Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100015959
Original file (20100015959.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
 
		IN THE CASE OF:	

		BOARD DATE:	29 December 2010

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20100015959 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that his status be reviewed and, if he is qualified,
he be issued a 15-year letter pertaining to retirement eligibility.

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that he:

* was reassigned from the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) Control Group (Reinforcement) to the Retired Reserve  
* He has not been discharged or provided notice of eligibility for retired pay
* He realizes he is not qualified for a 20-year retirement from the Army Reserve
* He contacted the Army Human Resources Command (HRC) and it was suggested that he continue to remain in the Retired Reserve past age 60
* On 10 May 2010, he received an undated, unsigned letter from HRC which states their system shows he has 16 qualifying years, and without a   15-year letter he would not qualify for retirement pay
* The sender provided a DD Form 149 for him to request a 15-year letter from the Army Review Boards Agency 
* Additionally, the letter states, in effect, that if he received the 15-year letter he can apply for retirement pay.

3.  The applicant provides copies of:

* Orders C-03-908423, U.S. Army Reserve Personnel Command, dated    16 March 99, reassigning applicant from the USAR Control Group (Reinforcement) to the Retired Reserve, effective 18 March 1999
* A chronological statement of retirement points, HRC, St. Louis, MO  
* A copy of an undated, unsigned letter the applicant claims he received from HRC 

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  On 30 July 1970, the applicant was commissioned a second lieutenant in the USAR.  

2.  The applicant served in various positions in the Ready Reserve until he was reassigned to the Retired Reserve effective 18 March 1999.

3.  The applicant received a letter from the U.S. Army Reserve Personnel Command, dated 31 January 1998, that advised him that he was about to attain maximum years of service.  He was offered discharge or transfer to the Retired Reserve.  He chose transfer to the Retired Reserve. 

4.  Orders C-03-908423, U.S. Army Reserve Personnel Command, dated         16 March 99, were issued reassigning applicant from the USAR Control Group (Reinforcement) to the Retired Reserve, effective 18 March 1999.  The reason stated in the orders is:  completion of maximum authorized years of service.  His statement of retirement points shows he earned 16 qualifying years of retirement as of retirement year ending 17 March 1999.

5.  Title 10 of the U.S. Code (USC), section 10143 indicates that the Selected Reserve is comprised of Troop Program Units (TPUs), Active Guard Reserve (AGR) Soldiers, and Individual Mobilization Augmentees (IMAs).

6.  Title 10, USC, section 12731 provides the legal authority for age and service requirements for non-regular service retired pay.  It states, in pertinent part, that members are entitled to retired pay when they are at least 60 years of age and have performed at least 20 years of qualifying service.  

7.  Title 10, USC, section 12731a, was a temporary special retirement qualification authority.  It provided that, during the period beginning 23 October 1992 through 30 September 1999 (later extended to 31 December 2001), a member of the Selected Reserve who had completed at least 15, and less than 20 years of qualifying service as of 1 October 1991 could, upon the request of the member, be transferred to the Retired Reserve.  It was offered to any Selected Reserve member who lost his or her paid drill position due to inactivation, relocation, or reorganization of his or her unit during the drawdown period.  It did not include members discharged or transferred because they no longer met qualifications for membership.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends he should have received a 15-letter to receive non-regular service retired pay at age 60.

2.  The temporary retirement authority was meant to be a drawdown tool to provide a reduced retirement to Selected Reservists who lost their paid positions due to unit inactivation, relocation, or reorganization and was not meant for members who were already scheduled to leave the Selected Reserve for other reasons.

3.  The applicant was assigned to the USAR Control Group (Reinforcement), not the Selected Reserve.  Therefore, he was not authorized a 15-year letter for non-regular service retired pay at age 60.

