Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100017224
Original file (20100017224.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		
		BOARD DATE:	  10 February 2011

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20100017224 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests his felony charge be dropped from his records so he can purchase a firearm legally (in effect, his general court-martial conviction be set aside). 

2.  The applicant states after the proper background check was done he purchased a firearm to protect himself and his family and thought nothing more of it.  Two weeks later he received a letter from the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives Agency informing him that he was a felon in possession of a firearm since he had been convicted of military crimes in 1985.  He was instructed to return the firearm as soon as possible, which he did.  

3.  He states it was then he realized his past had come back to haunt him after 25 years.  He points out:

* He was guilty then and he admitted to the charges against him
* He made a terrible mistake in his young life and destroyed a promising and bright future in the military
* He is still ashamed of himself
* He is a simple blue collared worker with simple values and beliefs
* He has been a law abiding citizen
* He is truly sorry for his actions
* He is not interested in any Department of Veterans Affairs benefits or an upgrade of his discharge 


4.  The applicant provides:

* Letter, dated 28 May 2010, from the National Personnel Records Center in St. Louis, MO
* Certification of Military Service
* Letter, dated 2 February 2010, from the U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives
* Documentation pertaining to his general court-martial
* DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty)
* Service personnel records

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant was born on 10 July 1960.  He enlisted in the Regular Army on 29 September 1978, served as a wheel vehicle mechanic, and was honorably discharged on 29 March 1982 for immediate reenlistment.  He reenlisted on 
30 March 1982 for a period of 3 years.  He was promoted to sergeant on 
6 September 1982.

3.  On 27 December 1985, he was convicted by a general court-martial of stealing 2700 liters of fuel and being derelict in the performance of his duties.  He was sentenced to be reduced to pay grade E-1, a forfeiture of all pay and allowances, to be confined for 22 months, and to be discharged from the service with a bad conduct discharge.  On 20 February 1986, the convening authority approved only so much of the sentence as provided for a bad conduct discharge, confinement for 9 months, a forfeiture of all pay and allowances, and reduction to pay grade E-1.  

4.  On 15 May 1986, the U.S. Army Court of Military Review affirmed the findings and sentence.  On 16 June 1986, the convening authority ordered the bad conduct discharge to be executed.
5.  He was issued a bad conduct discharge on 11 July 1986 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 3, as a result of a court-martial.  He had served 7 years, 1 month, and 28 days of creditable active service with 225 days of lost time.  

6.  Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for separation of enlisted personnel.  Chapter 3 of this regulation states that a Soldier will be given a bad conduct discharge pursuant only to an approved sentence of a general or special court-martial.  The appellate review must be completed and the affirmed sentence ordered duly executed. 

7.  Court-martial convictions stand as adjudged or modified by appeal through the judicial process.  In accordance with Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552, the authority under which this Board acts, the ABCMR is not empowered to set aside a conviction.  Rather it is only empowered to change the severity of the sentence imposed in the court-martial process and then only if clemency is determined to be appropriate.  Clemency is an act of mercy or instance of leniency to moderate the severity of the punishment imposed.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

The applicant's contentions were carefully considered.  However, any redress by this Board of the finality of a court-martial conviction is prohibited by law.  Therefore, there is no basis for granting the requested relief.  
  
BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___x___  ___x_____  ___x_____  DENY APPLICATION









BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      _______ _  x _______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100017224



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100017224



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150000814

    Original file (20150000814.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 20 August 2015 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20150000814 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). _______ _ _x______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090006947

    Original file (20090006947.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The orders show the general court-martial convening authority approved the sentence and directed that, except for the bad conduct discharge, the sentence be executed. The records of the FBI are under the jurisdiction of that agency and the Board does not have the authority to direct that they correct those records. While the applicant is correct that the findings of the drug charges should also include the final disposition of the charges on the FBI RAP sheet, the Board does not have the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140005046

    Original file (20140005046.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    BOARD DATE: 16 October 2014 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20140005046 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his military records by upgrading his bad conduct discharge. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004106242C070208

    Original file (2004106242C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    He was sentenced to a BCD, confinement at hard labor for 1 year, a reduction to the pay grade of E-1 and total forfeiture of pay. Accordingly, on 9 April 1985, the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 3, as a result of a duly reviewed and affirmed general court-martial conviction. As a result, the Board further determined that there is no evidence provided which shows that it would be in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140010668

    Original file (20140010668.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests his bad conduct discharge be upgraded to honorable. There is no evidence that he applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for an upgrade of his discharge within that board's 15-year statute of limitations. His conviction, confinement, and discharge were effected in accordance with applicable laws and regulations and his discharge appropriately characterized the misconduct for which he was convicted.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070017055

    Original file (20070017055.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his bad conduct discharge be upgraded so he can enlist to serve in Iraq. The applicant states, in effect, he wants his discharge upgraded to allow him to rejoin the military and serve in Iraq. In accordance with Title 10, United States Code, Section 1552, the authority under which this Board acts, the Army Board for Correction of Military Records is not empowered to set aside a conviction.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130019148

    Original file (20130019148.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. Article 71(c) having been complied with, and the sentence to confinement having been completed, that portion of the sentence pertaining to a bad conduct discharge was to be executed. Conviction and discharge were effected in accordance with...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130009733

    Original file (20130009733.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His DD Form 214 shows he was discharged as a result of court-martial in accordance with Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations) with a bad conduct discharge. There is no indication he petitioned the Army Discharge Review Board for a review of his discharge within that board's 15-year statute of limitations. Therefore, clemency in the form of an honorable or general discharge is not warranted in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140010290

    Original file (20140010290.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The evidence shows he was over 22 years of age at the time of his court-martial proceedings. There is no evidentiary basis for upgrading his bad conduct discharge to honorable or any other character of service. ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20140010290 3 ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 1 ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20140010290 2 ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 1

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120021189

    Original file (20120021189.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    BOARD DATE: 27 June 2013 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20120021189 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. On 18 February 1983, the applicant was dishonorably discharged from the Army. The conviction and discharge were effected in accordance with applicable laws and regulations and the discharge appropriately characterizes the misconduct for which he was convicted.