Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100016409
Original file (20100016409.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  22 February 2011

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20100016409 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that his bad conduct discharge be upgraded to a discharge under other than honorable conditions.

2.  He states he made bad decisions when he was younger.  He is seeking a discharge upgrade so that he may obtain medical assistance from the Department of Veterans Affairs.  Currently, he is having problems with his knee, which requires surgery, and problems with his lower back from a surgery.  He states he has matured and asks forgiveness for his actions 21 years ago.

3.  He provides no additional evidence in support of this case.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  He enlisted in the Regular Army on 9 November 1984.  He successfully completed basic and advanced individual training and was awarded military occupational specialty 76V (Materiel Storage and Handling Specialist).

3.  On 28 October 1987, he was convicted in accordance with his pleas by a general court-martial of conspiracy to commit a robbery, committing a robbery with a firearm, and wrongfully possessing a firearm.  His approved sentence consisted of reduction to E-1, forfeiture of all pay and allowances, confinement for 2 years, and a bad conduct discharge.

4.  On 25 May 1988, the U.S. Army Court of Military Review considered his appeal and found that the findings and sentence were correct in law and fact and affirmed the findings and sentence.

5.  U.S. Army Correctional Activity, Fort Riley, KS, General Court-Martial Order Number 787, dated 25 September 1989, directed that his bad conduct discharge be executed.

6.  On 5 October 1989, he was separated from the Army with a bad conduct discharge under the provisions of chapter 3 of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations) as a result of conviction by court-martial.  He completed 3 years, 4 months, and 27 days of creditable active service with 545 days of lost time due to confinement.

7.  Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.  Paragraph 3-7c provides that a discharge under other than honorable conditions is an administrative separation from the service under conditions other than honorable.  It may be used for misconduct, fraudulent entry, homosexual conduct, security reasons, or in lieu of trial by court martial.

8.  In accordance with Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552, the authority under which this Board acts, the ABCMR is not empowered to set aside a conviction by a court-martial convened under the UCMJ.  Rather it is only empowered to change the severity of the sentence imposed in the court-martial process and then only if clemency is determined to be appropriate.  Clemency is an act of mercy or instance of leniency to moderate the severity of the punishment imposed.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The evidence of record confirms the applicant's trial by court-martial was warranted by the gravity of the offenses for which he was charged.  His conviction and discharge were effected in accordance with applicable law and regulations and the discharge appropriately characterizes the misconduct for which he was convicted.

2.  By law, the ABCMR may not disturb the finality of a court-martial.  The Board is only empowered to change a discharge if clemency is determined to be appropriate to moderate the severity of the punishment imposed.

3.  The applicant's entire record of service was considered in this case.  Given the seriousness of the offenses for which he was convicted, there is insufficient basis to warrant the relief requested.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X____  ____X____  ___X_____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _____________X____________
                 CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100016409



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100016409



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130019148

    Original file (20130019148.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. Article 71(c) having been complied with, and the sentence to confinement having been completed, that portion of the sentence pertaining to a bad conduct discharge was to be executed. Conviction and discharge were effected in accordance with...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150003203

    Original file (20150003203.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests an upgrade of his dishonorable discharge to general under honorable conditions. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110014641

    Original file (20110014641.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    When authorized, it is issued to a Soldier whose military record is satisfactory but not sufficiently meritorious to warrant an honorable discharge. Conviction and discharge were effected in accordance with applicable law and regulations, and the discharge appropriately characterizes the misconduct for which the applicant was convicted. Accordingly, his punishment was not disproportionate to the offenses for which he was convicted and he has failed to show sufficient evidence or reasons to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060006548C070205

    Original file (20060006548C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    In accordance with Title 10, United States Code, section 1552, the authority under which this Board acts, the Army Board for Correction of Military Records is not empowered to set aside a conviction. The punishment for robbery (Article 122) includes a Dishonorable Discharge or a Bad Conduct Discharge and confinement for 10 years. Based on the nature of the applicant's request, the Board also considered upgrading the applicant's discharge and assigning a corresponding RE Code that would...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130009733

    Original file (20130009733.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His DD Form 214 shows he was discharged as a result of court-martial in accordance with Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations) with a bad conduct discharge. There is no indication he petitioned the Army Discharge Review Board for a review of his discharge within that board's 15-year statute of limitations. Therefore, clemency in the form of an honorable or general discharge is not warranted in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120007976

    Original file (20120007976.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant did not provide any evidence. When authorized, it is issued to a soldier whose military record is satisfactory but not sufficiently meritorious to warrant an honorable discharge. Therefore, clemency in the form of an honorable discharge or a general discharge is not warranted in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110022990

    Original file (20110022990.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests an upgrade of his bad conduct discharge to general under honorable conditions. He was discharged from the Army on 13 April 2000 with a bad conduct character of service. The conviction and discharge were effected in accordance with applicable laws and regulations and the discharge appropriately characterizes the misconduct for which he was convicted.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110021979

    Original file (20110021979.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 5 June 2012 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20110021979 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The conviction and dishonorable discharge (not a bad conduct discharge) were effected in accordance with applicable laws and regulations and the discharge appropriately characterizes the misconduct for which he was convicted.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070000108

    Original file (20070000108.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) shows he was discharged under the provisions of chapter 11 of Army Regulation 645-200 (Separation of Enlisted Personnel) on 29 September 1972, with a bad conduct discharge as a result of court-martial. In accordance with Title 10, United States Code, section 1552, the authority under which this Board acts, the Army Board for Correction of Military Records is not empowered to set aside a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130008305

    Original file (20130008305.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He was issued a dishonorable discharge on 4 March 1988 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations – Enlisted Personnel), chapter 3, as a result of a court-martial. His record of service included one general court-martial conviction and 701 days of lost time. ___________X______________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.