4.  In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's requested relief.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__X_____  ___X____  ____X___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      __________X______________
                 CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100010203



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100015959



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100010203

    Original file (20100010203.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 6 June 1997, HRC notified the applicant he had not been selected for promotion for a second time and that he must be discharged or transferred to the Retired Reserve. On 1 March 1998, the applicant was transferred to the Retired Reserve. It provided that, during the period beginning 23 October 1992 through 30 September 1999 (later extended to 31 December 2001), a member of the Selected Reserve who had completed at least 15, and less than 20 years of qualifying service as of 1 October...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100010201

    Original file (20100010201.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant was transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve and was promoted to CW3 effective 30 September 1992. It provided that, during the period beginning 23 October 1992 through 30 September 1999 (later extended to 31 December 2001), a member of the Selected Reserve who had completed at least 15, and less than 20 years of qualifying service as of 1 October 1991 could, upon the request of the member, be transferred to the Retired Reserve. Paragraph 4-4a provided, in pertinent part, that...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120017853

    Original file (20120017853.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states he was told by the 102nd U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) Command that he would be retired from the USAR due to unit inactivation with entitlement to pay and benefits at age 60. The applicant provides Orders 117-018 transferring him to the Retired Reserve. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: * Showing he was eligible for retired pay at age 60 * Showing his application for retired pay at age 60...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130008198

    Original file (20130008198.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states: * he was released from service in 1991 and early retirement was not offered; he was ultimately discharged in 2005 but he was not aware of the 15-year letter * he did not request to be removed from the Active Guard Reserve (AGR) and he has several letters from commanding officers not to remove him from the AGR * he was released from active duty in 1993 due to downsizing and he was placed in the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) Control Group (Reinforcement) with 18 years of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130019457

    Original file (20130019457.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Through his Member of Congress, the applicant states: * he is asking for reconsideration of a previous ABCMR decision because the evidence he previously presented was misinterpreted * when he first appealed to the ABCMR, his application received an incorrect advisory opinion from an official in the Retired Pay Branch at the U.S. Army Human Resources Command (HRC) * this official provided an advisory opinion full of false statements, as shown by both previous and newly-submitted evidence * he...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070011054

    Original file (20070011054.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    This official stated that based on the applicant's Chronological Statement of Retirement Points, only 19 years of qualifying service for retired pay could be verified and therefore, her request for retired pay was denied. However, TERA provisions of the law in effect at the time of the applicant's transfer to the Retired Reserve provided for granting non-regular retirement at age 60 eligibility to those members of the Reserve who had completed 15 but less than 20 years of qualifying service...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001056350C070420

    Original file (2001056350C070420.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    APPLICANT STATES : The applicant states that he should receive SSP based on his removal on 25 February 1994 from a deleted Individual Mobilization Augmentation (IMA) position because of the revision of the Mobilization (MOB) TDA/TOE. The applicant did request transfer to the Retired Reserve and his request was granted; however, that transfer took place 7 months after he had secured attachment to ARPERCEN to drill for points, and 5 months after his reassignment from the IMA position at Fort...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050007213C070206

    Original file (20050007213C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Rea Nuppenau | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant provides two AHRC Forms 249-2-E (Chronological Statement of Retirement Points); her Retirement Points Accounting System Statement; a copy of ARPERCEN, Orders C-03-410376A01 dated 14 September 1995; a copy of ARPERCEN, Orders C-03-410376 dated 15 March 1994; reassignment orders dated 9 January 1992; her notification of eligibility for retired pay at...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060002076C070205

    Original file (20060002076C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    In pertinent part, it states that, normally, officers having 18 or 19 years of qualifying Federal service for retired pay will not be removed without their consent; however, this policy does not apply to officers transferred or discharged for reaching the maximum age at which transfer to the Retired Reserve or discharge is required by law. Such officer may not be retained in an active status under this section later than the date on which the officer becomes 67 years of age (68 years of age...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120006724

    Original file (20120006724.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Subsequent orders issued to correct the initial orders are either in error or were not placed in his personnel record. Orders R118-01, dated 28 April 1999, show Orders 256-26 (dated 13 September 1997) were amended to show he was assigned to the USAR Control Group (Retired Reserve). Evidence shows on 21 June 1997, having completed 15 years of qualifying service for retired pay, the applicant applied for early qualification for retired pay and transfer to the Retired Reserve due to the...