IN THE CASE OF:
BOARD DATE: 13 January 2011
DOCKET NUMBER: AR20100015624
THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:
1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).
2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) and retirement orders to show he was promoted to the rank/grade of staff sergeant (SSG)/E-6 at the time of his disability retirement.
2. The applicant states he was in a promotable status at the time of his retirement and he should have been promoted.
3. The applicant provides copies of his DD Form 214; DA Form 3355 (Promotion Point Worksheet), dated 7 September 2007; and Military Personnel (MILPER) Message Number 09-067, issued on 25 March 2009.
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant's DD Form 214 shows:
a. he enlisted in the Regular Army on 20 October 2000;
b. he was promoted to sergeant (SGT)/E-5, effective 1 February 2005; and
c. he was retired on 3 April 2009 due to temporary physical disability.
2. The DA Form 3355 provided by the applicant indicates:
a. his company commander recommended him for promotion to SSG/E-6 on 7 September 2007;
b. the applicant attained 647 points out of a possible 800 points;
c. he was recommended for promotion by the board, and
d. the promotion authority approved the recommendation on 10 September 2007.
3. The MILPER Message provided by the applicant states that Soldiers who are on a promotion list at the time of retirement for disability will be retired for disability at the promotion list grade. It further states that such promotion is to be effective the day before placement on the retired list.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. The applicant contends that he should have been retired as a staff sergeant, pay grade E-6 because he held promotion status at the time of his disability retirement.
2. The available evidence clearly shows that the applicant was recommended for promotion to SSG/E-6 in September 2007. However, it does not show he was integrated onto a valid promotion standing list. Furthermore, there is no evidence showing he was still in a promotable status at the time of his disability retirement in 2009.
3. Should the applicant have, or be able to obtain, copies of a promotion standing list or other substantiating evidence showing he was fully qualified for promotion at the time of his disability retirement, he may submit such documentation for consideration.
4. In view of the foregoing, there is insufficient evidence with which to grant the applicant's requested relief.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT FULL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
____X___ ___X____ ____X___ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.
_______ X _______ ___
CHAIRPERSON
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20100015624
3
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20100015624
3
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140005035
The applicant provides: * Self-authored statement * DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) * Orders 038-0022, dated 7 February 2006 * DA Form 2166 (Noncommissioned Officer Evaluation Report (NCOER)) * Enlisted Record Brief (ERB), dated 25 January 2006 * Military Personnel (MILPER) Message Number 13-106 * Course Reservation Verification, dated 9 March 2006 CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. As stated above, the commander is required to counsel Soldiers who are fully...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130003382
c. When Military Personnel (MILPER) Message Number 08-033, subject: (Updated) AAA-294 Enlisted Promotion Report Automatic List Integration Section for Staff Sergeant) was issued on 1 February 2008, he was never informed of its provisions and he was not aware of any action by the U.S. Army Human Resources Command (HRC) to put him on the standing list for promotion to SSG/E-6. The company commander, first sergeant, and the battalion command sergeant major formed negative opinions of him...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140002288
The applicant requests correction of his military records to show he was promoted to staff sergeant (SSG) with a date of rank (DOR) of 1 June 2011. The message states, in part, Brigade/Battalion S-1 and Unit HR Specialists will assist Soldiers with updating their personnel records through the electronic Military Personnel Office (eMILPO) system and update training records through the S3/G3 Army Training Requirements and Resources System (ATTRS) Representative. His request did not warrant a...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120014904
The applicant requests: * correction of his Enlisted Record Brief (ERB) to reflect the correct date and number of promotion points to sergeant (SGT)/E-5 * retroactive promotion to SGT/E-5 with a date of rank (DOR) and effective date of 1 June 2011 2. However, as of 1 May 2011, the applicant was recorded as having 562 promotion points. Therefore, he cannot be promoted.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120005721
He states: a. he turned in his promotion documents on 7 April 2011 assuming he had until the normal monthly deadline of 8 April 2011. b. he was not informed by S-1 that he had to have his record updated by 5 April 2011 for validation for the 1 May 2011 promotion board. b. the timeline for the DA Form 3355 (Promotion Point Worksheet) shutdown on 6 April 2011 was announced via MILPER (Military Personnel) Message 11-084, S-1 Net, and the Army Times. He contends he was not informed by the S-1...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140015534
IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 28 April 2015 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20140015534 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests, in effect, placement on the temporary disability retired list (TDRL) in the rank/grade of sergeant first class (SFC)/E-7 vice staff sergeant (SSG)/E-6. The BNCOC Phase I distance learning program was transformed into Advanced Leader Course (ALC) - CC delivered via blackboard starting on 1 October 2009.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100015646
The applicant's records show he enlisted in the Regular Army (RA) on 17 September 2002 and he held military occupational specialty (MOS) 63B (Wheeled Vehicle Mechanic). The evidence of record shows he was recommended for promotion to SGT by a battalion promotion board. However, since he was in a promotable status and on a valid promotion list at the time of retirement for disability, he was entitled to retirement at the promotion list grade, effective the date before placement on the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130012279
He provided a memorandum from the 191st CSSB, dated 27 December 2012, subject: Promotion Board Proceedings for Promotion to SGT and SSG, recommending the applicant for promotion to SGT. HRC memorandum for U.S. Army Promotion Work Centers, dated 22 February 2013, subject: Department of the Army Promotion Point Cutoff Scores for 1 March 2013 and Junior Enlisted Issues, announcing promotion point cutoff scores for 1 March 2013. a. He provided a copy of his email to HRC, dated 3 June 2013,...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130011041
g. His recruiter told him he had to ship from Germany and he could keep an eye on him and that based on the orders so would his family. c. Records indicate the applicant was recommended for promotion to SGT in MOS 68Q by a promotion board in August 2010 and again in August 2011. The evidence shows he was promoted to SGT on 1 August 2012 in the USAR in MOS 68Q and he enlisted in the RA on 27 November 2012 for MOS 68Q.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090008229
The applicant provides a copy of his enlistment contract, his DA Form 3355 (Promotion Point Worksheet), and his vocational school transcript in support of his application. In a 30 April 2010 electronic mail message the applicant stated the following: * request reevaluation of the papers he submitted * he was accepted into the active Army under the ACASP * his enlistment contract shows the school was accredited; therefore, he was awarded the MOS 13. However, the evidence of record shows the...