Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100016747
Original file (20100016747.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  11 January 2011

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20100016747 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any). 

THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show his service in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN).  He further requests correction to item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations, and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of his DD Form 214 to add any and all medals he earned while he was in the RVN to include the Bronze Star Medal.

2.  He states, in effect, his RVN service and awards were not listed on his DD Form 214 when he left the RVN and the U.S. Army.

3.  He provides no additional documents in support of this application.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.
2.  The applicant's records show he was inducted into the Army of the U.S. on 24 February 1971.

3.  His DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows:

* item 31 (Foreign Service) – Shows he arrived in the RVN on 24 August 1971
* item 38 (Record of Assignments) – Company A, 2nd Battalion, 327th Infantry Regiment from 5 September 1971 to 17 September 1971
* item 38 Company E, 2nd Battalion, 327th Infantry Regiment from 18 September 1971 to 13 April 1972
* item 38 – "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings
* item 39 (Campaigns) –unnamed
* item 41 (Awards and Decorations) National Defense Service Medal, Vietnam Service Medal (VSM), and Combat Infantryman Badge

4.  Item 41 (Awards and Decorations) of his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) does not show the Bronze Star Medal among his authorized awards.

5.  There are no orders in the applicant's personnel records awarding him the Bronze Star Medal.

6.  A review of the Awards and Decorations Computer-Assisted Retrieval System (ADCARS), an index of general orders issued during the Vietnam era between 1965 and 1973 maintained by the Military Awards Branch of the U.S. Army Human Resources Command, failed to reveal any orders for the Bronze Star Medal pertaining to the applicant.

7.  On 24 February 1971, he was honorably released from active duty and transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve Control Group (Annual Training).  He completed a total of 2 years of active service.  

8.  His DD Form 214 contains the following pertinent information:  

* item 22c (Foreign and/or Overseas Service) shows he served in the U.S. Army Pacific Command for 7 months and 20 days
* item 24 shows the National Defense Service Medal, VSM, and Marksman Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar (M-16)
* item 30 (Remarks) shows he served in the RVN from 24 August 1971 to 13 April 1972

9.  A review of his record indicates he is entitled to additional awards and decorations that are not shown on his DD Form 214.
10.  Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards), in effect at the time, provided that the Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM) was awarded to individuals who completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service.  This period was 3 years except in those cases when the period for the first award ended with the termination of a period of Federal military service.  The enlisted person must have had all "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings and no convictions by a court-martial.  Ratings of "unknown" for portions of the period under consideration were not disqualifying.

11.  Appendix B of Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) lists the campaigns for the Vietnam Conflict.  Based on the applicant's period of service in the RVN he participated in three campaigns:  the Consolidations I and II and the Vietnam Cease Fire campaigns.  This same regulation states that a bronze service star will be awarded for wear on the VSM for participation in each campaign.

12.  Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-3 (Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register) lists the awards received by units serving in Vietnam.  This pamphlet shows the unit to which the applicant was assigned was cited for award of the RVN Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation by Department of the Army General Orders Number 6, dated 1974, for the period 18 April to 31 August 1971.

13.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 states the Bronze Star Medal is awarded in time of war for heroism and for meritorious achievement or service.  As with all personal decorations, formal recommendations, approval through the chain of command, and announcement in orders are required.  

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The available evidence shows he served honorably from 24 February 1971 to 13 April 1972 and he received "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings throughout his tenure of service.  There is no evidence of any derogatory information in his record that would have disqualified him for award of the AGCM. Therefore, it would be appropriate to award the applicant the AGCM (1st Award) and correct his DD Form 214 to show this medal.

2.  General orders also show the unit to which the applicant was assigned was awarded the RVN Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation.  Therefore, he is entitled to correction of his DD Form 214 to show this unit award.

3.  Records show the applicant participated in three campaigns during his service in the RVN.  Therefore, he is eligible for award of three bronze service stars to be worn on his already-awarded VSM.

4.  His DD Form 214 clearly shows he served in the RVN during the period 24 August 1971 to 13 April 1972, for a total of 7 months and 20 days.  Therefore, there is no need for further correction to properly show his RVN service. 

