Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100017648
Original file (20100017648.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  25 January 2011

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20100017648 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests upgrade of his under other than honorable conditions discharge to a general discharge.

2.  The applicant states his bipolar disorder and paranoid schizophrenia were the reasons he could not adapt to the military and he should be awarded at least a general discharge under honorable conditions.

3.  The applicant provides Ozark Guidance, Inc. medical records for the period
2 April 2009 through 30 November 2009; and two Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) claim applications, dated 20 June 2000 and 16 February 2010, respectively.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 14 September 1982. 

3.  On 17 October 1983, charges were preferred against him under the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) for being absent without leave (AWOL) from on or about 5 July 1983 to on or about 7 October 1983.  The record shows he was apprehended by civilian authorities in San Francisco, CA and he was subsequently returned to military control.

4.  On the same date, he consulted with legal counsel and he was advised of the basis for the contemplated trial by court-martial, the maximum permissible punishment authorized under the UCMJ, the possible effects of an under other than honorable conditions discharge, and of the procedures and rights that were available to him.  

5.  Subsequent to receiving this legal counsel, he voluntarily requested discharge under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, for the good of the service - in lieu of trial by court-martial.  He acknowledged he had been advised of and understood his rights under the UCMJ, and that he could receive an under other than honorable conditions discharge which would deprive him of many or all benefits as a veteran, and that he could expect to experience substantial prejudice in civilian life if he received an under other than honorable conditions discharge.

6.  In his request for discharge, he indicated he understood that by requesting discharge, he was admitting guilt to the charge against him, or to a lesser included offense that also authorized the imposition of a bad conduct or 
dishonorable discharge.  He further acknowledged he understood that if his discharge request was approved, he could be deprived of many or all Army benefits, that he could be ineligible for many or all benefits administered by the Veterans Administration (VA), and that he could be deprived of his rights and benefits as a veteran under both Federal and State laws.  He did not submit statements in his behalf.

7.  On 31 October 1983, the separation authority approved his request for discharge and directed the issuance of an Under Other than Honorable Conditions Discharge Certificate.

8.  On 10 November 1983, he was discharged accordingly.  He had completed 10 months and 23 days of creditable active military service and accrued a total of 94 days of time lost due to being AWOL.

9.  Available records do not contain a copy of his separation physical examination.
10.  There is no evidence he applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for upgrade of his discharge within its 15-year statute of limitations.

11.  In support of his application he provides his VA claim applications and medical treatment records from Ozark Guidance, Inc.  These medical records show he was incarcerated for 20 years for armed robbery and released on
19 February 2009.  He sought treatment for anxiety and mood swings and he was subsequently diagnosed with paranoid schizophrenia, polysubstance dependence, bipolar disorder versus substance induced mood disorder, anxiety disorder, and major depressive disorder moderate to severe with psychosis.  

12.  The documents submitted by the applicant show he was enrolled in the Alcohol & Drug Abuse Prevention and Control Program (ADAPCP) on 5 July 1983, which is the same date he was reported AWOL.

13.  Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.  Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may, submit a request for discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial.  The request may be submitted at any time after charges have been preferred and must include the individual's admission of guilt.  Although an honorable or general discharge is authorized, a discharge under other than honorable conditions is normally considered appropriate.

14.  Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7b, provides that a general discharge is a separation from the Army under honorable conditions.  When authorized, it is issued to a Soldier whose military record is satisfactory but not sufficiently meritorious to warrant an honorable discharge.  A characterization of under honorable conditions may be issued only when the reason for the Soldier’s separation specifically allows such characterization.

15.  Under the Manual for Court-Martial, the maximum punishment allowed for violation of Article 86, for being AWOL more than 30 days is a dishonorable discharge and confinement for 1 year.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The available evidence is insufficient to show his period of AWOL was a direct result of a mental condition.  However, the documents submitted by the applicant shows his chain of command attempted rehabilitation by enrolling him in the ADAPCP.  However, the applicant went AWOL on the same day and remained in that status for 94 days until he was apprehended by civilian authorities and returned to military control.

