IN THE CASE OF:
BOARD DATE: 20 January 2011
DOCKET NUMBER: AR20100015999
THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:
1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).
2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) for the period ending 9 May 1968 to list all awards and decorations earned for his service in the Republic of Korea. In addition, he requests item 22c (Foreign and or Sea Service) on his DD Form 214 be corrected to show his service in the Republic of Korea.
2. The applicant states, in effect, that his DD Form 214 should be corrected to reflect his service in the Republic of Korea and all of the awards he is entitled to receive.
3. The applicant provides no additional documentation in support of this case.
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicants failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicants failure to timely file. In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.
2. The applicant was inducted into the Army of the United States on 10 May 1966 and successfully completed basic training and advanced individual training. He was awarded military occupational specialty 95B (Military Policeman).
3. He arrived in the Republic of Korea and was assigned to the 55th Military Police Company on 4 October 1966. He departed the Republic of Korea on 29 October 1967.
4. On 9 May 1968, he was honorably released from active duty in the rank of specialist four (SP4)/E-4 after completing 2 years of creditable active service. Item 22c of his DD Form 214, dated 9 May 1968, shows the entry "0" years "0" months and "0" days.
5. His DD Form 214 shows he was awarded:
* National Defense Service Medal
* Marksman Marksmanship Qualification Badge (Pistol)
* Marksman Marksmanship Qualification Badge (Rifle)
6. A DD Form 215 (Correction to DD Form 214), dated 30 October 1984, was issued to the applicant which amended item 22c of his DD Form 214 by adding the U.S. Army Pacific Command (USARPAC), 1 year, 0 months, and 25 days.
7. There is no evidence the applicant received the first award of the Army Good Conduct Medal. His records do not contain any adverse information and his DA Form 20 shows his conduct and efficiency ratings were "excellent" throughout his period of service.
8. Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards), in effect at the time, provided policy and criteria concerning individual military decorations. It stated that the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded for each 3 years of continuous enlisted active Federal military service completed on or after 27 August 1940 and, for the first award only, upon termination of service on or after 27 June 1950 of less than 3 years but more than 1 year. At the time, a Soldier's conduct and efficiency ratings must have been rated as "excellent" for the entire period of qualifying service.
9. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal is authorized for qualifying service after 1 July 1958 in military operations within a specific geographic area during a specified time period. An individual, who was not engaged in actual combat or equally hazardous activity, must have been a bona fide member of a unit participating in, or be engaged in the direct support of, the operation for 30 consecutive or
60 nonconsecutive days provided this support involved entering the area of operations. Qualifying service for this award includes service in the Republic of Korea from 1 October 1966 through 30 June 1974.
10. Army Regulation 600-8-22 states that the Korea Defense Service Medal is authorized for award to members of the Armed Forces of the United States who have served on active duty in support of the defense of the Republic of Korea. The period of eligibility is 28 July 1954 to a date to be determined by the Secretary of Defense.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. The applicant was separated in the rank of SP4 with 2 years of creditable active service with no time lost and conduct and efficiency ratings of "excellent" throughout his period of service. Therefore, it appears he met the eligibility criteria for award of the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for the period
10 May 1966 through 9 May 1968. He should be awarded the Army Good Conduct Medal and it should be added to his DD Form 214 for the period ending 9 May 1968.
2. He met the eligibility criteria for award of the Korea Defense Service Medal and the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal. These awards should be added to his DD Form 214.
3. A DD Form 215, dated 30 October 1984, amended the above DD Form
214 for the period ending 9 May 1968 by adding in item 22c the entry U.S. Army Pacific Command (USARPAC), 1 year, 0 months, and 25 days. A copy of the document will be provided to the applicant for his records.
BOARD VOTE:
____X____ ___X_____ ___X_____ GRANT FULL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by:
a. awarding the applicant the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for the period 10 May 1966 through 9 May 1968;
b. amending item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations, and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of his DD Form 214 by adding the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award), the Korea Defense Service Medal, and the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal; and
c. providing the applicant a copy of the DD Form 215 (Correction to DD Form 214), dated 30 October 1984.
_______ _ _X______ ___
CHAIRPERSON
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20100015999
3
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20100015999
2
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080014284
The applicant states, in effect, that he was born in Middlebury, Vermont, not Middleburg; that the entry "USARPAC" [U.S. Army Pacific Command] in item 22c on his DD Form 214 should be Korea; and that he is eligible for the Korea Defense Service Medal (KDSM). The regulation, in effect at the time, provided that the total active duty outside the continental limits of the United States for the period covered by the DD Form 214 and the last overseas theater in which the service was performed...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130019315
While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file. The evidence of record shows he received one bronze service star. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090021140
This medal is awarded to all members of the Armed Forces of the United States for qualifying service in Vietnam after 3 July 1965 through 28 March 1973. This document shows the unit to which the applicant was assigned was awarded the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation by Department of the Army General Orders 43, dated 1970. f. Army Regulation 600-8-22 states the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal is authorized for qualifying service after 1 July 1958 in military...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110013049
The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Korea Defense Service Medal and the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal for his service in Korea. Qualifying service for this award includes service in Korea from 1 October 1966 to 30 June 1974; and b. Korea Defense Service Medal is authorized for award to members of the Armed Forces of the United States who have served on active duty in support of the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130004794
The applicant indicated on his application that he is providing a certificate out of his Army records that shows the dates of his service in Vietnam. The regulation in effect at the time of the applicant's separation specified that item 22c of the DD Form 214 would contain the total amount of active duty served outside the continental limits of the United States during the period covered by the DD Form 214 and the last overseas theater in which the service was performed (e.g., USARPAC). As...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090018007
The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) for the period ending on 7 July 1972 to show his service in Vietnam and all appropriate awards associated with this service. The applicant states that he served in Vietnam from June 1969 to June 1970, but there is no indication of this service on his DD Form 214 or any awards associated with this service. The applicant contends that his DD Form 214 should be corrected to...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090011799
The applicant provides his DD Form 214 in support of his application. Therefore, it would be appropriate to add these awards to his record and DD Form 214 at this time. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. adding to item 22c the entry "Foreign and/or Sea Service (USARPAC-RVN)"; b. deleting from item 24 of his DD Form 214 the Vietnam Service Medal; c. adding to item 24 of his DD Form 214 the Armed Forces...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040001945C070208
The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his separation document (DD Form 214) by including all awards to which he is entitled and by documenting his overseas service in Vietnam, Korea and Okinawa. The separation documents regulation in effect at the time specified that the Item 24 entry would include all awards awarded or authorized as taken from the Enlisted Qualification Record (DA Form 20). Item 24 of the applicant’s DD Form 214, as amended in the two DD Forms 215 he was...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100016863
With respect to his foreign service, the evidence of record shows he served in USARPAC, Korea, from 26 March 1968 to 23 November 1968. Item 26a of his DD Form 214 only shows one period of AWOL (86 days, from 2 May to 28 July 1967). As a result, the Board recommends denial of so much of the application that pertains to: * Type of Certificate Issued and the issuance of a certificate * Showing a communications military occupational specialty * Service as a member of a Quick Reaction Force *...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120006528
The applicant states there is no record on file of him serving in these countries except the records he provides with this application. Qualifying service for this award includes service in Korea from 1 October 1966 to 30 June 1974. d. The Korea Defense Service Medal is authorized for award to members of the Armed Forces of the United States who served on active duty in support of the defense of the Republic of Korea. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army...