Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100015493
Original file (20100015493.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		
		BOARD DATE:	  30 November 2010

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20100015493 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his records to show award of the Combat Medical Badge and Air Medal.

2.  The applicant states he held military occupational specialty (MOS) 91B (Combat Medic) and served as an infantry combat medic with B Company, 1st Battalion, 501st Infantry, in Vietnam.  His record does not seem to contain his activity in which he participated in numerous combat assaults and many ambushes as a front line medic.  He was assigned to care for 33 people.  He also wants his Air Medal. 

3.  The applicant did not provide any evidence. 

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.
2.  The applicant's records show he was inducted into the Army of the United States on 22 January 1971 and held MOS 91A (Medical Corpsman).  He served in Vietnam from 28 August 1971 to 13 April 1972.  He was assigned to Headquarters and Headquarters Company, 1st Battalion, 501st Infantry.

3.  He was honorably released from active duty on 14 April 1972 and he was transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve Control Group to complete his remaining service obligation.

4.  Item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) shows the National Defense Service Medal, Vietnam Service Medal, Vietnam Campaign Medal, and an overseas service bar.

5.  His service records do not contain orders awarding him the Combat Medical Badge and/or the Air Medal.  

6.  During the processing of this case, a member for the Board staff reviewed the Awards and Decorations Computer Assisted Retrieval System maintained by the Military Awards Branch of the United States Army Human Resources Command, which is an index of general orders issued during the Vietnam era between 1965 and 1973.  This review failed to reveal any the Combat Medical Badge or Air Medal orders on file for the applicant.

7.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the Combat Medical Badge is awarded to medical department personnel (colonel and below) who are assigned or attached to a medical unit of company or smaller size that is organic to an infantry unit of brigade, regimental or smaller size which is engaged in active ground combat.  Battle participation credit is not sufficient; the infantry unit must have been in contact with the enemy and the Soldier must have been personally present and under fire during such ground combat.

8.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 provides, in pertinent part, that the Air Medal is awarded in time of war for heroism and for meritorious achievement or service while participating in aerial flight.  This award is primarily intended for personnel on flying status, but may also be awarded to those personnel whose combat duties require them to fly, for example personnel in the attack elements of units involved in air-land assaults against an armed enemy.  As with all personal decorations, formal recommendations, approval through the chain of command, and announcement in orders are required.

9.  U.S. Army Vietnam (USARV) Regulation 672-1 (Decorations and Awards) provided, in pertinent part, guidelines for award of the Air Medal.  It established that passenger personnel who did not participate in an air assault were not eligible for the award based upon sustained operations.  It defined terms and provided guidelines for the award based upon the number and types of missions or hours.  Twenty-five Category I missions (air assault and equally dangerous missions) and accrual of a minimum of 25 hours of flight time while engaged in Category I missions was the standard established for which sustained operations were deemed worthy of recognition by an award of the Air Medal.  However, the regulation was clear that these guidelines were considered only a departure point.  

10.  Title 10 of the U.S. Code, section 1130 (10 USC 1130) provides the legal authority for consideration of proposals for decorations not previously submitted in a timely fashion.  Upon the request of a Member of Congress, the Secretary concerned shall review a proposal for the award of or upgrading of a decoration.  Based upon such review, the Secretary shall determine the merits of approving the award.  

11.  The request, with a DA Form 638 (Recommendation for Award), must be submitted through a Member of Congress to:  Commander, U.S. Army Human Resources Command, ATTN:  AHRC-PDP-A, 1600 Spearhead Division Avenue, Fort Knox, KY 40122.  The unit must be clearly identified, along with the period of assignment and the recommended award.  A narrative of the actions or period for which recognition is being requested must accompany the DA Form 638.  Requests should be supported by sworn affidavits, eyewitness statements, certificates, and related documents.  Supporting evidence is best provided by commanders, leaders, and fellow Soldiers who had personal knowledge of the facts relative to the request.  The burden and costs for researching and assembling supporting documentation rest with the applicant.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  With respect to the Combat Medical Badge, the applicant's medical MOS and his service in Vietnam with an infantry unit are not in question.  However, there is no evidence in the available records and he did not submit sufficient evidence that shows he was personally present and under fire during ground combat while serving in a medical unit that was organic to an infantry unit.