2.  His administrative separation was accomplished in compliance with applicable regulations with no indication of procedural errors which would tend to jeopardize his rights.  The type of discharge directed and the reasons therefore were appropriate considering all the facts of the case.

3.  In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X____  _____X__  ____X___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      ____________X___________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100017648



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100017648



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100027528

    Original file (20100027528.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    After interviewing the applicant and evaluating his behavior, the military psychologist concluded the applicant did not have a psychiatric disorder. On 7 December 1981, court-martial charges were preferred against him for one specification of being AWOL from 19 October to 1 December 1981. Paragraph 3-7b of Army Regulation 635-200 states that a general discharge is a separation from the Army under honorable conditions.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100011676

    Original file (20100011676.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. His record also shows he was charged with the commission of offenses punishable under the UCMJ with a punitive discharge and he voluntarily requested discharge under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, to avoid a trial by court-martial which may have resulted in a felony conviction. ___________x________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090002819

    Original file (20090002819.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 2 June 2009 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20090002819 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. On 27 October 1982, after consulting with counsel, the applicant submitted a request for discharge for the good of the service under the provisions of chapter 10 of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations – Enlisted Personnel). Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7b, provides that a general discharge is a separation from the Army under honorable conditions.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110019985

    Original file (20110019985.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests an upgrade of his general discharge to an honorable discharge. He submitted a statement in which he indicated: * he requested a discharge for the good of the service * he had one Article 15, no courts-martial, and no absence without leave * he joined the Army and thought he would become a good Soldier; however, he could not be a good Soldier because he did not like the Army and the way it worked * the Army was a strain on his emotions * he did not want to be in the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040010381C070208

    Original file (20040010381C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. While the applicant offers evidence of his hospitalization and treatment for schizophrenia, subsequent to his separation, he provides no evidence that the condition was the basis of his period of AWOL in 1986 or that he was unable to comprehend his decision to voluntarily request discharge rather than face a court-martial. The significant lapse of time between the applicant’s separation and his diagnosis of schizophrenia further supports...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140000063

    Original file (20140000063.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states: * he served in the Army from 3 November 1977 to 30 July 1984 with elite units of the Airborne Corps in Italy and Panama * he received awards, decorations, and badges * he achieved the rank/grade of sergeant/E-5 * he was proud to wear the uniform and be an airborne Soldier * he made mistakes at the end of his enlistment and he showed behavioral problems * his command missed what was happening to him as he was in the early stages of schizophrenia and he suffered from...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080007812

    Original file (20080007812.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant also understood that if his request for discharge was accepted, he may be discharged under other than honorable conditions and furnished an Under Other Than Honorable Conditions Discharge Certificate. There is no evidence in the applicant's military records, and the applicant failed to provide any evidence which shows that he suffered from bipolar disorder at any time during his military service. The applicant's record of service shows that he accepted NJP under Article 15 of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130003458

    Original file (20130003458.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He was discharged on 24 December 1991. The DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) he was issued shows he was discharged for the good of the service - in lieu of trial by court-martial with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. His service was not interrupted by any medical or mental condition.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150005979

    Original file (20150005979.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show he was medically discharged instead of being discharged for alcohol abuse rehabilitation failure. His DD Form 214 shows he was discharged on 18 September 1986 under the provisions of chapter 9 of Army Regulation 635-200 by reason of "alcohol abuse – rehabilitation failure" with a characterization of service of general under honorable conditions. The evidence of record shows the applicant suffered from alcohol abuse.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070010344

    Original file (20070010344.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    In his request for discharge, the applicant indicated that he understood that by requesting discharge, he was admitting guilt to the charge against him, or to a lesser included offense that also authorized the imposition of a bad conduct or dishonorable discharge. On 14 May 1987, the separation authority approved the applicant’s request for discharge and directed that he be issued an Under Other Than Honorable Conditions Discharge Certificate. There is no indication that the applicant...