5.  There is also no evidence available nor did the applicant provide any evidence that shows he is entitled to award of the BSM.  In the absence of such evidence, there is no basis to grant award of the BSM.

BOARD VOTE:

_______  _________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

____X___  ____X___  ___X____  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The Board determined the evidence presented is sufficient to warrant a recommendation for partial relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by:

	a.  awarding him the AGCM (1st Award) for the period 24 February 1971 to 13 April 1972;

	b.  deleting the VSM from his DD Form 214;

	c.  adding the AGCM (1st Award), VSM with three bronze service stars, and RVN Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation to item 24 of his DD Form 214; and

	d.  providing him a document to show the above corrections.







2.  The Board further determined the evidence presented is insufficient to warrant a portion of the requested relief.  As a result, the Board recommends denial of so much of the application that pertains to amending his DD Form 214 to show he is authorized the Bronze Star Medal and further correction of his RVN service.



      ____________X_____________
                 CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100016747



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2005 | 20050012592

    Original file (20050012592.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant’s Enlisted Qualification Record (DA Form 20) shows he served in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN) from 8 January 1971 through 19 December 1971. By regulation, in order to support award of the PH, there must be evidence that wound for which the award is being was received as a direct result of, or was caused by enemy action. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by awarding him the first award of the Army...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120001489

    Original file (20120001489.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states he would like to be awarded the PH for being wounded in action in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN) on 7 December 1967 as a result of a stepping on a punji stick for which he was treated in the RVN, and on 7 November 1970 as a result of receiving a gunshot wound to the back which resulted in his medical evacuation to the United States for treatment at Fort Polk, Louisiana. The applicant’s DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows, in item 31 (Foreign Service), that...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110008738

    Original file (20110008738.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His record contains orders showing he was awarded the AM (2nd through 5th Award). His records show he participated in three campaigns while serving in Vietnam. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the AGCM (First Award) for the period 8 February 1971 through 7 February 1974; b. deleting the VSM with one bronze service star from his DD Form 214; and c. adding the following to his DD Form 214: *...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110016716

    Original file (20110016716.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Awards), in effect at the time, stated the Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM) was awarded for each 3 years of continuous enlisted active Federal military service completed on or after 27 August 1940; for first award only, 1 year served entirely during the period 7 December 1941 to 2 March 1946; and, for the first award only, upon termination of service on or after 27 June 1950 of less than 3 years but more than 1 year. In light of his overall record of service, it would...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090005009

    Original file (20090005009.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 21 July 2009 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20090005009 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The evidence of record confirms the applicant was awarded the BSM for his meritorious service during the period November 1971 through May 1972, as evidenced by the BSM orders contained in his OMPF. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by amending item 24 of his DD Form 214, dated 25 May 1972, by...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080019606

    Original file (20080019606.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Paragraph 9-13 of the awards regulation contains guidance on award of the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960). The evidence of record confirms the applicant was awarded the BSM for his meritorious service during the period April 1971 through February 1972, as evidenced by the BSM orders contained in his OMPF.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140002863

    Original file (20140002863.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show he was awarded or authorized the Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM) and the Republic of Vietnam (RVN) Campaign Medal with Device (1960). His military records contain Headquarters, United States Army Vietnam, General Orders Number 3608, dated 10 June 1966, awarding him the ARCOM for meritorious service in the RVN. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150002357

    Original file (20150002357.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards), in effect at the time, provided that the AGCM was awarded to individuals who completed a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service. d. Based on the available evidence, it would be appropriate at this time to award the applicant the AGCM (1st Award) for the period 22 July 1970 through 24 January 1972. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150000161

    Original file (20150000161.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards), in effect at the time, provided that the AGCM was awarded to individuals who completed a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service. The evidence of record shows: a. DAGOs awarded the applicant's unit the – * Valorous Unit Award * RVN Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation (3rd Award) * RVN Civil Actions Honor Medal First Class Unit Citation b. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140005867

    Original file (20140005867.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards), in effect at the time, provided that the AGCM was awarded to individuals who completed a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service. The evidence of record shows: a. GOs awarded the applicant the PH; b. the applicant qualified for award of the VSM and he participated in three campaigns during his service in Vietnam. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a....