guard on 29 May 1998. He completed training and was awarded military occupational specialty (MOS) 95B (Military Policeman).
3. On 23 February 2003, his unit was ordered to report to Fort Campbell, KY for a period not to exceed 24 months in support of contingency operations for Operation Enduring Freedom.
4. On 23 December 2003, the applicant accepted NJP for violation of Article 134 (General Article) by willfully and wrongfully exposing his penis in an indecent manner to public view. He was afforded the opportunity to consult with counsel and to elect trial by court-martial in lieu of accepting NJP. He accepted NJP in lieu of demanding a trial by court-martial. His punishment was a reduction to
E-4, fine of 1/2 of 1 month's pay, 30 days of extra duty, and restriction (suspended for 6 months). The applicant's appeal of the punishment was denied. The commander directed that the DA Form 2627 be filed in the performance section of the applicant's OMPF.
5. On 19 February 2004, the applicant was released from active duty. The highest rank he attained while serving on active duty was sergeant/E-5.
6. Army Regulation 27-10 (Military Justice) prescribes the guidelines for the filing of NJP actions. It states that the decision to file the original DA Form 2627 on the performance or restricted section of the OMPF will be determined by the imposing commander at the time punishment is imposed. The filing decision of the imposing commander is final and will be indicated in item 5 of the DA Form 2627.
7. Army Regulation 600-8-104 (Military Personnel Information Management/ Records) provides that all personnel information recorded under the authority of this regulation is the property of the United States Government. Once recorded, it will not be removed except as provided by law or this regulation. Types of authorized military personnel files are the OMPF, Military Personnel Records Jacket (MPRJ), Career Management Individual File (CMIF), and the Classified Personnel Record (CPR). Once placed in the OMPF, the document becomes a permanent part of that file. The document will not be removed from a section or moved to another part of the OPMF unless directed by one or more of the following:
* the ABCMR
* the Department of the Army Suitability Evaluation Board (DASEB)
* Army Appeals Board
* the Chief, Appeals and Corrections Branch, Human Resources Command
* the OMPF custodian when documents have been improperly filed
* the Commander, Human Resources Command, ATTN: HRC-PDO-PO, as an approved policy change to this regulation
* the Chief, Appeals Branch, Human Resources Command, St. Louis, MO
* the Chief, Appeals Branch, National Guard Personnel Center.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. The applicant contends the NJP he received should be removed from his OMPF.
2. The evidence in this case shows the NJP was properly imposed against the applicant in accordance with the applicable laws and regulations in effect at the time, with no indications of any procedural errors that may have jeopardized his rights.
3. The evidence also shows that he was afforded due process in that he was afforded the opportunity to consult with counsel and to elect trial by court-martial in lieu of accepting the NJP. He chose to accept the NJP in lieu of demanding trial by court-martial. His appeal of the punishment was denied.
4. The imposing commander directed that the NJP be filed in the performance section of his OMPF. There is no evidence of error or injustice.
5. The applicant carries the burden of proof to show that the NJP was in error or unjust. Hr provided no evidence to support his claims. Since the NJP is facially valid, the Boards may presume administrative regularity.
5. In view of the above, there is no basis for granting the applicant's requested relief.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT FULL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
__x___ ____x____ ___x_____ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case
are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.
__________x______________
CHAIRPERSON
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20100016512
3
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20100018139
2
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100016512
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests the removal of a DA Form 2627 (Record of Proceedings Under Article 15, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ)) dated 6 April 2003 from his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF). The imposing commander directed that the NJP be filed in the applicant's performance section of his OMPF.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090007232
The applicant requests the removal of a DA Form 2627 (Record of Proceedings Under Article 15, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ)) dated 18 November 1998 from his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF). On 26 March 2009, the applicant's squadron commander, at the time, wrote a memorandum in support of removing the NJP from the applicant's OMPF. The squadron commander stated that the applicant has served with honor for more than 10 years since his infraction.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120007811
The imposing commander found the applicant guilty of the charges and imposed a reduction to SGT/E-5, suspended for 180 days. The DA Form 2627-2, dated 30 March 2010, as provided by the applicant, indicates the imposing commander requested remission of the applicant's NJP. This regulation states that the decision to file the NJP in the performance or restricted section of the OMPF will be determined by the imposing commander at the time punishment is imposed.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100020811
The applicant requests removal of a DA Form 2627 (Record of Proceedings Under Article 15, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ)) from his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF). The DA Form 2627 with continuation sheet shows: * on 15 May 2008 he willfully disobeyed a lawful command from a senior commissioned officer * on 16 May 2008 he failed to go at the prescribed time to his appointed place of duty * on 6 July 2008 he willfully disobeyed a lawful order from a senior NCO * on18...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120004527
The applicant requests, in effect, removal of a DA Form 2627-1 (Record of Proceedings Under Article 15, UCMJ), dated 23 November 1966, from his Army Military Human Resources Record (AMHRR), formerly known as the Official Military Personnel File (OMPF). a. Paragraph 11 states that Army personnel attached to or embarked in a vessel could not demand a trial by court-martial in lieu of NJP. __________X_____________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090008325
Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests, in effect, that his nonjudicial punishment (NJP) be set aside and that the DA Form 2627-1 (Record of Proceedings Under Article 15, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ)) dated 9 November 1971 be removed from his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF). Therefore, lacking evidence to establish that the applicant did not commit the misconduct for which NJP was imposed or...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110012042
The applicant requests the 7 March 2008 record of nonjudicial punishment (NJP) under Article 15, Uniform Code of Military Justice, either be removed from his official military personnel file (OMPF) or transferred to the restricted section. It states that applications for removal of an Article 15 from the OMPF based on an error or injustice will be made to the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR). This paragraph also provides that documents in the restricted section of the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100021312
The applicant requests correction of his military records by removing a DA Form 2627 (Record of Proceeding under Article 15, Uniform Code of Military Justice) from the restricted section of his official military personnel file (OMPF). This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. At...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080008520
The applicant requests correction of his military records to remove three records of nonjudicial punishment (NJP) and a Noncommissioned Officer Evaluation Report (NCOER) from his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF). Counsel requests, in effect, correction of the applicant's military records to remove three NJPs and one NCOER from his OMPF. There is no available evidence showing that the applicant appealed to the DASEB while on active duty to move the NJP he accepted on 18 April 2001 to...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110022149
The decision to file the original DA Form 2627 in the performance section or restricted section of the OMPF will be made by the imposing commander at the time punishment is imposed. It states that applications for removal of an Article 15 from the OMPF based on an error or injustice will be made to the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR). ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20110022149 3 ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 1 ABCMR Record...