2.  Notwithstanding the applicant’s sincerity regarding his entitlement to this badge, in the absence of the above evidence, there is insufficient evidence upon which to base award of the Combat Medical Badge in this case.

3.  With respect to the Air Medal, there are no general orders available that show he was awarded the Air Medal.  The governing regulation requires a formal recommendation, approval through the chain of command, and announcement in orders for award of the Air Medal.  In the absence of orders or other independent evidence that would confirm he completed the number of missions necessary to be awarded the Air Medal, there is insufficient evidence upon which to base award of the Air Medal in this case.  

4.  Nevertheless, while the available evidence is insufficient for awarding the applicant an Air Medal, this in no way affects his right to pursue his claim for the Air Medal by submitting a request through his Member of Congress under the provisions of 10 USC 1130.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____x_  ___x_____  ___x_____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _______ _   _x______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100015493



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100015493



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100015478

    Original file (20100015478.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant's DD Forms 214 for the period ending 31 August 1967, 26 May 1970, and 21 June 1974 do not show the Combat Infantryman Badge or the Air Medal as authorized awards. Regrettably, there is insufficient evidence in which to base award of the Combat Infantryman Badge in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140014509

    Original file (20140014509.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). In the absence of evidence of the orders or other documentary evidence, such as an operation order, after action review, a by-name valor award, and/or statements from his former chain of command, that show he was personally present and actively participated in combat while assigned to an infantry unit, there is insufficient evidence upon which to base award of the Combat Infantryman Badge or add it...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090014557

    Original file (20090014557.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Item 41 (Awards and Decorations) of the applicant's DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) does not show he was awarded or authorized the Bronze Star Medal with "V" Device, the Air Medal, the Combat Infantryman Badge, the Air Assault Badge, the Presidential Unit Citation (Army), the Meritorious Unit Commendation (Army), the Valorous Unit Award, or the Republic of Vietnam Presidential Unit Citation. Item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100013187

    Original file (20100013187.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 22 January 1968, completed training, and was awarded the military occupational specialty 13E (Field Artillery Operations and Intelligence Assistant). The record does not contain any evidence that the applicant was recommended for award of the Air Medal or the Combat Infantryman Badge.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090013345

    Original file (20090013345.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). It allows, in effect, that upon the request of a Member of Congress, the Secretary concerned shall review a proposal for the award or presentation of a decoration (or the upgrading of a decoration), either for an individual or a unit, that is not otherwise authorized to be presented or awarded due to limitations established by law or policy for timely submission of a recommendation for such award or...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090009512

    Original file (20090009512.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence of record shows the applicant was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal. With respect to the Silver Star or the Bronze Star Medal with "V" Device, the decision of whether to award an individual a decoration and which decoration to award is a judgment call made by the commander having award approval authority. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding the applicant the Purple Heart for wounds...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080007660

    Original file (20080007660.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his military records to show that he was awarded the Air Medal and the Bronze Star Medal (BSM). The applicant’s contention that he should be awarded the Bronze Star Medal based on his award of the Combat Infantryman Badge is without merit. The applicant’s contention that he should be awarded the Air Medal based on his being transported, as a passenger, via helicopter to each of his missions is not supported by any evidence of record.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090000288

    Original file (20090000288.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    There is no evidence the applicant received the first award of the Army Good Conduct Medal. Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-3 also shows the applicant's unit (2nd Battalion, 501st Infantry) at the time of his assignment was awarded the Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal First Class Unit Citation based on Department of the Army General Orders Number 48, dated 1971. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100017421

    Original file (20100017421.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Air Medal (AM). In the absence of orders, there is insufficient evidence to correct his records to show the AM.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120000335

    Original file (20120000335.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, through his Member of Congress, correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show the Bronze Star Medal, Air Medal, and Army Good Conduct Medal. His DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows in: * item 38 (Record of Assignments) he received "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings throughout his military service * Item 41 (Awards and Decorations) no listing of the Bronze Star Medal, Air Medal, or Army...