Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100016355
Original file (20100016355.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  16 February 2011

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20100016355 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests change of his Separation Code from "LHJ" to "JDR" or comparable and change of his Reentry (RE) Code from "3" to "1" of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty).

2.  He states his noncommissioned officer (NCO) misled him into believing he was being released early without any penalty with an honorable discharge.  He states his DD Form 214 for the period ending 25 January 1995 indicates he was released due to "unsatisfactory performance," which was a shock to him.  He states that his service in Germany and Korea was exemplary.  When the
DD Form 214 was given to him to sign he only saw the word "Honorable" on the form and thought he was leaving the Army in good standing without any mark or blemish on his military record.  He adds in the future, he may wish to join the National Guard to fight for his country.

3.  He provides DD Forms 214 for the period ending 20 November 1992 and
25 January 1995.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 

3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant's military records are not available to the Board for review.  His records were apparently signed out at the time of this request.  However, this case is being considered using his DD Form 214 for the period ending
25 January 1995. 

3.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army (RA) on 1 August 1990 and he served through 20 November 1992.  His DD Form 214 for this period of service shows he was honorably released from active duty under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations - Enlisted Personnel), chapter 4, by reason of expiration of term of service.  He was issued an RE code of "1" and a separation code of "LBK."

4.  The applicant again enlisted in the RA on 5 October 1993.  On 25 January 1995, he was released from active duty after completing 1 year, 3 months,
21 days of creditable active service.  The DD Form 214 he was issued for this period of service shows in:

* item 24 (Character of Service) the entry "Honorable"
* item 25 (Separation Authority) the entry "AR 635-200, Chapter 13"
* item 26 (Separation Code) the entry "LHJ"
* item 27 (Reentry Code) entry "3"
* item 28 (Narrative Reason for Separation) the entry "Unsatisfactory Performance"

5.  Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the requirements and procedures for administrative discharge of enlisted personnel.  Chapter 13 of this regulation, in effect at the time, provides for separation due to unsatisfactory performance when in the commander’s judgment the individual will not become a satisfactory Soldier; retention will have an adverse impact on military discipline, good order and morale; the service member will be a disruptive influence in the future; the basis for separation will continue or recur; and/or the ability of the service member to perform effectively in the future, including potential for advancement or leadership, is unlikely.  Service of Soldiers separated because of unsatisfactory performance 

under this regulation will be characterized as honorable or under honorable conditions.

6.  Army Regulation 635-200 further states, in pertinent part, that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes based on their service records or the reason for discharge.  Army Regulation 601-210 (Active and Reserve Components Enlistment Program), covers eligibility criteria, policies, and procedures for enlistment and processing into the Regular Army (RA) and the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR).  Table 3-1 included a list of the RA RE codes:

	a.  RE-1 applies to Soldiers completing their term of active service who are considered qualified to reenter the U.S. Army.  They are qualified for enlistment if all other criteria are met.

	b.  RE-3 applies to Soldiers who are not considered fully qualified for reentry or continuous service at time of separation, but disqualification is waivable.  They are ineligible unless a waiver is granted.

7.  Army Regulation 635-5-1 (Separation Program Designator (SPD) Codes) provides the specific authorities (regulatory or directive), reasons for separating Soldiers from active duty, and the SPD codes to be entered on the DD Form 214. It states, in pertinent part, that the SPD code of "LHJ" is the appropriate code to assign to Soldiers separated under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 13, by reason of unsatisfactory performance.  The SPD/RE Code Cross Reference Table indicates that RE-3 is the proper code to assign members separated with an SPD of "LHJ."

8.  Recruiting personnel have the responsibility for initially determining whether an individual meets current enlistment criteria.  They are required to process a request for waiver under the provisions of Army Regulation 601-210, chapter 4.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contention that the separation code and RE code on his DD Form 214 for the period ending 25 January 1995 should be changed was carefully considered.  Evidence of record shows he was involuntarily released from active duty for unsatisfactory performance.  By regulation, this mandated an assignment of an SPD code of "LHJ" and a corresponding RE code of "3."

2.  Lacking independent evidence to the contrary, it is presumed that all requirements of law and regulation were met and his rights were fully protected 

throughout the separation process.  Based on the authority and reason for his separation, he was properly assigned the SPD code of "LHJ" and the RE code of "3."  There is no evidence of an error or injustice related to the entries in question; therefore, they were valid at the time of his separation and remain valid today.  No other SPD or RE code would be appropriate in this case.

