Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100016544
Original file (20100016544.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  21 December 2010

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20100016544 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, that his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be corrected to reflect that he completed his first full term of service.

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that because his records show that he was discharged 1 month before completing his first full term of service he is unable to use the Montgomery G.I. Bill (MGIB) benefits that he paid for.  He goes on to state that he was discharged for unsatisfactory performance because he failed his Army Physical Fitness Test (APFT) when he was only 1 month from completing his enlistment.  However, he has since served 18 months of active duty and he has served in Iraq.  He desires to have his records correctly so that he may use his benefits.

3.  The applicant provides copies of his two DD Form 214s.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 23 June 1993 for a period of 3 years.  He completed his basic training at Fort Jackson, South Carolina and his advanced individual training at Fort Bliss, Texas before being transferred to Fort Carson, Colorado for his first and only duty assignment.  He was advanced to the pay grade of E-4 on 1 September 1995.

3.  The facts and circumstances surrounding his administrative discharge are not present in the available records.  However, his records contain a duly authenticated DD Form 214 which shows that on 6 May 1996 he was honorably released from active duty (REFRAD) under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 13 for unsatisfactory performance.  He had served 2 years, 10 months and 14 days of total active service.

4.  On 13 July 2004, he enlisted in the Georgia Army National Guard (GAARNG) and on 6 December 2004 he was ordered to active duty in support of Operation Iraqi Freedom.  He deployed to Iraq/Kuwait on 17 May 2005 and on 26 June 2005 the applicant reenlisted for a period of 6 years and a $15,000 Selected Reserve Incentive Program (SRIP) bonus.  He departed Iraq on 19 April 2006 and on 1 June 2006 he was honorably REFRAD due to completion of required service.  He was subsequently promoted to the rank of sergeant in the GAARNG.

5.  On 16 March 2009, he was discharged under honorable conditions from the GAARNG in the pay grade of E-2 due to unsatisfactory participation. 

6.  Army Regulation 635-5 serves as the authority for the preparation of the DD Form 214.  It provides, in pertinent part, that the DD Form 214 will be prepared to reflect an individual’s service as of the date of release or discharge from active duty.  Changes that occur subsequent to the date of separation are not authorized to be entered on the DD Form 214 retroactively unless the event occurred during the period covered by the DD Form 214.i

7.  The MGIB is a benefits program designed to provide education benefits to eligible veterans and their families and is administered by the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA).

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust.  The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.

2.  In the absence of evidence to the contrary, it must be presumed that the applicant's administrative separation was accomplished in compliance with applicable regulations with no indication of procedural errors which would tend to jeopardize his rights.

3.  The applicant’s contentions have been noted; however, his DD Form 214 correctly reflects his service as of the date of his REFRAD and the desire to obtain benefits is not a sufficient basis to alter a properly-prepared Army record.

4.  In view of the foregoing, there appears to be no basis to grant the applicant’s request.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X____  ____X____  ____X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.


      _______ _   _X______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

---------------

------------------------------------------------------------



 

 

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100016544



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)	                                         AR20100016544



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080016669

    Original file (20080016669.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    It states, in pertinent part, that the source documents for entering information on the DD Form 214 will be the Enlisted Qualification Record, Officer Record Brief, enlistment/reenlistment documents, personnel finance records, discharge documents, separation orders, Military Personnel Records Jacket, or any other document authorized for filing in the Official Military Personnel File. The evidence of record also shows the SSN that was recorded on his DD Form 214 with an ending date of 7 May...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100020850

    Original file (20100020850.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show award of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB) and his contributions to the Montgomery GI Bill (MGIB). With respect to an entry regarding the MGIB on the DD Form 214, there is no provision in the regulation that governs the DD Form 214 to annotate an entry regarding the MGIB on this form.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090009367

    Original file (20090009367.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His DD Form 214 shows the applicant did not contribute to the VEAP. The applicant states his DD Form 214 shows he did not contribute to VEAP and does not indicate that he made any contributions to the MGIB. The applicant did not qualify for the VEAP and his DD Form 214 correctly shows he did not participate in the VEAP.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100022313

    Original file (20100022313.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, a. referral to the Physical Disability Evaluation System (PDES) for assessment by a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB); and b. review of his medical records by the Office of the Surgeon General (OTSG) prior to his 31 December 2006 retirement date to determine if he had any medical conditions as outlined in Army Regulation 40-501 (Standards of Medical Fitness), chapter 3, that may have determined him to be unfit for duty. He states he should have been medically...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140014088

    Original file (20140014088.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of her records to show entitlement to the $50,000.00 Student Loan Repayment Program (SLRP) incentive that she contracted for upon enlistment in the Army National Guard (ARNG). Records show the applicant enlisted in the ARNGUS/GAARNG (RFP in an ING status), on 30 June 2011, for a period of 1 year in MOS 12K and her enlistment agreement included the SLRP. The evidence of record also shows the NGB decision to deny the applicant's SLRP was based on her...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110000967

    Original file (20110000967.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show: * the Combat Infantryman Badge * the Combat Action Ribbon from the Marines 2. The applicant requests the Combat Infantryman Badge for his GAARNG service in Operation Iraqi Freedom and the Combat Action Ribbon for his USMC service in Operation Desert Storm, and states his combat during Operation Desert Storm is not reflected on his DD Form 214. There is no evidence of record...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040001647C070208

    Original file (20040001647C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be corrected to show his Reserve service, his foreign service, his home of record (HOR) as Pennsylvania; and his $600.00 additional Montgomery GI Bill deduction. Item 7b of his DD Form 214 for the period ending 14 February 2004 shows his HOR as ____ Oklahoma City, OK. As a result, the Board recommends that the DD Form 214 for the period ending 14 February 2004 of the individual...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100007016

    Original file (20100007016.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests that the Narrative Reason for Separation and Separation Code be removed from his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty). Accordingly, he was honorably discharged on 26 April 1993 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 5-13, due to a personality disorder.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100020424

    Original file (20100020424.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests correction to item 12f (Record of Service - Foreign Service) of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 7 February 2004 to show his overseas service in Iraq. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting from Item 12f of his DD Form 214 for...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130001001

    Original file (20130001001.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), for the period ending 11 June 2004, to show her home of record (HOR) as an Alabama (AL) address instead of P.O. When her mobilization period ended, she was issued orders that released her from active duty on 11 June 2004 and listed the place she entered active duty as Columbus, GA, and her HOR as Fort Gordon, GA. Therefore, without evidence to the contrary, it is...