Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100016755
Original file (20100016755.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	    12 January 2011

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20100016755 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to reflect his appointment as a United States Army Reserve (USAR) captain and his completion of a bachelor's degree.

2.  The applicant states his DD Form 214 does not reflect his appointment as a USAR captain and his completion of a bachelor's degree.  Accordingly, he desires this administrative error corrected.

3.  The applicant provides a one-page letter explaining his application and listing his enclosures.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 24 July 1967.  He continued to serve through a series of continuous reenlistments and attained the rank of sergeant first class in 1974.

3.  On 21 May 1976, he accepted a USAR appointment as a warrant officer one (WO1) and entered active duty that date.  On 14 December 1977, he accepted a Regular Army appointment as a WO1.  He was promoted to the rank of chief warrant officer two (CW2) on 21 May 1978.  

4.  On 13 January 1981, he accepted a USAR appointment as a captain and continued to serve on active duty as a Regular Army warrant officer.  He was promoted to the rank of chief warrant officer three (CW3) on 1 November 1982.

5.  On 25 April 1987, he was conferred a Bachelor of Arts degree in Human Resource Administration by St. Leo University.

6.  On 31 July 1988, he was retired in the rank of CW3 and he was transferred to the Retired List effective 1 August 1988.  He completed 26 years and 7 days of active service.

7.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) serves as the authority for the preparation of the DD Form 214.  This regulation makes no provisions for entering civilian education or reserve appointments on the DD Form 214.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant was appointed as a USAR captain while serving on active duty as a Regular Army warrant officer and he completed a bachelor's degree prior to retiring from active duty.  However, there are no provisions in the applicable regulation that provide for the entry of those items of information on the DD Form 214.

2.  Accordingly, it appears his DD Form 214 was properly prepared in accordance with the applicable regulation and, in the absence of evidence to show otherwise, there appears to be no basis to grant his request.

3.  In order to justify correction of a military record, the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear that the record is in error or unjust.  The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy the aforementioned requirement.



BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X____  ___X___  ___X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1. The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.

2.  The Board wants the applicant and all others concerned to know that this action in no way diminishes the sacrifices made by him in service to the United States.  The applicant and all Americans should be justifiably proud of his service in arms.



      __________X_______________
                 CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100016755



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100016755



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110014420

    Original file (20110014420.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 31 May 2012 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20110014420 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests that his date of rank (DOR) for promotion to the rank of chief warrant officer four (CW4) be changed from 25 May 2007 to 22 June 2002. In the processing of this case a staff advisory opinion was obtained from the National Guard Bureau (NGB) which indicates that unless discharged from the USAR, a National Guard officer becomes a member of the USAR when...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1996 | 9605413C070209

    Original file (9605413C070209.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    APPLICANT STATES: In effect, that the aforementioned OER’s were rendered during his prior active service as a commissioned officer and the presence of them in his OMPF serves to create an unfair and unequal discriminator against him for promotion selection. When a soldier reenters the Army after a break in service, the old OMPF will be sent from the Army Reserve Personnel Center (ARPERCEN) to the appropriate OMPF custodian. DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040009791C070208

    Original file (20040009791C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Marla J. N. Troup | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. h. An unsigned 14 August 2000 memorandum requesting waiver of the educational requirements for appointment to the officer corps. The applicant was a Warrant Officer PA from August 1988; he was already in the PA program when the decision was made to transition Warrant Officer PA's to the officer corps.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100028027

    Original file (20100028027.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    e. He applied for appointment as a WO in MOS 973A again, was selected, and was appointed in October 1982. There is no evidence in the applicant's military personnel records that shows he was selected for appointment as a WO prior to 1982. The applicant contends his records should be corrected to show he was appointed as a USAR WO in the rank of WO1 in 1980 with corresponding adjustment of the effective dates of his promotions to CW2 and CW3 as a result of this correction because of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140012831

    Original file (20140012831.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides: * correspondence regarding his direct appointment as a commissioned officer in the U.S. Army Reserve * DD Form 214 * letter of appreciation with corresponding indorsements * college transcripts * letter regarding a student loan * three diplomas showing a bachelor of arts, a doctor of philosophy, and the successful completion of a postgraduate course * recommendation for work as a provider with Choice Behavioral Health Partnership * DA Form 1256 (Incentive Award...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002079077C070215

    Original file (2002079077C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, that he be advanced on the Retired List to the rank and pay grade of chief warrant officer three/W-3 (CW3/W-3). He served on active duty in an enlisted status for 9 years, 1 month, and 13 days, from 26 May 1972 to 9 July 1981, at which time he was honorably discharged, in the rank and pay grade of staff sergeant/E-6 (SSG/E-6), in order to accept a warrant officer appointment. The evidence of record reveals that the applicant was placed on the Retired List in...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070002575

    Original file (20070002575.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his discharge document be corrected to show his rank as chief warrant officer three (CW3)/pay grade W-3. The applicant's military service records contain a copy of a DD Form 214, with an effective date of 29 Jun 1971, which shows that he entered active service on 18 May 1970 and served as a USAR warrant officer in MOS 100B. Therefore, the evidence of record also shows that the applicant’s military service records correctly document his grade at the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100000045

    Original file (20100000045.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    In December 2008 the applicant submitted an application for appointment as a USAR Chaplain and requested appointment in the grade of Captain, pay grade O-3. The opinion did, however, note that the applicant requested and had the expectation that he would have been given a direct commission at the grade of Captain and recommended that his records be corrected to show his date of rank to Captain as 20 March 2009, the date of his initial appointment. As noted in the advisory opinion,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130014824

    Original file (20130014824.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests adjustment of his DA Form 5074-1-R (Record of Award of Entry Grade Credit (Health Services Officer)) to show his grade at appointment to be captain (CPT). The applicant states prior commissioned service not in the medical specialty is credited at one-half year for each year in accordance with Army Regulation 135-101 (Appointment of Reserve Commissioned Officers for Assignment to Army Medical Department Branches) and the Army National Guard (ARNG), Army Medical...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140020307

    Original file (20140020307.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his military records to show: a. he was promoted to chief warrant officer three (CW3) prior to retiring in 1977; b. his retirement adjusted to reflect this promotion and the benefits of such promotion; and c. he was originally promoted to specialist five (SP5), pay grade E-5, on 4 May 1959. The applicant contends that his military records should be corrected to show: a. he was promoted to chief warrant officer three (CW3) prior to his...