3.  The ABCMR does not correct records solely for the purpose of establishing eligibility for other programs or benefits.  The applicant is advised that if he desires to reenter military service, he should contact a local recruiter who can best advise him on his eligibility for returning to military service.  Those individuals can best advise a former service member as to the needs of the service at the time and are responsible for processing RE code waivers.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X____  ___X_____  ___X_____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      ___________X____________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100016355



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100016355



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120020366

    Original file (20120020366.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides: * page 1 of a DD Form 4 (Enlistment/Reenlistment Document), dated 19 November 1988 * a Western Union Mailgram from the U.S. Army Reserve Personnel Center (ARPERCEN), St. Louis, MO, dated 21 January 1991 * a U.S. Army Individual Ready Reserve recognition certificate in support of Operation Desert Storm * his U.S. Army Honorable Discharge Certificate, dated 5 February 1991 * his DD Form 214 for the period ending 5 February 1991 * a DARP Form 249-2-E (Chronological...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070008243C080407

    Original file (20070008243C080407.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Michael J. Flynn | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant's Personnel Qualification Record (DA Form 2-1), which was prepared upon his entry on 10 October 1989, upon his entry on active duty, lists his SSAN using the number 5 in the fifth digit in Item 2 (SSN). Army Regulation 635-5-1 (SPD Codes) provides the specific authorities (regulatory or directive), reasons for separating Soldiers from...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002068930C070402

    Original file (2002068930C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. The applicant completed a separation physical and was found qualified for separation. On 16 June 1995, the applicant’s commander initiated action to separate him under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 13, for unsatisfactory performance for failing to pass two record APFTs.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100001024

    Original file (20100001024.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction to items 4a (Grade, Rate or Rank), 4b (Pay Grade), 7 (Last Duty Assignment and Major Command), 13 (Decorations, Medals, Ribbons, Badges, Citations, and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized), 21 (Signature of Member Being Separated), 24 (Character of Service), 25 (Separation Authority), 26 (Separation Code), 27 (Reenlistment Code (RE)), 28 (Narrative Reason for Separation), and 30 (Member Requests Copy 4) of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004105362C070208

    Original file (2004105362C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Powers | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. A separation code of "LHJ" applies to RA Soldiers separated for unsatisfactory performance under the provisions of chapter 13, AR 635-200. Records show the applicant should have discovered the alleged injustice now under consideration on 13 September 1992; therefore, the time for the applicant to file a request for correction of any error or injustice expired on 12...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100024794

    Original file (20100024794.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests that the authority for his separation be changed from Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations – Enlisted Personnel), chapter 13, for unsatisfactory performance to a separation code that will allow him to enlist in the active military. However, his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) shows he was administratively separated on 20 January 1995 under the provisions of Army...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090012121

    Original file (20090012121.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that items 26 (Separation Code), 27 (Reentry Code), and 28 (Narrative Reason for Separation) on his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be changed. The regulation, in effect at the time, stated the reason for discharge based on separation code "LHJ" is "Unsatisfactory Performance" and the regulatory authority is Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 13. Pertinent Army regulations provide that prior to discharge or release from active duty,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100023504

    Original file (20100023504.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    During its original review of the case, the Board determined there was insufficient evidence to warrant correction of items 4a, 4b, 21, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, and 30, and accordingly denied his request. Chapter 13 of Army Regulation 635-200 (Active Duty Enlisted Administrative Separations) provides for separation due to unsatisfactory performance when, in the commander's judgment, the individual will not become a satisfactory Soldier; retention will have an adverse impact on military...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130017479

    Original file (20130017479.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show the entry in item 28 (Narrative Reason for Separation) as something other than "unsatisfactory performance." There is no indication he petitioned the Army Discharge Review Board for an upgrade of his discharge within that board's 15-year statute of limitations. Accordingly, his immediate commander initiated separation action against him for unsatisfactory performance.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 04106644C070208

    Original file (04106644C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The reason for separation was recorded as “expiration of service obligation.” Although the applicant indicated in his application to the Board that he was a current member of the Army National Guard, there was no new enlistment contract in records available to the Board. Pertinent Army regulations provide that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE Codes, based on their service records or the...